Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Cancer Care: A Nationwide Landscape Assessment Update.
Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth J; Jatoi, Aminah; Dressler, Emily V; Kittel, Carol; Weaver, Kathryn E; Nightingale, Chandylen; Neuman, Heather; Loh, Kah Poh; Kamen, Charles.
Afiliación
  • Cathcart-Rake EJ; Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Jatoi A; Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Dressler EV; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Kittel C; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Weaver KE; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Nightingale C; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Neuman H; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  • Loh KP; Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
  • Kamen C; Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 20(9): 1272-1279, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768413
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Routine collection of sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI; collectively SOGI) in cancer clinics advances cancer care equity.

METHODS:

In 2022, NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice groups were asked about routine collection of SOGI data in the electronic health record. The proportions of practice groups reporting collection of SO and/or GI data were calculated, and practice group characteristics were assessed for associations.

RESULTS:

Of 271 practice groups nationwide, 42% (n = 112) collect SO data, 58% (n = 157) collect GI data, and 35% (n = 96) collect both. In multivariate analyses, SO data collection was associated with practice groups having minority outreach staff (odds ratio [OR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.81]; P = .02); GI data collection was associated with practice groups located in the Northeastern United States (OR, 2.08 [95% CI, 0.73 to 5.91]; P = .045), and those with a higher proportion of new patients who were White (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04]; P < .001). Practice groups in the South were least likely to collect SOGI data (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.94]; P = .004). There were no statistically significant differences in SO and/or GI collection on the basis of the practice group's proportion of Medicaid/Medicare patients, number of new patients with cancer per year, or practice ownership.

CONCLUSION:

Slightly over one third of NCORP practice groups report routinely collecting SOGI data. There are regional differences in data collection, underscoring the need to craft targeted, region-specific interventions focused on boosting the capture and recording of SOGI data in an affirming manner.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Sexual / Identidad de Género / Neoplasias Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Sexual / Identidad de Género / Neoplasias Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article