Pulmonary Functional Outcomes at 3 Months in Critical COVID-19 Survivors Hospitalized during the First, Second, and Third Pandemic Waves.

INTRODUCTION: Despite improved management of patients with COVID-19, we still ignore whether pharmacologic treatments and improved respiratory support have modified outcomes for intensive care unit (ICU) surviving patients of the three first consecutive waves (w) of the pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether developments in the management of ICU COVID-19 patients have positively impacted respiratory functional outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and chest CT scan patterns in ICU COVID-19 surviving patients at 3 months, according to pandemic waves. METHODS: We prospectively included all patients admitted to the ICU of two university hospitals with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19. Data related to hospitalization (disease severity, complications), demographics, and medical history were collected. Patients were assessed 3 months post-ICU discharge using a 6 min walking distance test (6MWT), a pulmonary function test (PFT), a respiratory muscle strength (RMS) test, a chest CT scan, and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: We included 84 ARDS COVID-19 surviving patients. Disease severity, complications, demographics, and comorbidities were similar between groups, but there were more women in wave 3 (w3). Length of stay at the hospital was shorter during w3 vs. during wave 1 (w1) (23.4 ± 14.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 20.8 days, p = 0.0304). Fewer patients required mechanical ventilation (MV) during the second wave (w2) vs. during w1 (33.3% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.0038). Assessment at 3 months after ICU discharge revealed that PFTs and 6MWTs scores were worse for w3 > w2 > w1. QoL (SF-36) deteriorated (vitality and mental health) more for patients in w1 vs. in w3 (64.7 ± 16.3 vs. 49.2 ± 23.2, p = 0.0169). Mechanical ventilation was associated with reduced forced expiratory volume (FEV1), total lung capacity (TLC), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and respiratory muscle strength (RMS) (w1,2,3, p < 0.0500) on linear/logistic regression analysis. The use of glucocorticoids, as well as tocilizumab, was associated with improvements in the number of affected segments in chest CT, FEV1, TLC, and DLCO (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With better understanding and management of COVID-19, there was an improvement in PFT, 6MWT, and RMS in ICU survivors 3 months after ICU discharge, regardless of the pandemic wave during which they were hospitalized. However, immunomodulation and improved best practices for the management of COVID-19 do not appear to be sufficient to prevent significant morbidity in critically ill patients.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin upon Emergency Department Admission during SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Procalcitonin is a marker for bacterial diseases and has been used to guide antibiotic prescription. Procalcitonin accuracy, measured at admission, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), is unknown in the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin to assess the need for antibiotic treatment in patients with CAP presenting to the emergency department during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a real-world diagnostic retrospective accuracy study of procalcitonin in patients admitted to the emergency department. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on procalcitonin results compared to the reference standard of combined microbiological and radiological analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under (AUC) the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated in two analyses: first assessing procalcitonin ability to differentiate microbiologically proven bacteria from viral CAP and then clinically diagnosed bacterial CAP from viral CAP. RESULTS: When using a procalcitonin threshold of 0.5 ng/mL to identify bacterial etiology within patients with CAP, we observed sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 64.1%, and 43% and 82.6%, respectively, in the two analyses. The positive and negative predictive values of a procalcitonin threshold of 0.5 ng/mL to identify patients for whom antibiotics should be advised were 46.4% and 79.7%, and 48.9% and 79% in the two analyses, respectively. The AUC for the two analyses was 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.68) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin measured upon admission during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should not guide antibiotic treatment in patients with CAP.

Post-discharge critical COVID-19 lung function related to severity of radiologic lung involvement at admission.

Lung function impairment persists in 55% of critical COVID-19 patients three months after ICU discharge. Patient lung function, exercise capacity, radiologic, and quality of life data suggest impairment is related to radiologic lung involvement at admission.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: CT Quantification of Airway Dimensions, Numbers of Airways to Measure, and Effect of Bronchodilation.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of bronchodilation on airway indexes reflecting airway disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to determine the minimum number of segmental and subsegmental airways required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethical committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Twenty patients with COPD who had undergone pre- and postbronchodilator pulmonary function tests and computed tomographic (CT) examinations were prospectively included. Eight healthy volunteers underwent two CT examinations. Luminal area and wall thickness (WT) of third- and fourth-generation airways were measured twice by three readers. The percentage of total airway area occupied by the wall and the square root of wall area at an internal perimeter of 10 mm (√WAPi10) were calculated. The effects of pathologic status, session, reader, bronchodilation, and CT examination were assessed by using mixed linear model analyses. The number of airways to measure for a definite percentage error of √WAPi10 was computed by using a bootstrap method. RESULTS: There were no significant session, reader, or bronchodilation effects on WT in third-generation airways and √WAPi10 in patients with COPD (P values ranging from .187 to >.999). WT in third-generation airways and √WAPi10 were significantly different in patients with COPD and control subjects (P = .018 and <.001, respectively). Measuring 12 third- or fourth-generation airways ensured a maximal 10% error of √WAPi10. CONCLUSION: WT in third-generation airways and √WAPi10 are not significantly different before and after bronchodilation and are different in patients with COPD and control subjects. Twelve is the minimum number of third- or fourth-generation airways required to ensure a maximal 10% error of √WAPi10. (©) RSNA, 2015 Clinical trial registration no. NCT01142531 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Enucleation of a leiomyoma of the mid-esophagus through a right thoracoscopy with the patient in prone position.

BACKGROUND: Leiomyoma is the most common benign esophageal neoplasm. Different open and minimally invasive approaches have been described. We describe a right thoracoscopic enucleation with the patient in the prone position. METHOD: A 49-year-old woman consulted us about solid-diet dysphagia without other symptoms. Preoperative work-up showed the presence of 50 x 28-mm leiomyoma of the middle esophagus, without satellite lymph nodes. The patient underwent general anesthesia with a double-lumen endotracheal tube, and subsequently was placed in the prone position. A 30 degrees scope was introduced in the right 7th intercostal space on the posterior axillary line. Perioperative gastroscopy permitted localization of the lesion, which appeared to be situated at the level of the azygos vein. Two 5-mm trocars were inserted in the right 5th and 9th intercostal spaces on one line with the first one. The azygos vein was ligated. The muscular layer of the mid-esophagus was opened by coagulating hook. Due to a 2-mm trocarless Cadière's forceps (Microfrance, France), introduced into the right 7th intercostal space, the operative field was well exposed and the lesion was enucleated without mucosal perforation. The muscular layer was closed by interrupted silk 2/0 stitches. A drain was left in the chest cavity. RESULTS: Total operative time was 85 min and blood loss was less than 20 ml. The gastrograffin swallow on postoperative day 2 showed good clearance of the esophagus and absence of leak, hence the patient was allowed a liquid diet. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. Benign pathology was confirmed. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopy in the prone position permits the surgeon to reach the esophagus under excellent working conditions, despite an only partially deflated lung. Gravity displaces blood loss eventually, which allows good visualization, and the surgeon can operate in an ergonomic position. This approach allows for fewer trocars which favorably influences the patient's comfort and reduces the length of hospital stay.

Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project.

HYPOTHESIS: The 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography is an imaging tool for assessing clinical tumor, node, metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) has been studied as a potential prognostic factor for survival. However, the sample sizes are limited leading to conduct a meta-analysis to improve the precision in estimating its effect. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search. For each publication, we extracted an estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) for comparing patients with a low and a high SUV and we aggregated the individual HRs into a combined HR, using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We found 13 eligible studies dedicated to NSCLC. Most of them included patients with stages I to III/IV and used a SUV assessment corrected for body weight. Number of patients ranged from 38 to 315 (total: 1474); 11 studies identified a high SUV as a poor prognostic factor for survival although two studies found no significant correlation between SUV and survival. SUV measurement and SUV threshold for defining high SUV were study dependent, eight studies looked for a so-called best cutoff (maximizing the logrank test statistic) without adjusting the p value for multiplicity. Overall, the combined HR for the 13 reports was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.70-3.02); excluding the studies proposing a "best" cutoff, it was 2.08 (95% CI: 1.431-3.04). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that the primary tumor SUV measurement has a prognostic value in NSCLC; these results should be confirmed in a meta-analysis on individual patients' data.