Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unexpected breast cancer mimicking benign lesions on ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision biopsy: A retrospective cross-sectional study over a 20-year period.
Zhou, Wu; Luo, Honghao; Zhao, Haina; Peng, Yulan.
Afiliación
  • Zhou W; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Luo H; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Zhao H; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Peng Y; Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1108689, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36816915
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

This study investigated the occurrence rate of unexpected breast cancer (UEBC) mimicking benign lesions [Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 or 4a] using ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision biopsy (US-VAEB), and explored the factors responsible for late diagnosis of T2 stage UEBC. Materials and

methods:

We collected clinicopathologic data and preoperative US imaging features within 3 months before US-VAEB of patients who were diagnosed with UEBC from January 2002 to September 2022. The UEBC were divided into T1 and T2 stageUEBC. The US imaging features as well as clinical and pathological information of T1 and T2 stage UEBC were compared to explore the factors responsible for late diagnosis of T2 stage UEBC.

Results:

Breast cancer was diagnosed in 91 of 19 306 patients who underwent US-VAEB. We excluded eight patients with breast cancer assigned to BI-RADS 4b category by preoperative US, and two for whom US imaging records were unavailable. Finally, we enrolled 81 patients. The occurrence rate of UEBC after US-VAEB was 0.42%(81/19296). Of the 81 cases of UEBC, 22 were at T2 stage. The ratio of T2 stage UEBC was 27.2%. The differences in risk factor of breast cancer and routine breast US screening between T1 and T2 stage UEBC were significant[96.6% (57/59) vs 81.8% (18/22), 44.1% (26/59) vs 13.6% (3/22), respectively, P<0.05).

Conclusion:

UEBC was rarely detected by US-VAEB. Most cases of T2 stage UEBC were diagnosed late because of the absence of routine US screening and risk factors for breast cancer. Stricter clinical management regulations for breast lesions and performing regular US screening may be helpful to reduce T2 stage UEBC.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China