Expression profile of LncRNA ANRIL, miR-186, miR-181a, and MTMR-3 in patients with preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several studies demonstrated the role of lncRNAs and miRNAs in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia; the aim was to detect the expression profiles of serum LncRNA ANRIL, miR-186, miR-181a, and MTMR-3 in patients with preeclampsia. The study included 160 subjects divided into 80 subjects considered as a control group, 80 patients with preeclampsia. We found that there was a significant difference between the preeclampsia and control groups with up-regulation of miR-186 median (IQR) = 4, 29 (1.35-7.73) (P < 0.0001), miR-181a median (IQR) = 2.45 (0.83-6.52) (P = 0.028), and downregulation of lncRNA ANRIL median (IQR) = 0.35(0.28-0.528) (P < 0.0001), MTMR median (IQR) = 0.32(0.155-1.11), (P < 0.0001). ROC curve of lncRNA ANRIL, miR-186, miR-181a, and MTMR-3 in preeclampsia patients showing the roles of these markers in the diagnosis of preeclampsia. In conclusion, serum LncRNA ANRIL, miR-186, miR-181a, and MTMR-3 could be promising biomarkers in the diagnosis of preeclampsia.

Prevalence and risk factor of postoperative adhesions following repeated cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of intraperitoneal adhesions after repeated cesarean delivery and its associated personal and surgical risk factors. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the delivery ward at Fayoum University Hospital from October 2020 to December 2021. Women were recruited according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible women were interviewed, and data were obtained for personal history, past surgical and obstetrical history, and data about the current delivery. Nair's scoring system was used to evaluate intraperitoneal adhesions. Postoperative data and complications were reported. RESULTS: Three hundred women were recruited. Moderate to severe adhesions occurred in 186 patients (62%). These patients had a significantly prolonged hospital stay and were delivered by expert surgeons (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). The adhesion score correlated positively with patients' age (P < 0.001), parity (P < 0.001), interpregnancy interval (P = 0.033), duration of hospital admission either previously or in the current delivery (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001), time to ambulation (P < 0.001), time to intestinal movement (P < 0.001), operative time (P < 0.001), and surgeons' age and experience (both P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Adhesions led to increased maternal morbidity. Multiple contributing factors were significantly related to adhesions with multiple cesarean deliveries.

Different azithromycin protocols for management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is associated with polymicrobial infection; hence broad-spectrum antibiotics are recommended. Nowadays, Azithromycin is used instead of Erythromycin due to erythromycin shortages, its ease of administration, decreased cost, and better side effect profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different azithromycin protocols for the conservative management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. METHODS: It was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial including pregnant women at 24-36+6 weeks with viable singleton pregnancies and confirmed preterm prelabor rupture of membranes from January 01, 2020, to June 01, 2021. The participants were randomized into two groups: Group I was made of women who received Azithromycin 1000 mg PO once, and Group II of women who received Azithromycin 500 mg PO once, followed by Azithromycin 250 mg PO daily for four days. The primary study outcome was the length of the latency period from the diagnosis of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes to delivery (days). RESULTS: The latency period in group I was significantly higher than that in Group II (5.80 ± 5.44 days vs. 2.88 ± 2.37; respectively, p = 0.0001). The mean gestational age at the time of delivery was significantly higher in Group I (p = 0.0001). However, postpartum endometritis and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) rates were significantly higher in Group II (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The higher dose of Azithromycin was associated with better maternal and neonatal outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial identification number: Clinical trial.gov: NCT04202380 (17/ 12/ 2019). Date of registration: 1/1 /2020. Date of initial participant enrollment30 /1/2020. URL of the registration site: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04202380.

Preoperative duloxetine on postoperative pain after laparoscopic gynecological surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative duloxetine on postoperative pain management after gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries. METHODS: A systematic search was done in Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus from inception to September 2021. We selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared preoperative duloxetine (intervention group) versus placebo (control group) among women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgeries. Our primary outcomes were pain scores evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Our secondary outcomes were the time required for the first analgesic request in minutes, postoperative analgesic consumption in milligrams, length of hospital stay in days, and side effects. RESULTS: Four RCTs with a total number of 244 patients were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. We found duloxetine was linked to a significant reduction in VAS pain scores at different time intervals. The first analgesic request was significantly earlier in the placebo group than in the duloxetine group (p = 0.03). In addition, duloxetine significantly reduced the postoperative analgesic consumption compared to placebo (MD= -41.97, 95% CI [-53.23, -30.72], p<0.001). However, both groups did not differ in the length of hospital stay and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine administration prior to gynecological laparoscopic surgeries is safe and effective in improving postoperative pain and analgesia.

The effect of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on pain perception during and after hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

This paper reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of hyoscine-N-butylbromide (HBB) administration in hysterosalpingography (HSG). Four electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared HBB versus placebo or no intervention in infertile women undergoing HSG. Pain during and after HSG and different adverse events including nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were evaluated. Three RCTs with 335 patients were included. The analysis showed HBB was significantly effective in reducing pain during and after HSG (MD = -0.76 mm, 95% CI [-1.35, -0.17], p = 0.01) and (MD = -0.81 mm, 95% CI [-1.07, -0.56], p < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in adverse events between HBB and control groups. The methodological evidence quality was high as evaluated by GRADEpro. In conclusion, this review provides good evidence that prior administration of HBB is effective in reducing induced pain during and after HSG with tolerable side effects.

Effect of piroxicam administration in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate piroxicam effect on different pregnancy outcomes among infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART). METHODS: We searched for the available randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in four different databases during January 2021 that compared piroxicam (intervention group) to placebo/no treatment (control group) in infertile women performing ART. We extracted the available data from included studies and pooled them in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. We pooled the dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using RevMan software. Our outcomes were rates of clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, and any adverse events. RESULTS: Seven RCTs met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 1226 patients. Piroxicam was linked to a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate compared to control group (RR = 1.30, 95% CI [1.09, 1.55], p = .003). However, we did not report any significant difference between both groups in ongoing pregnancy rate (RR = 1.27, 95% CI [0.72, 2.24], p = .41). In addition, the rates of miscarriage and adverse events were not different among both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Piroxicam administration increases the clinical pregnancy rate among infertile women. However, piroxicam does not affect miscarriage and ongoing pregnancy rates.

High dose vs. low dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy between high dose and low dose oxytocin administration for labor augmentation. METHODS: We searched for the available studies during March 2020 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ISI Web of science. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed safety and efficacy of high dose vs. low dose oxytocin for labor augmentation were considered. The extracted data were entered into RevMan software. Dichotomous and continuous data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) respectively, with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our main outcomes were cesarean delivery rate, spontaneous vaginal delivery rate, uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole, and labor duration from oxytocin infusion. RESULTS: Eight RCTs with 3,154 patients were included. High dose oxytocin did not reduce cesarean delivery rate compared to low dose oxytocin (OR=0.76, 95% CI [0.52, 1.10], p=0.15). After solving the reported heterogeneity, high dose oxytocin did not increase the rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries vs. low dose oxytocin (OR=1.06, 95% CI [0.84, 1.32], p=0.64). Low dose oxytocin was linked to a significant decline in uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole (p>0.001). A reduction in labor duration was found in high dose oxytocin group over low oxytocin regimen (MD=-1.02 h, 95% CI [-1.77, -0.27], p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantages for high dose oxytocin over low dose oxytocin in labor augmentation except in reducing labor duration. Low dose oxytocin is safer as it decreases the incidence of uterine hyperstimulation and tachysystole. More trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Outpatient versus inpatient balloon catheter insertion for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare between outpatient and inpatient balloon catheter insertion for labor induction. METHODS: We searched in four different databases for the available trials during May 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outpatient to inpatient balloon catheter for induction of labor. We extracted the available data from the included studies and pooled them in meta-analysis using RevMan software. The dichotomous data were pooled as risk ratio (RR) and the continuous data were pooled as mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).Our primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Our secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, Bishop score, and different adverse events including postpartum hemorrhage, Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes, and chorioamnionitis. RESULTS: Eight RCTs with a total number of 740patients were included. The cesarean delivery rate was significantly reduced among outpatient balloon catheter compared to inpatient balloon catheter (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.46, 0.86], p = 0.004). Outpatient balloon catheter was associated with shorter hospital stay duration in comparison with inpatient group (MD= -0.38, 95% CI [-0.61, -0.14], p = 0.002). Outpatient group was linked to a more favorable increase in Bishop score (MD = 0.88, 95% CI [0.78, 0.98], p>0.001). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding different adverse events. CONCLUSION: Outpatient balloon catheter priming is safe and effective in reducing cesarean delivery rates and shortening the length of hospital stay with a better Bishop score.