Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perspectives of ICU Patients on Deferred Consent in the Context of Post-ICU Quality of Life: A Substudy of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
van der Wal, L Imeen; Grim, Chloe C A; Del Prado, Michael R; van Westerloo, David J; Schultz, Marcus J; Helmerhorst, Hendrik J F; de Vries, Martine C; de Jonge, Evert.
Afiliación
  • van der Wal LI; Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Grim CCA; Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Del Prado MR; Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Westerloo DJ; Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Schultz MJ; Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Helmerhorst HJF; Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • de Vries MC; Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • de Jonge E; Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Crit Care Med ; 52(5): 694-703, 2024 05 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180043
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Deferred consent enables research to be conducted in the ICU when patients are unable to provide consent themselves, and there is insufficient time to obtain consent from surrogates before commencing (trial) treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate how former ICU patients reflect on their participation in a study with deferred consent and examine whether their opinions are influenced by the quality of life (QoL) following hospital discharge.

DESIGN:

Survey study by questionnaire.

SETTING:

Eight ICUs in The Netherlands. PATIENTS Former ICU patients who participated in the ICONIC trial, a multicenter randomized clinical trial that evaluated oxygenation targets in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

INTERVENTIONS:

Participants enrolled in the ICONIC trial in one of the eight participating centers in The Netherlands received a questionnaire 6 months after randomization. The questionnaire included 12 close-ended questions on their opinion about the deferred consent procedure. QoL was measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. By calculating the EQ-5D index, patients were divided into four QoL quartiles, where Q1 reflects the lowest and Q4 is the highest. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Of 362 participants who were contacted, 197 responded (54%). More than half of the respondents (59%) were unaware of their participation in the ICONIC study. In total 61% were content with the deferred consent procedure, 1% were not content, 25% neutral, 9% did not know, and 9% answered "other." Those with a higher QoL were more likely to be content ( p = 0.02). In all QoL groups, the legal representative was the most often preferred individual to provide consent.

CONCLUSIONS:

Former ICU patients who participated in the ICONIC study often did not remember their participation but were predominantly positive regarding the use of deferred consent. Those with a higher QoL were most likely to be content.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos