Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Checketts' Grading System for Pin-site Infections across All Skin Colours.
Groenewoud, Rosalind; Chhina, Harpreet; Bone, Jeffrey; Sabharwal, Sanjeev; Iobst, Chris; Bafor, Anirejuoritse; Cooper, Anthony.
Afiliación
  • Groenewoud R; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
  • Chhina H; Department of Orthopaedics, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia.
  • Bone J; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia.
  • Sabharwal S; UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, California.
  • Iobst C; Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Bafor A; Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Cooper A; Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38033920
The Checketts' grading system (CGS) is the only classification that provides both a description of how to visually grade the infection and the appropriate course of treatment. There are no studies on the reliability of this system nor on whether skin colour can influence applicability. This study aims to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the CGS to assess whether this scale could be used as a universal grading system across all skin colours. A survey consisting of 134 anonymised photographs of pin-site infections was sent out to orthopaedic surgeons specialising in limb lengthening and reconstruction and to patients or carers of individuals who had external fixators. For each photograph, the participants were asked to grade the infection using the CGS, rate their confidence in their chosen grade on a Likert scale and assign a treatment option. The participants were supplied with the CGS at the beginning of the survey, after the 45th and 90th photographs. The inter-rater reliability of the CGS between the surgeons, expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), was poor-to-moderate at both time points (ICC = 0.56 for baseline survey and ICC = 0.48 for follow-up). This was similar for the patient or caretaker group. There was a lower inter-rater reliability for grading of dark skin as opposed to light skin by surgeons but not for patients or caretakers. The inter-rater reliability of treatment decisions between the surgeons was poor at both time points (kappa = 0.30 and 0.22) with similar inter-rater reliability for dark (kappa = 0.26 and 0.23) compared with light skin (kappa = 0.29 and 2.6). This was similar for the patient or caretaker group. The surgeons' confidence (Table 4) in grading was low (median = 1). The patient or caretaker group's confidence in their grading was modest (median = 2). The reliability of the CGS as assessed here demonstrates poor-to-moderate inter-rater reliability which makes interpretation of published pin site infection rates using this scale difficult. The design of new grading systems will need to consider skin colour to reduce inequities in medical decision-making. How to cite this article: Groenewoud R, Chhina H, Bone J, et al. Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Checketts' Grading System for Pin Site Infections across All Skin Colours. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(1):2-6.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article