Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between the social vulnerability index and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in Rhode Island.
Hwang, Jihwan; Risica, Patricia Markham; Lamy, Eric; Goedel, William.
Afiliación
  • Hwang J; School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Box G-S121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. jihwan_hwang@alumni.brown.edu.
  • Risica PM; School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Box G-S121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
  • Lamy E; Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Goedel W; School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Box G-S121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(8): 1143-1149, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613745
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cancer screening is effective in reducing the burden of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers, but not all communities have appropriate access to these services. In this study, we aimed to identify under-resourced communities by assessing the association between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) with screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers in ZIP-code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) in Rhode Island.

METHODS:

This study leveraged deidentified health insurance claims data from HealthFacts RI, the state's all-payer claims database, to calculate screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers using Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures. We used spatial autoregressive Tobit models to assess the association between the SVI, its four domains, and its 15 component variables with screening rates in 2019, accounting for spatial dependencies.

RESULTS:

In 2019, 73.2, 65.0, and 66.1% of eligible individuals were screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. For every 1-unit increase in the SVI, screening rates for breast and colorectal cancer were lower by 0.07% (95% CI 0.01-0.08%) and 0.08% (95% CI 0.02-0.15%), respectively. With higher scores on the SVI's socioeconomic domain, screening rates for all three types of cancers were lower.

CONCLUSION:

The SVI, especially its socioeconomic domain, is a useful tool for identifying areas that are under-served by current efforts to expand access to screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. These areas should be prioritized for new place-based partnerships that address barriers to screening at the individual and community level.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino / Poblaciones Vulnerables / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Causes Control / Cancer causes and control / Cancer causes control Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino / Poblaciones Vulnerables / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Causes Control / Cancer causes and control / Cancer causes control Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos