Giant SEPs and SEP-recovery function in Unverricht-Lundborg disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between sensory hyperexcitability as revealed by giant SEPs and the SEP recovery function (SEP-R) in a series of patient with progressive myoclonic epilepsy of Unverricht-Lundborg type, identified as epilepsy, progressive myoclonic 1A (EPM1A), MIM #254800. METHODS: We evaluated SEPs by applying median nerve stimuli and SEP-R using paired stimuli at inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) of between 20 and 600 ms in 25 patients and 20 controls. The SEPs were considered "giant" if the N20P25 and P25N33 amplitudes exceeded normal mean values by +3SD. RESULTS: During the paired-stimulus protocol, the SEPs elicited by the second stimulus (S2) were detectable at all ISIs but consistently suppressed in the 13 patients with giant SEPs reflecting a significantly delayed SEP-R. Maximal suppression roughly corresponded to the plateau of a broad middle latency (>100 ms) wave pertaining to the S1 response. CONCLUSIONS: The cortical processing dysfunction generating giant SEPs in EPM1A patients consistently combines with a long-lasting suppression of hyperexcitability that leads to a delayed giant SEP-R without obstructing the response to incoming stimuli. SIGNIFICANCE: The delayed SEP-R is not due to true inhibition but the suppression of aberrant hyper-synchronisation sustaining giant SEPs. A broad middle latency SEP component adds a significantly suppressive effect. This suggests that cortico-subcortical circuitries contribute to both the gigantism and the delayed SEP-R.

Movement-related desynchronization-synchronization (ERD/ERS) in patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease.

We studied changes in event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) patterns in patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD), presenting with prominent action myoclonus. We analyzed the movement-related ERD/ERS in alpha and beta frequency bands in 15 patients using self-paced finger extension as a motor paradigm and we compared the results with those obtained in 12 healthy volunteers. In all ULD patients, alpha- and beta-ERD regularly occurred with onset and location similar to that found in healthy controls, but the desynchronization of alpha activity was significantly greater than in controls (C3: -64.4+/-9.8% vs. -49.7+/-14.8%; p=0.004). Moreover, in the patients, both alpha- and beta-ERD spread toward frontal electrodes. In controls, the post-movement beta-ERS regularly occurred; it was absent in eight patients with severe action myoclonus, while, in seven patients with mild or moderate myoclonus, the beta-peak was significantly smaller with respect to that measured in controls (55.6+/-15.1% vs. 153.9+/-99.8%, p=0.006). The failure of beta-ERS well-correlated with motor impairment resulting from action myoclonus, whereas SSEPs and long-loop reflexes performed to detect signs of cortical hyperexcitability showed inconsistent changes. In ULD patients, ERD/ERS changes indicate an increased activation of motor cortex during movement planning and a great reduction of post-excitatory inhibition of motor cortex. The changes involving beta-ERS had a significant relationship with the functional disability in individual patients and might play a pathogenic role in the motor dysfunction.

FVEPs in Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease: waveforms and interaction with the periodic EEG pattern assessed by single sweep analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise flash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs) in 20 patients with Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease (CJD), and assess the relationships between spontaneous EEG patterns and the responses to individual stimuli. METHODS: We analysed the shape and time course of periodic sharp wave complexes (PSWCs) and responses to 1 Hz flashes. In nine patients, we applied an algorithm based on an autoregressive model with exogenous input (ARX) to estimate responses to individual random flashes and their interaction with PSWCs. RESULTS: The FVEPs included P1 and N1 components in all patients, and the P2 peak in 18. Eight patients showed giant FVEPs (N1-P2>60 V), all of whom had an MM polymorphism in codon 129 of the prion protein gene; in seven cases, the presence of giant FVEPs correlated with a prominent and almost continuous periodic EEG pattern. Giant N1-P2 abnormally spread on the anterior scalp regions, and had a different waveform distribution from that of the PSWCs. In five patients with a normal or slightly enlarged average N1-P2 amplitude, single sweep (ARX) analysis revealed a period of relative refractoriness following individual PSWCs. In four patients with 'giant' FVEPs, the individual responses occurred regardless of the interval between the stimulus and previous PSWC, but their amplitude had an inverse relationship with the interval length. CONCLUSIONS: Giant responses to flash stimuli are a common finding in CJD patients (40% of our cases). Single sweep ARX analysis showed that PSWCs were followed by a period of partial refractoriness, which prevented most of the individual responses to flashes, but not giant FVEPs. The association between prominent spontaneous paroxysms and giant FVEPs suggests that both are due to a common hyperexcitable change favouring neuronal synchronisation. SIGNIFICANCE: Our data contribute to clarifying the debated problem of the occurrence of giant FVEPs in CJD and their relationships with the spontaneous periodic EEG pattern.

Sensorimotor cortex excitability in Unverricht-Lundborg disease and Lafora body disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD) and Lafora body disease (LBD) can be differentiated on the basis of their neurophysiologic profiles. METHODS: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), long-loop reflexes (LLRs), and the influence of conditioning nerve stimulation on the motor potentials evoked by transcranial stimulation in 8 patients with LBD and 10 patients with ULD were investigated. RESULTS: Both groups showed sensorimotor cortex hyperexcitability, but their electrophysiologic profiles were different. Enlarged P25 to N33 SSEP components and enhanced LLRs were common in the ULD patients, whereas medium-latency "giant" SSEP components and less consistently enhanced LLRs were more frequently found in the patients with LBD. Cortical relay time was extremely brief in ULD but varied in LBD. Conditioning somatosensory stimuli differently affected motor cortex excitability, leading to early facilitation in ULD and delayed and prolonged facilitation in LBD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease (ULD) and Lafora body disease (LBD) have different electrophysiologic profiles. The ULD findings point to an aberrant subcortical or cortical loop (possibly short-cutting the somatosensory cortex) that is involved in generating the prominent action myoclonus characterizing the disorder. The LBD findings highlight sustained hyperexcitability of the sensorimotor cortex in response to afferent stimuli, which fit with a more severe impairment of inhibitory mechanisms.