Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 22(6): 440-3, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25715019

RESUMEN

We aimed to determine the accuracies of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) and stethoscopes as part of the physical examinations of patients with dyspnea. Three emergency medicine specialists in each of two groups of ultrasound and stethoscope performers underwent didactic and hands-on training on PoCUS and stethoscope usage. All the patients enrolled were randomized to one of two predetermined PoCUS or stethoscope groups. The diagnostic performance of ultrasonography was higher than that of the stethoscope in the diagnoses of heart failure (90 vs. 86%, 1.00 vs. 0.89, and 5.00 vs. 4.92, respectively) and pneumonia (90 vs. 86.7%, 0.75 vs. 0.73, and 16.50 vs. 13.82, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the utility parameters of these modalities in these diagnoses. Although some authors argue that it is time to abandon the 'archaic tools' of past centuries, we believe that it is too early to discontinue the use of the stethoscope.


Asunto(s)
Disnea/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografía Doppler/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Estetoscopios/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica , Intervalos de Confianza , Enfermedad Crítica , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Disnea/etiología , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Examen Físico/métodos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA