Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of scar age, laser type and laser treatment intervals on adult burn scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma, Yangmyung; Barnes, Sabrina P; Chen, Yung-Yi; Moiemen, Naiem S; Lord, Janet M; Sardeli, Amanda V.
Afiliación
  • Ma Y; Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Barnes SP; Hull York Medical School, York, United Kingdom.
  • Chen YY; Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Moiemen NS; Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Lord JM; Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Sardeli AV; Scar Free Foundation Centre for Burns Research, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 18(9): e0292097, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37756273
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The study aims to identify whether factors such as time to initiation of laser therapy following scar formation, type of laser used, laser treatment interval and presence of complications influence burn scar outcomes in adults, by meta-analysis of previous studies.

METHODS:

A literature search was conducted in May 2022 in seven databases to select studies on the effects of laser therapy in adult hypertrophic burn scars. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022347836).

RESULTS:

Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 491 patients. Laser therapy significantly improved overall VSS/POSAS, vascularity, pliability, pigmentation and scar height of burn scars. Vascularity improvement was greater when laser therapy was performed >12 months (-1.50 [95%CI = -2.58;-0.42], p = 0.01) compared to <12 months after injury (-0.39 [95%CI = -0.68; -0.10], p = 0.01), the same was true for scar height ((-1.36 [95%CI = -2.07; -0.66], p<0.001) vs (-0.56 [95%CI = -0.70; -0.42], p<0.001)). Pulse dye laser (-4.35 [95%CI = -6.83; -1.86], p<0.001) gave a greater reduction in VSS/POSAS scores compared to non-ablative (-1.52 [95%CI = -2.24; -0.83], p<0.001) and ablative lasers (-0.95 [95%CI = -1.31; -0.59], p<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Efficacy of laser therapy is influenced by the time lapse after injury, the type of laser used and the interval between laser treatments. Significant heterogeneity was observed among studies, suggesting the need to explore other factors that may affect scar outcomes.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido