Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis-like eruptions in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment by targeting immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4, but concerns about severe immune-related adverse events persist. The scarcity of literature on dermatologic implications, especially severe reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), highlights the urgent need for investigation. OBJECTIVE: Our systematic review aims to address the gap in relevant literature by extensively examining the epidemiologic risk factors and management of SJS/TEN-like illnesses in ICI-treated patients to provide insights for risk assessment and clinical care. METHODS: We identified 158 case reports that detailed the incidence of SJS/TEN in patients being treated with ICIs, examining demographic patterns, type of malignancy, clinical characteristics, and treatments linked to onset. We assessed mortality rates, risk elements, and the effectiveness of interventions to help guide clinical care. RESULTS: Analysis of 158 case reports revealed that SJS/TEN in ICI users is typically seen on average at the age of 63 and is more common in males. PD1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are often associated with various mucocutaneous patterns and significant risks with ICI use, especially TEN, which is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates. LIMITATIONS: Our study notes limitations due to the inclusion of case reports or case series, such as potential publication and reporting biases, leading to skewed findings. Additionally, because of the heterogeneous reporting standards, the retrospective nature limits phenotypic precision, control for confounding variables, and data completeness. CONCLUSION: Our study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology, clinical features, management strategies, and outcomes of ICI-induced SJS/TEN, underscoring the importance of vigilant monitoring and personalized risk assessment in oncology practice. Continued research efforts are essential to optimize patient outcomes and enhance the safety profile of ICIs in cancer therapy.

Treatment of lichen sclerosus with hydroxychloroquine: a Mayo Clinic experience.

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of studies investigating the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of either anogenital lichen sclerosus or extragenital lichen sclerosus, a condition that, if left untreated, could lead to a greater degree of scarring and malignant transformation. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the demographic characteristics, clinicopathological features, treatment response, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with either anogenital or extragenital lichen sclerosus who received hydroxychloroquine therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with lichen sclerosus who underwent treatment with hydroxychloroquine at our institution between 2018 and 2023. RESULTS: Among the cohort, 67 patients were female, and 3 were male. Extragenital lichen sclerosus was diagnosed in 23 patients, with 16 exhibiting concomitant morphea overlap. Itching was the predominant clinical presentation (67%). A notable proportion of patients (36%) had a connective tissue disorder, prompting hydroxychloroquine therapy. Among the 30 patients treated solely for lichen sclerosus, 21 demonstrated response and 9 had no response. From a broader comparison of response to hydroxychloroquine, the overall anogenital response rate was 84.6% as opposed to 50% in extragenital lichen sclerosus. The median time to initial response was 4 months. Adverse effects, predominantly mild, were observed in 10 (14.3%) patients. LIMITATION: This study is constrained by its retrospective nature and reliance on data from a single center, resulting in a limited sample size. CONCLUSION: Hydroxychloroquine demonstrates promise as a therapeutic option for anogenital lichen sclerosus because of its favorable response rates and low incidence of adverse effects. However, further investigations, including larger-scale or prospective studies, are imperative to ascertain its definitive efficacy.

Patterns and distribution of regional nodal involvement and recurrence in a surgically treated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma cohort at a tertiary center.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and describe the patterns of regional metastases and recurrences after surgical treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with OPSCC from 2006 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. Only patients treated with surgery including a neck dissection were included. Patients with unknown human papillomavirus (HPV) status, prior head and neck cancer, distant metastases, or synchronous head and neck cancer were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 928 patients were included. 89% were males, the average age was 58.6 years (range: 25.2-87.5), 874 (94%) were HPV(+), and 513 (55.3%) had a tonsil cancer. Among cN + patients, the most commonly involved levels at presentation were level II (85.2%), level III (33.3%), and level IV (9.4%). In cN0 patients, metastases were only observed in level II (16.2%) and level III (9.2%). Nodal recurrence occurred in 48 (5.2%) patients after a median time of 1.0 years (interquartile range: 0.6-2.0). Nodal recurrence incidence was similar in HPV(+) and HPV(-) patients (5.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.44). The most common levels for regional recurrence were ipsilateral level II (45.8%), contralateral level II (43.8%), and ipsilateral level V (25.0%). Multivariable analysis revealed that pN was a significant predictor for regional recurrence (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the distribution of regional metastases and recurrences in HPV(+) and HPV(-) OPSCC patients. Our findings align with the established understanding that regional metastases predominantly manifest in the ipsilateral level II-IV at presentation. Moreover, the data support the clinical recommendation to restrict elective neck dissection in cN0 patients to ipsilateral levels IIa and III, excluding level IIb. Regional recurrence is significantly associated with pN status.