Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
End-of-Life Care Practice in Dying Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment For Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life : A Single Center Experience.
Jin, Sol; Kim, Jehun; Lee, Jin Young; Ko, Taek Yong; Oh, Gyu Man.
Afiliación
  • Jin S; Departments of Internal medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • Kim J; Departments of Pulmonology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • Lee JY; Departments of Infectious disease, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • Ko TY; Departments of Internal medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • Oh GM; Departments of Internal medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Hanguk Hosupisu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe Chi ; 23(2): 93-102, 2020 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37497083
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life came into force in February 2018 in Korea. This study reviews the practices of end-of-life care for patients who withdrew or withheld lifesustaining treatment at a tertiary care hospital, addresses the limitations of the law, and discusses necessary steps to promote patient-centered self-determination.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who died after agreeing to withhold lifesustaining treatment in 2018 at our university hospital. The cause of death, the intensity of end-of-life care, and other characteristics were reviewed and statistically analyzed.

Results:

Of a total of 334 patients, 231 (69%) died from cancer. The decision to stop life-sustaining treatment was made by family members for 178 patients overall (53.3%) and for 101 (43.7%) cancer patients, regardless of the patient's wishes. When the patient decided to stop lifesustaining treatment, the time from the authorization to withhold life-sustaining treatment to death was longer than when the decision was made by family members (28.7±41.3 vs 10.5±23.2 days, P<0.001).

Conclusion:

In many cases, the decision to discontinue lifesustaining treatment was made by the family, not by the patient. In order to protect human dignity based on the patients' self-determination, it is necessary for patients to understand their disease based on careful explanations from physicians. Ongoing survey-based research will be necessary in the future.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Hanguk Hosupisu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe Chi Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Hanguk Hosupisu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe Chi Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article