Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices.
Mercier, Manuel R; Dubarry, Anne-Sophie; Tadel, François; Avanzini, Pietro; Axmacher, Nikolai; Cellier, Dillan; Vecchio, Maria Del; Hamilton, Liberty S; Hermes, Dora; Kahana, Michael J; Knight, Robert T; Llorens, Anais; Megevand, Pierre; Melloni, Lucia; Miller, Kai J; Piai, Vitória; Puce, Aina; Ramsey, Nick F; Schwiedrzik, Caspar M; Smith, Sydney E; Stolk, Arjen; Swann, Nicole C; Vansteensel, Mariska J; Voytek, Bradley; Wang, Liang; Lachaux, Jean-Philippe; Oostenveld, Robert.
Afiliación
  • Mercier MR; INSERM, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. Electronic address: manuel.mercier@inserm.fr.
  • Dubarry AS; CNRS, LPL, Aix-Marseille University, Aix-en-Provence, France.
  • Tadel F; Signal & Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA United States of America.
  • Avanzini P; Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy.
  • Axmacher N; Department of Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum 44801, Germany; State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, 19 X
  • Cellier D; Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America.
  • Vecchio MD; Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy.
  • Hamilton LS; Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America; Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communica
  • Hermes D; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
  • Kahana MJ; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
  • Knight RT; Department of Psychology and the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States of America.
  • Llorens A; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.
  • Megevand P; Department of Clinical neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Melloni L; Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany; Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 145 East 32nd Street, Room 828, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
  • Miller KJ; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Piai V; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Radboudumc, Donders Centre for Medical Neuroscience, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Puce A; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Programs in Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
  • Ramsey NF; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Schwiedrzik CM; Neural Circuits and Cognition Lab, European Neuroscience Institute Göttingen - A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max Planck Society, Göttingen, Germany; Perception and Plasticity Group, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germ
  • Smith SE; Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America.
  • Stolk A; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States of America.
  • Swann NC; University of Oregon in the Department of Human Physiology, United States of America.
  • Vansteensel MJ; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Voytek B; Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America; Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United States of America; Halicioglu Data Science Institute, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, United
  • Wang L; CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Lachaux JP; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, EDUWELL Team, INSERM UMRS 1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon F-69000, France.
  • Oostenveld R; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; NatMEG, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neuroimage ; 260: 119438, 2022 10 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35792291
Since the second-half of the twentieth century, intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), including both electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG), has provided an intimate view into the human brain. At the interface between fundamental research and the clinic, iEEG provides both high temporal resolution and high spatial specificity but comes with constraints, such as the individual's tailored sparsity of electrode sampling. Over the years, researchers in neuroscience developed their practices to make the most of the iEEG approach. Here we offer a critical review of iEEG research practices in a didactic framework for newcomers, as well addressing issues encountered by proficient researchers. The scope is threefold: (i) review common practices in iEEG research, (ii) suggest potential guidelines for working with iEEG data and answer frequently asked questions based on the most widespread practices, and (iii) based on current neurophysiological knowledge and methodologies, pave the way to good practice standards in iEEG research. The organization of this paper follows the steps of iEEG data processing. The first section contextualizes iEEG data collection. The second section focuses on localization of intracranial electrodes. The third section highlights the main pre-processing steps. The fourth section presents iEEG signal analysis methods. The fifth section discusses statistical approaches. The sixth section draws some unique perspectives on iEEG research. Finally, to ensure a consistent nomenclature throughout the manuscript and to align with other guidelines, e.g., Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) and the OHBM Committee on Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing (COBIDAS), we provide a glossary to disambiguate terms related to iEEG research.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Electroencefalografía / Electrocorticografía Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Electroencefalografía / Electrocorticografía Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article