Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability.
Haddaway, Neal R; Bannach-Brown, Alexandra; Grainger, Matthew J; Hamilton, W Kyle; Hennessy, Emily A; Keenan, Ciara; Pritchard, Chris C; Stojanova, Jana.
Afiliación
  • Haddaway NR; Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany. neal_haddaway@hotmail.com.
  • Bannach-Brown A; Africa Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. neal_haddaway@hotmail.com.
  • Grainger MJ; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, QUEST Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
  • Hamilton WK; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Postboks 5685 Torgarden, 7485, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Hennessy EA; Psychological Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, USA.
  • Keenan C; Health Sciences Research Institute, University of California Merced, California, USA.
  • Pritchard CC; Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac Street, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Stojanova J; School of Psychology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Syst Rev ; 11(1): 113, 2022 06 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35659294
ABSTRACT
Rigorous evidence is vital in all disciplines to ensure efficient, appropriate, and fit-for-purpose decision-making with minimised risk of unintended harm. To date, however, disciplines have been slow to share evidence synthesis frameworks, best practices, and tools amongst one another. Recent progress in collaborative digital and programmatic frameworks, such as the free and Open Source software R, have significantly expanded the opportunities for development of free-to-use, incrementally improvable, community driven tools to support evidence synthesis (e.g. EviAtlas, robvis, PRISMA2020 flow diagrams and metadat). Despite this, evidence synthesis (and meta-analysis) practitioners and methodologists who make use of R remain relatively disconnected from one another. Here, we report on a new virtual conference for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in the R programming environment (ESMARConf) that aims to connect these communities. By designing an entirely free and online conference from scratch, we have been able to focus efforts on maximising accessibility and equity-making these core missions for our new community of practice. As a community of practice, ESMARConf builds on the success and groundwork of the broader R community and systematic review coordinating bodies (e.g. Cochrane), but fills an important niche. ESMARConf aims to maximise accessibility and equity of participants across regions, contexts, and social backgrounds, forging a level playing field in a digital, connected, and online future of evidence synthesis. We believe that everyone should have the same access to participation and involvement, and we believe ESMARConf provides a vital opportunity to push for equitability across disciplines, regions, and personal situations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Programas Informáticos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Policy_brief / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Syst Rev Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Programas Informáticos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Policy_brief / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Syst Rev Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania