Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metal implant allergy: A retrospective cohort analysis at a university allergy practice.
Taliercio, Mark J; Alnabulsi, Rawaa K; Uppal, Priya A; Shaw, Ian M; Semenza, Kristy M; Pasha, Muhammad A.
Afiliación
  • Taliercio MJ; From the Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
  • Alnabulsi RK; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
  • Uppal PA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
  • Shaw IM; Department of Pediatrics, Albany Medical Collage, Albany, New York, and.
  • Semenza KM; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, New York.
  • Pasha MA; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(3): 186-194, 2024 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755777
ABSTRACT

Background:

Concern of metal sensitization in pre- and postsurgical evaluation is growing, with the recent guidelines remaining the criterion standard for consideration of patch testing. Information remains scarce on surgical screening in the groups of patients who reported a history of metal sensitivity versus those with no reported history.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to assess the utility of patch testing in surgical candidates based on reported metal allergy history. The secondary objective was to evaluate the utility and outcomes in postsurgical patch testing.

Methods:

Nine hundred and thirty-one patient charts of patients with the diagnosis of "contact dermatitis" who underwent an evaluation at a single allergy clinic site between January 2013 and December 2022 were identified and reviewed as part of a retrospective chart review study. Patients were included in subgroups based on the time of patch testing and history of reported metal allergy.

Results:

In all, 67 patients underwent patch testing, 10 (14.9%) of whom were surgical candidates without a history of metal sensitivity, 31 (46.2%) of whom were surgical candidates with a history of metal sensitivity, and 26 (38.8%) of whom were postsurgical patients. Twenty-nine (43.3%) of patients had positive patch testing results, with only one (10%) in the presurgical group, 17 (54.8%) in the presurgical with a history of metal sensitivity, and 11 (42.3%) in the postsurgical group. Zero patients in our cohort without metal sensitivity who were undergoing the Nuss procedure had positive reactions on patch testing, whereas two of four (50%) with reported metal sensitivity who were undergoing the Nuss procedure had positive relevant metal reactions.

Conclusion:

Ambiguity in the utility of patch testing for surgical decision making remains, despite common utilization. Recent guidelines along with coordination of care among the surgeon, allergist, and patient remains the criterion standard of care.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Pruebas del Parche / Metales Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Allergy Asthma Proc Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Pruebas del Parche / Metales Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Allergy Asthma Proc Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article