Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Letrozole cotreatment progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
Wang, Xiaoning; Zhang, Ying; Diao, Honglu; Jiang, Shengfang; Zhang, Changjun.
Afiliación
  • Wang X; Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhang Y; Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
  • Diao H; Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
  • Jiang S; Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
  • Zhang C; Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 50(5): 890-898, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403851
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To investigate the impact of letrozole cotreatment progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) (Le PPOS) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and the pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 2575 cycles were included (1675 in the Le PPOS group and 900 in the PPOS group). The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rates. The secondary outcome was the live birth rates.

RESULTS:

In this study, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to create a perfect match of 379 patients in each group. After matching, the numbers of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, fertilization, and clinical pregnancy rates were more favorable in the Le PPOS group than in the PPOS group (all p < 0.05). The multivariable analysis showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the Le PPOS than in the PPOS group (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.04, p = 0.024) after adjusting for potentially confounding factors (age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicular count, the type of embryo transferred, number of transferred embryos, body mass index, and follicular stimulating hormone and estradiol levels on starting day).

CONCLUSIONS:

This retrospective study with a limited sample size suggests that the Le PPOS protocol might be an alternative to the PPOS protocol in women undergoing COS and could lead to better pregnancy outcomes. The results should be confirmed using a formal randomized controlled trial.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Inducción de la Ovulación / Progestinas / Fertilización In Vitro / Índice de Embarazo / Letrozol Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Inducción de la Ovulación / Progestinas / Fertilización In Vitro / Índice de Embarazo / Letrozol Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article