Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review to create a framework for the steps in developing condition-specific preference-based instruments de novo or from an existing non-preference-based instrument: use of item response theory or Rasch analysis.
Tsui, Teresa C O; Torres, Sofia C; Bielecki, Joanna M; Mitsakakis, Nicholas; Trudeau, Maureen E; Bremner, Karen E; Davis, Aileen M; Krahn, Murray D.
Afiliación
  • Tsui TCO; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. teresa.tsui@utoronto.ca.
  • Torres SC; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON, Canada. teresa.tsui@utoronto.ca.
  • Bielecki JM; Child Health and Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. teresa.tsui@utoronto.ca.
  • Mitsakakis N; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Trudeau ME; Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Bremner KE; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Davis AM; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Krahn MD; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 22(1): 38, 2024 May 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745165
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is no widely accepted framework to guide the development of condition-specific preference-based instruments (CSPBIs) that includes both de novo and from existing non-preference-based instruments. The purpose of this study was to address this gap by reviewing the published literature on CSPBIs, with particular attention to the application of item response theory (IRT) and Rasch analysis in their development.

METHODS:

A scoping review of the literature covering the concepts of all phases of CSPBI development and evaluation was performed from MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to December 30, 2022.

RESULTS:

The titles and abstracts of 1,967 unique references were reviewed. After retrieving and reviewing 154 full-text articles, data were extracted from 109 articles, representing 41 CSPBIs covering 21 diseases or conditions. The development of CSPBIs was conceptualized as a 15-step framework, covering four phases 1) develop initial questionnaire items (when no suitable non-preference-based instrument exists), 2) establish the dimensional structure, 3) reduce items per dimension, 4) value and model health state utilities. Thirty-nine instruments used a type of Rasch model and two instruments used IRT models in phase 3.

CONCLUSION:

We present an expanded framework that outlines the development of CSPBIs, both from existing non-preference-based instruments and de novo when no suitable non-preference-based instrument exists, using IRT and Rasch analysis. For items that fit the Rasch model, developers selected one item per dimension and explored item response level reduction. This framework will guide researchers who are developing or assessing CSPBIs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Qual Life Outcomes Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Qual Life Outcomes Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá