Perceived discrimination and refraining from seeking physician's care in Sweden: an intersectional analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (AIHDA).

BACKGROUND: Discrimination may further impede access to medical care for individuals in socially disadvantaged positions. Sociodemographic information and perceived discrimination intersect and define multiple contexts or strata that condition the risk of refraining from seeking physician's care. By applying analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (AIHDA) we aimed to improve the mapping of risk by considering both strata average risk differences and the accuracy of such strata risks for distinguishing between individuals who did or did not refrain from seeking physician's care. METHODS: We analysed nine annual National Public Health Surveys (2004, 2007-2014) in Sweden including 73,815 participants. We investigated the risk of refraining from seeking physician's care across 64 intersectional strata defined by sex, education, age, country of birth, and perceived discrimination. We calculated strata-specific prevalences and prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate the discriminatory accuracy (DA). RESULTS: Discriminated foreign-born women aged 35-49 with a low educational level show a six times higher risk (PR = 6.07, 95% CI 5.05-7.30) than non-discriminated native men with a high educational level aged 35-49. However, the DA of the intersectional strata was small (AUC = 0.64). Overall, discrimination increased the absolute risk of refraining from seeking physician's care, over and above age, sex, and educational level. CONCLUSIONS: AIHDA disclosed complex intersectional inequalities in the average risk of refraining from seeking physician's care. This risk was rather high in some strata, which is relevant from an individual perspective. However, from a population perspective, the low DA of the intersectional strata suggests that potential interventions to reduce such inequalities should be universal but tailored to the specific contextual characteristics of the strata. Discrimination impairs access to healthcare.

Geographical and sociodemographic differences in statin dispensation after acute myocardial infarction in Sweden: a register-based prospective cohort study applying analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (AIHDA) for basic comparisons of healthcare quality.

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, as in many other countries, official monitoring of healthcare quality is mostly focused on geographical disparities in relation to a desirable benchmark. However, current evaluations could be improved by considering: (1) The intersection of other relevant axes of inequity like age, sex, income and migration status; and (2) The existence of individual heterogeneity around averages. Therefore, using an established quality indicator (ie, dispensation of statins after acute myocardial infarction, AMI), we valuate both geographical and sociodemographic inequalities and illustrate how the analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (AIHDA) enhances such evaluations. POPULATION AND METHODS: We applied AIHDA and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of regional and sociodemographic differences in the statin dispensations of 35 044 patients from 21 Swedish regions and 24 sociodemographic strata who were discharged from the hospital with an AMI diagnosis between January 2011 and December 2013. Following the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, we used a benchmark value of 90%. RESULTS: Dispensation of stains after AMI in Sweden did not reach the desired target of 90%. Regional differences were absent/very small (AUC=0.537) while sociodemographic differences were small (AUC=0.618). Women, especially those with immigrant background and older than 65 years, have the lowest proportions of statin dispensations after AMI. CONCLUSIONS: As the AUC statistics are small, interventions trying to achieve the benchmark value should be universal. However, special emphasis should nevertheless be directed towards women, especially older women with immigrant backgrounds.

Assessing the use of clinical guidelines against domestic violence in southern Sweden: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Domestic violence is a prevalent public health issue. While clinical guidelines and care programs for its identification and handling have been formulated in all administrative regions of Sweden, their degree of implementation is largely unknown. This study aims to assess the implementation of one administrative region's care program, including how it is seen to align with and function in clinical practice, and any perceived barriers to or facilitators of its use. METHODS: A survey was distributed to first-line managers for healthcare units with patient contact in the region (n = 807). The responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Open responses were analysed thematically. Group interviews (n = 5) were held with caregivers (n = 15) working primarily with young patients and analysed thematically. RESULTS: 73% of the survey respondents reported previous awareness of the care program, and 27% reported knowledge of its content. The extent to which their staff knew about and followed the care program was assessed to be relatively low. The survey response rate was 19%. Among interview participants, knowledge of the care program was generally quite low. Survey responses and interview discussions pointed to the importance of developing routines, of collegial and managerial support and of training on domestic violence and the care program. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the knowledge and use of the regional care program is limited among healthcare staff, including among those working with young patients. This underscores the importance of information and training for furthering the implementation of clinical guidelines on domestic violence.