Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Cureus ; 13(9): e17834, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34660042

RESUMEN

Background Individuals living in the same household are exposed to common risk factors. We hypothesized that living with someone who has fatty liver disease increases the risk of having the same disease. Methods This was a retrospective study that included pairs of men and women who shared the same residential addresses, underwent screening non-contrast computed tomography for coronary calcium scoring and had Hounsfield Unit density for liver and spleen in the field of view available for measurement. The primary goal was to determine the association between hepatic steatosis and living in the same household. Secondary end-points compared to body mass index, triglyceride levels, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension. Results Out of 1,362 cohabitant pairs, there were 202 couples with either the male or female having hepatic steatosis and 10 cohabitant pairs with both the male and female having hepatic steatosis. In 1,150 cohabitant pairs out of 1,362, neither man nor woman had hepatic steatosis. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for hepatic steatosis between cohabitant pairs was 0.122 (p-value: < 0.001), suggesting that no correlation was found. Elevated triglyceride levels were prevalent among cohabitant pairs with hepatic steatosis, when compared to pairs without hepatic steatosis (p-value < 0.05). Female gender and having a diagnosis of hepatic steatosis also showed a strong association with higher body mass index, T2DM and hypertension (p-value < 0.05). Conclusion Despite the assumption of exposure to similar environmental factors, our results did not show any correlation of hepatic steatosis among the cohabitants.

3.
Cureus ; 12(4): e7711, 2020 Apr 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32431989

RESUMEN

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an infection in the ascitic fluid. Despite published guidelines, an inappropriate diagnosis of SBP is frequent. In this study, we aim to evaluate guideline adherence in diagnosing SBP. This is a retrospective study conducted between January 2015 and January 2018. Based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the European Association for the Study of Liver (EASL), two authors judged guideline adherence in SBP diagnosis and management. One hundred and six patients were included in the study, and 93% were hospitalized. The mean age was 56.9 years, and 62 patients were males. In addition, Caucasians were the most common ethnicity (86.8%). The authors judged that only 52.4% of patients were appropriately diagnosed, and only 67.3% were managed with proper treatment. Inpatient mortality was documented in five patients, and the readmission rate within 30-days after discharge was 29.3%. In conclusion, SBP is a common complication of cirrhosis, which can be managed with adherence to published guidelines. In our population, guidelines were not implemented in diagnosing nearly half the SBP patients, mostly due to misdiagnosis of SBP with secondary peritonitis or non-neutrocytic bacteriascites, starting antibiotics before performing the paracentesis, and even giving broad-coverage antibiotics when not indicated. Further efforts are needed to enhance adherence to guidelines in clinical practice.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA