RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The introduction of rituximab significantly improved the prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), emphasizing the importance of evaluating the long-term consequences of exposure to radiotherapy, alkylating agents and anthracycline-containing (immuno)chemotherapy among DLBCL survivors. METHODS: Long-term risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) was examined in a multicenter cohort comprising 2373 5-year DLBCL survivors treated at ages 15-61 years in 1989-2012. Observed SMN numbers were compared with expected cancer incidence to estimate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs/10 000 person-years). Treatment-specific risks were assessed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 321 survivors developed one or more SMNs (SIR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8, AER 51.8). SIRs remained increased for at least 20 years after first-line treatment (SIR ≥20-year follow-up 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, AER 81.8) and were highest among patients ≤40 years at first DLBCL treatment (SIR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0-3.5). Lung (SIR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.7, AER 13.4) and gastrointestinal cancers (SIR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, AER 11.8) accounted for the largest excess risks. Treatment with >4500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide/>300 mg/m2 doxorubicin versus ≤2250 mg/m2/≤150 mg/m2, respectively, was associated with increased solid SMN risk (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2). Survivors who received rituximab had a lower risk of subdiaphragmatic solid SMNs (hazard ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.0) compared with survivors who did not receive rituximab. CONCLUSION: Five-year DLBCL survivors have an increased risk of SMNs. Risks were higher for survivors ≤40 years at first treatment and survivors treated with >4500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide/>300 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and may be lower for survivors treated in the rituximab era, emphasizing the need for studies with longer follow-up for rituximab-treated patients.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Humanos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Sobrevivientes , Ciclofosfamida , Doxorrubicina , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer may benefit from non-surgical management. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of visual response assessment of the primary tumour after nCRT on T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer who underwent T2W- and DW-MRI (1·5 T) before and after nCRT in two hospitals, between July 2013 and September 2017, were included in this prospective study. Three radiologists evaluated T2W images retrospectively using a five-point score for the assessment of residual tumour in a blinded manner and immediately rescored after adding DW-MRI. Histopathology of the resection specimen was used as the reference standard; ypT0 represented a pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and interobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS: Twelve of 51 patients (24 per cent) had a pCR. The sensitivity and specificity of T2W-MRI for detection of residual tumour ranged from 90 to 100 and 8 to 25 per cent respectively. Respective values for T2W + DW-MRI were 90-97 and 42-50 per cent. AUCs for the three readers were 0·65, 0·66 and 0·68 on T2W-MRI, and 0·71, 0·70 and 0·70 on T2W + DW-MRI (P = 0·441, P = 0·611 and P = 0·828 for readers 1, 2 and 3 respectively). The κ value for interobserver agreement improved from 0·24-0·55 on T2W-MRI to 0·55-0·71 with DW-MRI. CONCLUSION: Preoperative assessment of residual tumour on MRI after nCRT for oesophageal cancer is feasible with high sensitivity, reflecting a low chance of missing residual tumour. However, the specificity was low; this results in overstaging of complete responders as having residual tumour and, consequently, overtreatment.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Esofagectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate delineation of the primary tumour is vital to the success of radiotherapy and even more important for successful boost strategies, aiming for improved local control in oesophageal cancer patients. Therefore, the aim was to assess delineation variability of the gross tumour volume (GTV) between CT and combined PET-CT in oesophageal cancer patients in a multi-institutional study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty observers from 14 institutes delineated the primary tumour of 6 cases on CT and PET-CT fusion. The delineated volumes, generalized conformity index (CIgen) and standard deviation (SD) in position of the most cranial/caudal slice over the observers were evaluated. For the central delineated region, perpendicular distance between median surface GTV and each individual GTV was evaluated as in-slice SD. RESULTS: After addition of PET, mean GTVs were significantly smaller in 3 cases and larger in 1 case. No difference in CIgen was observed (average 0.67 on CT, 0.69 on PET-CT). On CT cranial-caudal delineation variation ranged between 0.2 and 1.5â¯cm SD versus 0.2 and 1.3â¯cm SD on PET-CT. After addition of PET, the cranial and caudal variation was significantly reduced in 1 and 2 cases, respectively. The in-slice SD was on average 0.16â¯cm in both phases. CONCLUSION: In some cases considerable GTV delineation variability was observed at the cranial-caudal border. PET significantly influenced the delineated volume in four out of six cases, however its impact on observer variation was limited.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Oncología Médica/normas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Cuidados Posteriores/normas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/normas , Biopsia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Oncología Médica/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/diagnóstico , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/normas , Pronóstico , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) rarely presents as early-stage disease, but clinical observations suggest that patients who present with early-stage disease may have better outcomes than those with advanced-stage disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 13-institution study, we examined outcomes among 179 patients with early-stage (stage I or II) MCL in an attempt to identify prognostic factors that influence treatment selection and outcome. Variables examined included clinical characteristics, treatment modality, response to therapy, sites of failure, and survival. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male (78%) with head and neck being the most common presenting sites (75%). Most failures occurred outside the original disease site (79%). Although the administration of radiation therapy, either alone or with chemotherapy, reduced the risk of local failure, it did not translate into an improved freedom from progression or overall survival (OS). The treatment outcomes were independent of treatment modality. The 10-year OS for patients treated with chemotherapy alone, chemo-radiation therapy and radiation therapy alone were 69%, 62%, and 74% (P = 0.79), and the 10-year freedom from progression were 46%, 43%, and 31% (P = 0.64), respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the excellent OS rates regardless of initial therapy in patients with early-stage MCL, de-intensified therapy to limit treatment-related toxicity is a reasonable approach.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células del Manto/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Quimioradioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células del Manto/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abdominal radiotherapy for testicular cancer (TC) increases risk for second stomach cancer, although data on the radiation dose-response relationship are sparse. METHODS: In a cohort of 22,269 5-year TC survivors diagnosed during 1959-1987, doses to stomach subsites were estimated for 92 patients who developed stomach cancer and 180 matched controls. Chemotherapy details were recorded. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of second primary stomach cancer was 1.45% at 30 years after TC diagnosis. The TC survivors who received radiotherapy (87 (95%) cases, 151 (84%) controls) had a 5.9-fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-20.7) increased risk of stomach cancer. Risk increased with increasing stomach dose (P-trend<0.001), with an OR of 20.5 (3.7-114.3) for ⩾50.0 Gy compared with <10 Gy. Radiation-related risks remained elevated ⩾20 years after exposure (P<0.001). Risk after any chemotherapy was not elevated (OR=1.1; 95% CI 0.5-2.5; 14 cases and 23 controls). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for TC involving parts of the stomach increased gastric cancer risk for several decades, with the highest risks after stomach doses of ⩾30 Gy. Clinicians should be aware of these excesses when previously irradiated TC survivors present with gastrointestinal symptoms and when any radiotherapy is considered in newly diagnosed TC patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiología , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Sobrevivientes , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: How does the successful cryopreservation of semen affect the odds of post-treatment fatherhood among Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among 334 survivors who wanted to have children, the availability of cryopreserved semen doubled the odds of post-treatment fatherhood. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Cryopreservation of semen is the easiest, safest and most accessible way to safeguard fertility in male patients facing cancer treatment. Little is known about what proportion of patients achieve successful semen cryopreservation. To our knowledge, neither the factors which influence the occurrence of semen cryopreservation nor the rates of fatherhood after semen has been cryopreserved have been analysed before. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a cohort study with nested case-control analyses of consecutive Hodgkin survivors treated between 1974 and 2004 in multi-centre randomized controlled trials. A written questionnaire was developed and sent to 1849 male survivors. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Nine hundred and two survivors provided analysable answers. The median age at treatment was 31 years. The median follow-up after cryopreservation was 13 years (range 5-36). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three hundred and sixty-three out of 902 men (40%) cryopreserved semen before the start of potentially gonadotoxic treatment. The likelihood of semen cryopreservation was influenced by age, treatment period, disease stage, treatment modality and education level. Seventy eight of 363 men (21%) used their cryopreserved semen. Men treated between 1994 and 2004 had significantly lower odds of cryopreserved semen use compared with those treated earlier, whereas alkylating or second-line (chemo)therapy significantly increased the odds of use; no other influencing factors were identified. We found an adjusted odds ratio of 2.03 (95% confidence interval 1.11-3.73, P = 0.02) for post-treatment fatherhood if semen cryopreservation was performed. Forty-eight out of 258 men (19%) who had children after HL treatment became a father using cryopreserved semen. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Data came from questionnaires and so this study potentially suffers from response bias. We could not perform an analysis with correction for duration of follow-up or provide an actuarial use rate due to lack of dates of semen utilization. We do not have detailed information on either the techniques used in cryopreserved semen utilization or the number of cycles needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Lance Armstrong Foundation, Dutch Cancer Foundation, René Vogels Stichting, no competing interests.
Asunto(s)
Criopreservación , Fertilidad , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Preservación de Semen , Semen , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the long-term results of radiotherapy for patients with gastric marginal zone lymphoma (GMZL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective, multi-centre study of patients with low-grade GMZL treated by radiotherapy between 17 July 1981 and 25 March 2004. RESULTS: There were 102 eligible patients. Fifty-eight patients were previously untreated and 44 had recurrent/residual disease after prior treatment (HP eradication, chemotherapy and surgery in 35, 9 and 8 patients, respectively, and 7 had >1 prior therapy). Radiation fields included the stomach /involved nodes in 61 patients and whole abdomen in 41. The median radiotherapy dose to stomach was 40 Gy (range 26-46 Gy) in a median 22 fractions. With a median follow-up after radiotherapy of 7.9 years (range 0.3-24 years), 10- and 15-year freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was 88% (95% CI 82%-95%). Risk factors for TF were a large-cell component (P = 0.036) and an exophytic growth pattern (P = 0.042). Radiotherapy field size, radiotherapy dose, and failure of prior therapy were not associated with inferior FFTF. Ten-year overall survival was 70% (95% CI 60%-82%). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy achieves cure for the majority of patients with low-grade GMZL, including patients who have had prior therapy. Several features may predict a poorer outcome.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/radioterapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate current literature on gene expression profiling in oesophageal cancer. METHODS: We performed a review of the literature (2000-2010) on prognostication and prediction using gene expression analysis in oesophageal cancer. RESULTS: Seventeen papers comprising 638 patients were included. Gene expression profiles studied in relation to survival, lymph node metastasis and response to neoadjuvant therapy. Most studies included a limited number of patients. Several prognostic and predictive gene signatures were identified with different accuracies. In only one study, the gene signature was validated in a large, independent patient cohort. CONCLUSION: Gene expression profiling has potential clinical applications in oesophageal cancer. Especially a signature which is predictive for response to neoadjuvant treatment could be of great clinical value. To date, most published studies suffer from an underpowered training cohort or lack adequate validation. Clinicians should put effort in the collection of high quality tissue samples and should participate in biobank initiatives, considering the increasing availability and possibilities of sequencing technology.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Análisis por Micromatrices , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) patients are at increased risk of developing a contralateral testicular germ cell tumour (CTGCT). It is unclear whether TGCT treatment affects CTGCT risk. METHODS: The risk of developing a metachronous CTGCT (a CTGCT diagnosed ≥6 months after a primary TGCT) and its impact on patient's prognosis was assessed in a nationwide cohort comprising 3749 TGCT patients treated in the Netherlands during 1965-1995. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs), comparing CTGCT incidence with TGCT incidence in the general population, and cumulative CTGCT incidence were estimated and CTGCT risk factors assessed, accounting for competing risks. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18.5 years. Seventy-seven metachronous CTGCTs were diagnosed. The SIR for metachronous CTGCTs was 17.6 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 13.9-22.0). Standardised incidence ratios remained elevated for up to 20 years, while the 20-year cumulative incidence was 2.2% (95% CI 1.8-2.8%). Platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with a lower CTGCT risk among non-seminoma patients (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.72). The CTGCT patients had a 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.3-4.1) increased risk to develop a subsequent non-TGCT cancer and, consequently, a 1.8-fold (95% CI 1.1-2.9) higher risk of death than patients without a CTGCT. CONCLUSION: The TGCT patients remain at increased risk of a CTGCT for up to 20 years. Treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy reduces this risk.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/terapia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/patología , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for breast cancer may expose the esophagus to ionizing radiation, but no study has evaluated esophageal cancer risk after breast cancer associated with radiation dose or systemic therapy use. DESIGN: Nested case-control study of esophageal cancer among 289 748 ≥5-year survivors of female breast cancer from five population-based cancer registries (252 cases, 488 individually matched controls), with individualized radiation dosimetry and information abstracted from medical records. RESULTS: The largest contributors to esophageal radiation exposure were supraclavicular and internal mammary chain treatments. Esophageal cancer risk increased with increasing radiation dose to the esophageal tumor location (P(trend )< 0.001), with doses of ≥35 Gy associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-28]. Patients with hormonal therapy ≤5 years preceding esophageal cancer diagnosis had lower risk (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). Based on few cases, alkylating agent chemotherapy did not appear to affect risk. Our data were consistent with a multiplicative effect of radiation and other esophageal cancer risk factors (e.g. smoking). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer is a radiation dose-related complication of radiotherapy for breast cancer, but absolute risk is low. At higher esophageal doses, the risk warrants consideration in radiotherapy risk assessment and long-term follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Índice de Masa Corporal , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/radioterapia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/radioterapia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies on quality of care for oesophageal cancer patients usually include only traditional outcome parameters. The aim of the study was to address quality of care in a broader perspective. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, 821 oesophageal cancer patients were referred to our institute. Indicators to measure quality of care (i.e., process and outcome measures) were defined and comparisons between two time periods were made. RESULTS: 335 patients came for a second opinion only, 382 patients received palliative treatment and 104 (13%) patients underwent potentially curative treatment. The median time between the first hospital visit and start of treatment decreased from 24 days in period I to 18 days in period II (P = 0.03). Of patients who underwent potentially curative treatment, 81% in period I and 86% in period II were discussed during a weekly multidisciplinary meeting (P = 0.54). Compliance with the national guideline was comparable in both periods (84% vs. 80%, P = 0.27). There were non-significant improvements in completion of chemoradiation (85% vs. 91%), postoperative complication rates (57% vs. 33%) and 3-year survival (40% vs. 46%). CONCLUSION: By evaluating different dimensions of health care quality, we have identified which steps in the multidisciplinary care path need more attention in order to raise the whole level of care. Efforts for improvement should focus primarily on process measures rather than on outcome measures for which high-quality standards are already met.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Hospitales Especializados , Humanos , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Pronóstico , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This consensus report of the EGILS (European Gastro-Intestinal Lymphoma Study) group includes recommendations on the management of gastric extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT. They are based on data from the literature and on intensive discussions and votings of the experts during their annual meetings.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/complicaciones , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/microbiología , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Gástricas/microbiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgery alone for locally advanced oesophageal cancer is associated with low cure rates. The benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with oesophageal cancer were evaluated. METHODS: A systematic review of publications between 2000 and 2008 on neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer was undertaken. RESULTS: Thirty-eight papers comprising 3640 patients met the inclusion criteria. Chemoradiation regimens varied widely with a predominance of 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin chemotherapy. Chemoradiation-related toxicity was reported in only ten studies and consisted mainly of neutropenia. The chemoradiation-related mortality rate was 2.3 per cent. The mean R0 resection rate and pathological complete response (pCR) rate were 88.4 and 25.8 per cent respectively. Postoperative morbidity was not uniformly reported. The in-hospital mortality rate after oesophagectomy following chemoradiation was 5.2 per cent. Five-year survival rates varied from 16 to 59 per cent in all patients and from 34 to 62 per cent in those with a pCR. Chemoradiation had a temporary negative effect on quality of life. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimens for oesophageal cancer vary widely. Besides traditional outcome variables (such as survival), other parameters should be analysed (for example toxicity) to assess whether the risks of chemoradiation are sufficiently compensated for by the benefits.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Calidad de Vida , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of single-dose internal irradiation (brachytherapy) and self-expanding metal stent placement in the palliation of oesophageal obstruction due to cancer of the oesophagus. DESIGN: Randomised trial. METHOD: In the period from December 1999-Jun 2002, 209 patients with dysphagia due to inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus were randomised to placement of an Ultraflex stent (n = 108) or single-dose (12 Gy) brachytherapy (n = 101). Primary outcome was relief of dysphagia; secondary outcomes were complications, persistent or recurrent dysphagia, health-related quality of life, and costs. Patients were followed up by monthly home visits from a specialised nurse. RESULTS: Dysphagia improved more rapidly after stent placement than after brachytherapy, but long-term relief of dysphagia was better after brachytherapy. Stent placement resulted in more complications than did brachytherapy (36/108 (33%) versus 21/101 (21%); p = 0.02), due mainly to an increased incidence of late haemorrhage in the stent group (14 versus 5; p = 0.05). The groups did not differ with regard to the incidence of persistent or recurrent dysphagia or median survival (p > 0.20). In the long term, quality-of-life scores were higher in the brachytherapy group. Total medical costs were also similar for both treatments: Euro 8,215 for stent placement and Euro 8,135 for brachytherapy. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy provided better long-term relief of dysphagia than did stent placement and also produced fewer complications. Brachytherapy is therefore recommended as the preferred treatment for the palliation of dysphagia due to oesophageal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Estenosis Esofágica/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Stents , Anciano , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metales , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Stents/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study the response rates and duration of response after low-dose (4 Gy) involved field radiotherapy (LD-IF-RT) in patients with recurrent indolent lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 109 assessable patients (304 symptomatic sites) were irradiated (53 males and 56 females; median age, 62 years; range, 35 to 93), including 98 patients with follicular lymphoma (43 grade 1 and 55 grade 2), nine extranodal marginal zone lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-type and two patients with lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma. Bulky disease (> or =5 cm) was present in 52% of all patients. A median of two prior regimens (range, 0 to 11) preceded LD-IF-RT. The median time since diagnosis was 41 months (range, 2 to 358 months). Time to (local) progression was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in response rates between treatments within the same patient were compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 92%; complete response was reached in 67 patients (61%), partial response in 34 patients (31%), stable disease in six patients (6%), and progressive disease in two patients (2%). The median time to progression was 14 months. The median time to local progression was 25 months. The 67 patients with complete response showed a median time to progression of 25 months and a median time to local progression of 42 months. None of the factors studied (age, sex, follicular lymphoma grade, radiotherapy regimen, number of previous regimens and previous history, number of positive sites or largest lymphoma diameter) were found to be related to response rate. CONCLUSION: LD-IF-RT is a valuable asset in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma and should be considered in patients with recurrent disease.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B/radioterapia , Linfoma Folicular/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B/patología , Linfoma Folicular/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Sobrevida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
With the help of two experts in gastrointestinal oncology from The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoekhuis, a decision-support system is being developed for patient-specific therapy selection for oesophageal cancer. The kernel of the system is a probabilistic network that describes the presentation characteristics of cancer of the oesophagus and the pathophysiological processes of invasion and metastasis. While the construction of the graphical structure of the network was relatively straightforward, probability elicitation with existing methods proved to be a major obstacle. To overcome this obstacle, we designed a new method for eliciting probabilities from experts that combines the ideas of transcribing probabilities as fragments of text and of using a scale with both numerical and verbal anchors for marking assessments. In this paper, we report experiences with our method in eliciting the probabilities required for the oesophagus network. The method allowed us to elicit many probabilities in reasonable time. To gain some insight in the quality of the probabilities obtained, we conducted a preliminary evaluation study of our network, using data from real patients. We found that for 85% of the patients, the network predicted the correct cancer stage.