Perioperative sildenafil therapy in pulmonary hypertension associated with congenital cardiac disease: An updated meta-analysis.

To provide an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sildenafil on pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with congenital heart disease (CHD). To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil, five outcomes, time duration of post-operative need for mechanical ventilation, time duration of post-operative ICU stay, length of hospitalization (LOH), the incidence of mortalities and pulmonary arterial pressure to aortic pressure ratio (PAP/AoP) were regarded as primary efficacy outcomes. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for continuous data. In comparison to the control group (CG), there was a significant decrease in the time duration of ICU stay in the sildenafil group (SG) (SMD = -0.61 [95% CI -1.17, 0.04]; P < 0.01, I2 = 85%). Length of hospitalization was assessed in the sildenafil and control groups (SMD = -0.18 [95% CI -0.67, 0.31] P = 0.05, I2 = 62%). However, there was no significant difference seen in mortality rates between the SG and CG (SMD = 0.53 [ 95% CI 0.13, 2.17] p = 0.61, I2 = 0%), in the time duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation between the SG and CG (SMD = -0.23 [95% CI -0.49, 0.03] p = 0.29, I2 = 19%), or PAP/AoP ratio between the SG and CG (SMD = -0.42 [95% CI -1.35, 0.51] P < 0.01, I2 = 90%). Based on our analysis, sildenafil has little to no effect in reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality due to PH in infants and children with CHD.

Efficacy of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Intravascular imaging (IVI) namely intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), presents as a promising imaging modality for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation compared to the gold-standard conventional two-dimensional angiography. IVI provides detailed information on vessel lumen, lesion length, and degree of calcification. For this purpose, we conducted a meta-analysis by pooling recently conducted randomized control trials (RCTs) to compare IVI with angiography for DES implantation. Scopus and MEDLINE were searched till May 2023 for RCTs comparing IVI with traditional angiography-guided stent implantation in coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome of interest was target-lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcomes included target vessel revascularization (TVR), all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A random-effects meta-analysis with metaregression was performed to derive risk ratios with corresponding 95% CIs from dichotomous data. Fourteen RCTs with a total of 8946 CAD patients (IVI 4751 vs angiography 4195; mean age 61.7 years) and a median follow-up of 15 months (12-24.3) were included. IVI was associated with significantly reduced TLR (RR 0.63 [0.49, 0.79]) vs conventional angiography. Similarly, TVR incidence (RR 0.66 [0.53, 0.83]), and MACE (RR 0.69 [0.58, 0.78]) were also significantly decreased with IVI vs conventional angiography for PCI. However, no significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between the 2 imaging modalities (RR 0.85 [0.63, 1.15]). Metaregression analysis showed no significant impact of follow-up duration, baseline comorbidities such as hypertension, smoking status, previous MI, and stent length on TLR incidence. IVI was associated with improved clinical outcomes in terms of reduced TLR, TVR, and MACE incidence when compared with traditional angiography in CAD patients for stent implantation.

Current Evidence and Future Perspectives of the Best Supplements for Cardioprotection: Have We Reached the Final Chapter for Vitamins?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), a broad-spectrum term comprising coronary artery disease, stroke, hypertension, and heart failure, presents as one of the most significant strains on global healthcare systems. Coronary artery disease, caused by atherosclerosis, has various modifiable risk factors such as dietary changes and exercise. Since these risk factors are found to be linked to oxidative stress and inflammations, the dietary supplementation with vitamins' role in treating and preventing the diseases has been of much debate. With various vitamins having anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties, studies have explored their correlation with cardiovascular health. Therefore, this narrative review explores and evaluates the benefits and risks of all vitamin supplementations in patients with CVD and provides future recommendations.