Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Routine follow-up care for head and neck cancer after curative treatment: A 3-year experience of measuring patients' self-reported needs, preferences, quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up.
Brennan, Kelly; Hall, Stephen; Yoo, John; Rohland, Susan; Theurer, Julie; Peng, Paul.
Afiliación
  • Brennan K; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hall S; Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Yoo J; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rohland S; Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Theurer J; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Peng P; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(3): e13581, 2022 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35343002
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate and describe attitudes, quality of life (Qol), needs and preferences of patients with head and neck cancer after 3 years of follow-up care.

METHODS:

This is an exploratory prospective study of recurrence-free patients. Survey results were compared between 1-, 2- and 3-year post-treatment and by disease characteristics.

RESULTS:

A total of 116 patients were included with 46% oropharyngeal cancer, 66% early stage disease and 41% having had surgery. After 3 years, most patients reported good to excellent health (88%), however expressed uncertainty regarding recurrence (66%), multiple needs (information on prognosis 91%, long-term sequalae 72%) and wanted to continue with follow-up (96%). Few changes were observed over time, with exceptions. Patients with more advanced disease, oral cancer or who had surgery experienced declining Qol (p < 0.050). Women experienced improvements in Qol domains (pain p = 0.028, speech p = 0.009) over time. Attitudes towards communication with oncologists demonstrated improved patient comfort (p = 0.044) over the 3 years; however, patients' beliefs about their prognosis did not (71% vs. 73% vs. 77% did not believe they were cured, p = 0.581).

CONCLUSION:

Although patients' needs, preferences and attitudes towards follow-up did not change drastically, important needs persist. This work supports identifying individual patient needs and the challenges in addressing prognostic expectations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá