Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?
Minguez Ojeda, C; Laso García, I; López Curtis, D; Duque Ruiz, G; Mata Alcaraz, M; Santiago González, M; Artiles Medina, A; Hevia Palacios, M; Arias Fúnez, F; Burgos Revilla, F J.
Afiliación
  • Minguez Ojeda C; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain. Electronic address: cesar.minguez.1994@gmail.com.
  • Laso García I; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • López Curtis D; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • Duque Ruiz G; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • Mata Alcaraz M; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • Santiago González M; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • Artiles Medina A; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • Hevia Palacios M; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • Arias Fúnez F; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
  • Burgos Revilla FJ; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid. Spain.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 48(2): 134-139, 2024 Mar.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37657709
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones

METHODS:

Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.

RESULTS:

1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR=1.13; p=0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR=1.15; p=0.052) and number of waves (p=0.002; OR=1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR=1.131; p=0.000), number of waves (OR=1.000; p=0.000), energy (OR=1.005; p=0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p=0.024, OR=1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P=0.004, OR=0.571).

CONCLUSION:

Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uréter / Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales / Litiasis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uréter / Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales / Litiasis Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article