Geriatric conditions and invasive management in frail patients with NSTEMI. A subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Invasive management in frail patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains controversial. We investigated the impact of various geriatric conditions. METHODS: The MOSCA-FRAIL trial included 167 adults aged ≥ 70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS] ≥ 4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomized to either an invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy. In addition to frailty, we measured activities of daily living (Barthel index), cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test), and comorbidities (Charlson index). The primary endpoint was the difference (invasive minus conservative) in restricted mean survival time (RMST) for all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 3.9 years. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients died. The RMST difference favored invasive management at the CFS 25th percentile (CFS=4; 157 days, 95%CI, 18-295; P=.027), which changed to a nonsignificant effect at the 50th and 75th percentiles. The RMST difference remained nonsignificant, irrespective of the severity of other geriatric assessments. In time-to-event analysis, invasive management was associated with an initially lower life expectancy, peaking at around 1 year, among all subgroups. However, patients with CFS=4 experienced a benefit at the end of follow-up (181 days, 95%CI, 19-343), whereas those with CFS >4 did not (-16 days, 95%CI, -217 to 186; interaction P=.16). Subgroups defined by other geriatric markers showed a similar time-dependent trend, albeit with weaker statistical interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with frailty and NSTEMI, the CFS might be useful for evaluating the relative risks and benefits of invasive management. A CFS >4 could serve as a valuable threshold for decision-making.

"A stratified pathway to stent-free reperfusion: Selecting suitable patients in ST-elevation myocardial infarction".

BACKGROUND: The DANAMI-3 DEFER study demonstrated that deferring stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is safe, although not superior to immediate stenting. It is possible that an individualized revascularization strategy in STEMI, achieved through appropriate patient selection, could be feasible and effective. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized study included 198 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between October 2019 and November 2021. Patients were assigned to either the deferred stenting (DS) group (n = 19) or the control group (C) undergoing immediate stenting (n = 179) based on a multimodal approach integrating coronary angiography, intravascular imaging, physiological assessments, and clinical judgment. The primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: The DS group showed a significantly lower rate of stent implantation (10.5 % vs. 97.7 %, p < 0.001) and a higher use of thrombus aspiration (89.5 % vs. 30.7 %, p < 0.001) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (31.6 % vs. 6.7 %, p < 0.001) compared to the C group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of all-cause mortality (5.3 % vs. 8.9 %, p = 0.59) or MACCE (10.5 % vs. 8.4 %, p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing individualized reperfusion strategies in STEMI within a real-world clinical setting. The findings, while limited by the study design, generate valuable hypotheses that warrant further investigation to refine patient selection criteria and optimize outcomes.

Impact of gender on in-hospital and long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an analysis of the Spanish TAVI registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Impact of gender on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate gender-specific differences in TAVI and its impact on outcomes. METHODS: This analysis used data from the prospective Spanish TAVI registry, which included consecutive TAVI patients treated in 46 Spanish centers from 2009 to 2021. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital and 30-day mortality and TAVI-related complications. Adjusted logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The study included 12 253 consecutive TAVI patients with a mean age of 81.2±6.4 years. Women (53.9%) were older, and had a higher STS-PROM score (7.0±7.0 vs 6.2±6.7; P < .001) than men. Overall, the TAVI-related complication rate was similar between women and men, with specific gender-related complications. While women more frequently developed in-hospital vascular complications (13.6% vs 9.8%; P <.001) and cardiac tamponade (1.5% vs 0.6%; P=.009), men showed a higher incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (14.5% vs 17.4%; P=.009). There was no difference in all-cause mortality either in hospital (3.6% vs 3.6%, adjusted OR, 1.01; 95%CI, 0.83-1.23; P=.902), at 30 days (4.2% vs 4.2%, adjusted OR, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.65-1.25; P=.564) or at 1 year (11% vs 13%, adjusted HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.80-1.11; P=.60). CONCLUSIONS: Women treated with TAVI are older and have more comorbidities than men, leading to distinct complications between genders. Nevertheless, all-cause mortality in the short-term and at 1-year was similar between men and women.

Medically Treated Nonischemic Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma Lesions Versus Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization in Diabetic Patients.

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an established method to guide decisions on revascularization; however, in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), FFR-negative lesions carrying an optical coherence tomography-detected thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) remain at high risk for adverse cardiac events. Methods: In this prespecified subanalysis of the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial, DM patients with ≥1 FFR-negative, TCFA-positive medically treated target lesions referred to as vulnerable plaque (VP group), were compared to patients with exclusively FFR-positive target lesions who underwent complete revascularization (CR group). The primary endpoint was first and recurrent event analysis for target lesion failure and the secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or hospitalization due to unstable angina. Results: Among 550 patients enrolled, 98 belonged to the VP group while 93 to the CR group and were followed up to 5 years. The VP group had a higher occurrence of the primary endpoint (20.4% vs 8.6%; HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 0.98-5.04; P = .06). Recurrent event analysis showed that the VP group had significantly higher rates of the primary and secondary endpoints (9.17 vs 3.76 events per 100 PY; RR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.16-5.60; P = .01 and 13.45 vs 5.63 events per 100 PY; RR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.30-4.62; P < .01). Conclusions: In a population with DM, medically treated nonischemic, TCFA-carrying target lesions were associated with higher risk of reoccurring adverse cardiac events compared to target lesions that underwent complete revascularization, opening the discussion about whether a focal preventive revascularization strategy could be contemplated for highly vulnerable lesions.

Increased Incidence of Adverse Events in Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Combined Multiple Vulnerable Plaque Features. New Insights From the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the individual as well as combined impact of OCT-detected vulnerability features (OCT-VFs) in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-ischemic lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS AND RESULTS: The COMBINE OCT-FFR (NCT02989740) was a prospective, double-blind, international, natural history study that included patients with DM having ≥1 lesions with a fractional flow reserve >0.80, undergoing systematic OCT assessment. Pre-specified OCT-VFs included TCFA, r-MLA, h-PB, and CP. The primary endpoint (MACE) was a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, clinically driven target lesion revascularization or hospitalization for unstable angina up to 5 years, analyzed according to the presence of these OCT-VFs, both individually and in combination. TCFA, r-MLA, h-PB and CP were identified in 98 (25.1%), 159 (40.8%), 56 (14.4%), and 116 (29.8%) patients, respectively. The primary endpoint rate increased progressively from 6.9% to 50.0% (HR=10.10; 95%CI, 3.37 to 30.25, p<0.001) in patients without OCT-VFs compared to those with concomitant h-PB, r-MLA, CP, and TCFA. Importantly, while TCFA, h-PB, r-MLA and CP were individually associated with the primary endpoint, the presence of two or more OCT-VFs significantly increased the likelihood of adverse events at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DM and non-ischemic lesions, TCFA, h-PB, r-MLA and CP were predictors of adverse events. However, the presence of two or more OCT-VFs significantly increased the likelihood of MACE at 5 years. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings and their potential clinical implications in a randomized fashion.

Optical coherence tomography predictors of clinical outcomes after stent implantation: the ILUMIEN IV trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Observational registries have suggested that optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging-derived parameters may predict adverse events after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The present analysis sought to determine the OCT predictors of clinical outcomes from the large-scale ILUMIEN IV trial. METHODS: ILUMIEN IV was a prospective, single-blind trial of 2487 patients with diabetes or high-risk lesions randomized to OCT-guided versus angiography-guided DES implantation. All patients underwent final OCT imaging (blinded in the angiography-guided arm). From more than 20 candidates, the independent OCT predictors of 2-year target lesion failure (TLF; the primary endpoint), cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), and stent thrombosis were analysed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression in single treated lesions. RESULTS: A total of 2128 patients had a single treated lesion with core laboratory-analysed final OCT. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates of TLF, cardiac death or TV-MI, ID-TLR, and stent thrombosis were 6.3% (n = 130), 3.3% (n = 68), 4.3% (n = 87), and 0.9% (n = 18), respectively. The independent predictors of 2-year TLF were a smaller minimal stent area (per 1 mm2 increase: hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.89, P < .0001) and proximal edge dissection (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.20-2.62, P = .004). The independent predictors of cardiac death or TV-MI were smaller minimal stent area and longer stent length; of ID-TLR were smaller intra-stent flow area and proximal edge dissection; and of stent thrombosis was smaller minimal stent expansion. CONCLUSIONS: In the ILUMIEN IV trial, the most important OCT-derived post-DES predictors of both safety and effectiveness outcomes were parameters related to stent area, expansion and flow, proximal edge dissection, and stent length.

Diaphragmatic Paralysis After Heterotopic Bicaval Stenting.

Heterotopic bicaval stenting offers an alternative therapeutic approach for indirectly addressing the systemic effects of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with severe symptomatic TR, despite optimal medical therapy. In this report, we describe 2 cases of procedure-related unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, a clinically important complication not previously documented in the literature.

Long-Term Results of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) provide similar results to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) but are inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES) at 1 year. However, the long-term efficacy of BVS in these patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in patients with ISR. METHODS: RIBS VI (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment; NCT02672878) and RIBS VI Scoring (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment With Scoring Balloon; NTC03069066) are prospective multicenter studies designed to evaluate the results of BVS in patients with ISR (N = 220). The inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical to those used in the RIBS IV (ISR of DES) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Drug-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239940) and RIBS V (ISR of bare-metal stents) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239953) randomized trials (including 249 ISR patients treated with DCBs and 249 ISR patients treated with DES). A prespecified comparison of the long-term results obtained with these treatment modalities (ie, DES, DCBs, and BVS) was performed. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up at 3 years was obtained in all (100%) 718 patients. The 3-year target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was 14.1% (vs 12.9% after DCBs [not significant], and 5.2% after DES [HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.47-5.36; P = 0.001]). In a landmark analysis (>1 year), the target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was higher than after DES (adjusted HR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.15-10.08) and DCBs (adjusted HR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.14-9.70). Very late vessel thrombosis was also more frequent with BVS (BVS: 1.8%, DCBs: 0.4%, DES: 0%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, late clinical results of DES are superior to those obtained with DCBs and BVS. Beyond the first year, DCBs are safer and more effective than BVS.

Outcomes With Limus- vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the outcomes with limus drug-coated balloons (DCBs) vs paclitaxel DCBs were small and underpowered for clinical endpoints. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes with limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed through January 2024 for RCTs comparing limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for PCI. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were late angiographic findings. Summary estimates were constructed using a random effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 821 patients were included; 446 patients received a limus DCB, and 375 patients received a paclitaxel DCB. There was no difference between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs in the incidence of TLR at a mean of 13.4 months (10.3% vs 7.8%; risk ratio [RR]: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.84-2.08). Subgroup analysis suggested no significant interaction among studies for de novo coronary lesions vs in-stent restenosis (Pinteraction = 0.58). There were no differences in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac mortality, or target vessel myocardial infarction between groups. However, limus DCBs were associated with a higher risk of binary restenosis (RR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.14-3.12), late lumen loss (mean difference = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.28), and a smaller minimum lumen diameter (mean difference = -0.12; 95% CI: -0.22 to -0.02) at late follow-up. In addition, late lumen enlargement occurred more frequently (50% vs 27.5%; RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.77) with paclitaxel DCBs. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing DCB-only PCI, there were no differences in the risk of clinically driven TLR and other clinical outcomes between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs. However, paclitaxel DCBs were associated with better late angiographic outcomes. These findings support the need for future trials to establish the role of new-generation limus DCBs for PCI.

Vulnerable plaque features and adverse events in patients with diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis of the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial.

BACKGROUND: Thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) lesions are associated with a high risk of future major adverse cardiovascular events. However, the impact of other optical coherence tomography-detected vulnerability features (OCT-VFs) and their interplay with TCFA in predicting adverse events remains unknown. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the individual as well as the combined prognostic impact of OCT-VFs in predicting the incidence of the lesion-oriented composite endpoint (LOCE) in non-ischaemic lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: COMBINE OCT-FFR (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02989740) was a prospective, double-blind, international, natural history study that included DM patients with ≥1 non-culprit lesions with a fractional flow reserve>0.80 undergoing systematic OCT assessment. OCT-VFs included the following: TCFA, reduced minimal lumen area (r-MLA), healed plaque (HP), and complicated plaque (CP). The primary endpoint, LOCE - a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularisation up to 5 years - was analysed according to the presence of these OCT-VFs, both individually and in combination. RESULTS: TCFA, r-MLA, HP and CP were identified in 98 (25.3%), 190 (49.0%), 87 (22.4%), and 116 (29.9%) patients, respectively. The primary endpoint rate increased progressively from 6.3% to 55.6% (hazard ratio 15.2, 95% confidence interval: 4.53-51.0; p<0.001) in patients without OCT-VFs as compared to patients with concomitant HP, r-MLA, CP, and TCFA. The coexistence of TCFA with other OCT-VFs resulted in an increased risk of the LOCE at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In DM patients with non-ischaemic lesions, TCFA was the strongest predictor of future LOCE events. However, lesions that present additional OCT-VFs are associated with a higher risk of adverse events than OCT-detected TCFA alone. Further randomised studies are warranted to confirm these findings and their potential clinical implications.