Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modes of failure of guide catheter extensions: Insights from the MAUDE database.
Shaukat, Sana; Lodhi, Hamza; Khan, Harris; Desai, Anand; Luna, Michael; Brilakis, Emmanouil S; Khalili, Houman.
Afiliación
  • Shaukat S; Boca Regional Hospital, FAU Internal Medicine Residency, Boca Raton, FL, USA. Email: sana_shaukat09@hotmail.com.
  • Lodhi H; Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  • Khan H; Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  • Desai A; Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  • Luna M; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Brilakis ES; Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Khalili H; Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA; Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, Florida, USA.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 36(1)2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224297
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Guide catheter extensions (GCEs) are commonly used to facilitate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). We investigated the incidence and modes of failure of GCEs..

METHODS:

Data from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database between 2012 and 2022 were used to investigate the most common modes of failure and related adverse events with the use of GCEs. We performed analysis of 4 commonly used catheters GuideLiner (Teleflex), Guidezilla (Boston Scientific), TrapLiner (Teleflex), and Telescope (Medtronic). The first event reported for GuideLiner was in 2012, Guidezilla in 2018, TrapLiner in 2017, and Telescope in 2019.

RESULTS:

During the study period, a total of 651 events were reported to the database. A total of 429 true GCE device failures were identified 59 (14%) for GuideLiner, 297 (69%) for Guidezilla, 47 (11%) TrapLiner, and 26 (6%) for Telescope. Catheter detachment or fracture was the most frequently reported device failure for all 4 GCEs; these failures included shaft fractures, tip deformations, and collar detachments. We identified 222 reported events as unspecified adverse events; these events included device-to-device incompatibility, difficulty to advance, and device fractures outside the patient body. Only 58 (8.9%) events resulted in patient complication. Of these, coronary artery dissection was the most frequently reported complication.

CONCLUSIONS:

Device detachment/fracture is the most common mode of device failure in all 4 GCEs, and coronary dissection is the most common patient complication.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Catéteres / Disección Aórtica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Invasive Cardiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Catéteres / Disección Aórtica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Invasive Cardiol Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article