Development of Radiographic Radiation Pneumonitis (RP) in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) May Be Protective Against Further Disease Progression.

OBJECTIVES: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a local inflammatory response, and we hypothesize that RP serves as an immune stimulator and is a protective factor against disease progression.  Methods: We analyzed patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at two institutions. Radiographic RP (RRP) was evaluated and maximal axial dimensions were measured at three-, six-, and twelve-month timepoints with surveillance CT. RRP was measured using radiographic markers such as ground-glass opacities and airspace consolidation. Disease recurrence was evaluated and categorized as local, regional, and distant.  Results: Seventy-seven unique patient records were randomly selected from the database, 72 patients (93.5%) had RRP and five patients (6.5%) did not. The median follow-up was 24.3 months (IQR: 12.0 - 41.9). Disease failure occurred in 28.6% of patients with 6.5% local only, 2.6% regional only, 7.8% distant only, and 11.7% with multiple recurrences. Patients with RRP demonstrated a lower rate of disease failure with 25.0% of those with RRP experiencing disease failure and 80% of those without RRP experiencing disease failure (p=0.02). Patients with RRP had a 71% reduced risk of disease recurrence, compared to patients with no RRP, after adjusting for maximum tumor dimension (HR 0.29, p = 0.05). Among patients with RRP, there was no significant difference in recurrence based on extent of RRP (maximal area of RRP on CT). RRP did not correlate with overall survival.  Discussion: Most patients who received SBRT had RRP, and this study suggests that it may be protective of cancer recurrence. These results are hypothesis-generating and will need to be validated in larger and independent datasets.

Influence of Dexamethasone Premedication on Acute Lung Toxicity in Lung SBRT.

Introduction: The cooperative group experience of thoracic sterotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in medically inoperable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) historically utilized corticosteroid premedication. Patterns of care have been mixed as to whether premedication adds benefit in terms of improved lung toxicity and treatment tolerance. Methods: Patients treated for NSCLC from 2014 to 2017 with definitive thoracic SBRT (BED10≥100) at a single institution, in a prospectively collected database were evaluated. Pretreatment clinicopathologic characteristics, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, PFT parameters of FEV1, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were collected. Treatment and dosimetric characteristics were collected, and patients were scored as to whether dexamethasone was prescribed and utilized with each fraction. Toxicity was graded on multiple domains including lung as during and 30 days after completion of treatment using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4. Univariate analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and two-tailed Student's t-test for continuous variables. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards model to adjust for age, pretreatment DLCO, ECOG, tumor size, central versus peripheral location, and biological effective dose. Results: A total of 86 patients treated with thoracic SBRT with 54-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions met inclusion criteria, with the majority (70%) receiving 5 fractions. Of these patients, 45 (52%) received 4 mg dexamethasone premedication prior to each fraction of SBRT and 41 (48%) were treated without dexamethasone premedication. Overall acute lung toxicity was low in both groups. Between the two groups of patients, 5/45 (11%) developed grade 2 or higher lung toxicity including hospital admission in the dexamethasone premedication arm vs. 2/41 (5%) without premedication (p = 0.4370, Fisher's exact test). Freedom from acute SBRT lung toxicity was no different between dexamethasone premedication arm and no premedication (Log rank, p = 0.45). On multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusting for age, ECOG, tumor size, central vs. peripheral location, pretreatment DLCO, and BED, there was no difference in freedom from acute lung toxicity without dexamethasone premedication (HR: 0.305; 95% CI: 0.033, 2.792; p = 0.293). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, pretreatment steroid prophylaxis with dexamethasone confers a similar acute toxicity profile and no added clinical benefit to treatment without pretreatment steroid prophylaxis.

Radiation Toxicity in Patients With Collagen Vascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies.

PURPOSE: Several retrospective series have reported that patients with collagen vascular disease (CVD) are at increased risk of radiation (RT) toxicity. However, the evidence is mixed, and many series lack control groups. We performed a meta-analysis including only case-cohort or randomized studies that examined the risk of RT toxicity for patients with CVD compared with controls. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used to perform a comprehensive search identifying case-control or randomized studies reporting RT toxicity outcomes for patients with CVD versus controls. Data were synthesized from studies reporting grade 2 to 3 or more (G2/3 +) acute and late RT toxicities. Results were analyzed with fixed effects meta-analysis on the random-effects model for between-study heterogeneity; otherwise, the fixed-effects model was used. Hazard ratio or odds ratio (OR) were the effect-size estimators, as appropriate. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, with 4028 patients (CVD: 406, control: 3622). Patients with CVD had higher rates of acute G2/3 + toxicity (26.2% vs 16.5%, OR [odds ratio] 2.01; P < .001) and late G2/3 + toxicity (18.4% vs 10.1%, OR 2.37; P < .001). Higher rates of late G2/3 + toxicity were observed for CVD patients with systemic lupus erythematous (21% vs 9.7%; OR 2.55, P = .03), systemic scleroderma (31.8% vs 9.7%, OR 3.85; P = .03), rheumatoid arthritis (11.7% vs 8.4%, OR = 2.56; P = .008), and those irradiated to the pelvis/abdomen (32.2% vs 11.9%, OR 3.29; P = .001), breast (14.7% vs 4.4%, OR 3.51; P = .003), thorax (12.5% vs 8.7%, OR 3.46; P < .001), and skin (14.6% vs 5.2%, OR 2.59; P = .02). Late grade 5 toxicities were significantly higher for patients with CVD, although absolute rates were low (3.9% vs 0.6%, OR = 7.81; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate and severe toxicities are more likely in patients with CVD, with variable risk depending on toxicity grade, CVD subtype, treatment site, and dose. Severe toxicities are uncommon. These factors should be considered when informing patients of treatment-related risks and monitoring for morbid treatment sequelae.

Impact of Concurrent Coincident Use of Metformin During Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Introduction Recent data suggest synergy of chemoradiotherapy and metformin in locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It remains unclear if similar synergy exists with stereotactic lung body radiation therapy (SBRT) and metformin. We analyzed the role of metformin on progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity in the setting of lung SBRT. Methods We identified 31 patients on metformin-treated with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. Eighty-nine similarly treated patients were chosen as controls. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate cumulative PFS probabilities. Results Median follow-up was 30.7 months. Forty-two patients had diabetes, 31 (74%) of which were taking metformin concurrent with SBRT. Median PFS for metformin-users vs. metformin non-users was 36.4 months vs 48.9 months, respectively (p = 0.29). Among diabetic patients, median PFS for metformin users was 36.4 months and was unobserved for non-users (p= 0.40). On univariable analysis, male sex (p = 0.03) and tumor size (p = 0.01) were associated with the risk of progression or death; use of metformin was not significant (p = 0.34). There was no difference in grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis between metformin users vs non-users (p = 0.51) Conclusion In this retrospective sample of lung SBRT patients, we did not detect a meaningful effect of concurrent metformin use on PFS. Since SBRT and conventional RT may have different cell kill mechanisms, the previously described beneficial effects of metformin may not apply in a hypofractionated setting. These results should be validated in an independent dataset, and we await the results of ongoing clinical trials.

Pretreatment Factors Influencing Radiation Pneumonitis after Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer.

Objective Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a dose-limiting toxicity that affects the treatment of lung cancer. Data on factors predictive of developing symptomatic RP after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are limited. We reviewed data to identify pretreatment factors predictive of the development of symptomatic RP in patients' lung cancer treated with SBRT. Methods Data were collected on 296 patients treated with SBRT for lung cancer. Factors available at time of consultation were analyzed for the development of symptomatic RP, defined as CTCAE v. 4.0 ≥ Grade 2. The factors analyzed included patient demographic, tumor-specific, and pretreatment pulmonary function data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess for predictive factors. Results Median follow-up was 22 months. The rate of symptomatic RP was 16%. Univariate analysis showed an increased rate of symptomatic RP with treatments to the right lung (22% vs. 9%, p = 0.007), driven primarily by an increased rate of symptomatic RP when treating the right lower lobe (RLL) vs. other lobes (31 vs. 13%, p = 0.03). Patients with a history of prior lung directed therapy were also more likely to develop symptomatic RP (12% vs. 24%, p = 0.008). These statistical differences were retained on multivariate analysis. Conclusion SBRT to the right lung, especially the RLL, and to patients with a history of prior lung-directed therapy increases the risk of developing symptomatic RP after SBRT. Further studies on ways to predict and prevent symptomatic RP are needed.

Consolidation radiotherapy following positron emission tomography complete response in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis.

Despite a number of randomized trials, there is clinical equipoise whether de-escalation with the omission of radiotherapy (RT) in positron emission tomography (PET) responders is safe in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). A comprehensive Medline and conference abstracts search was performed to identify prospective studies with the following criteria: early-stage (stage I/II) HL treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy with PET-directed randomization to ± consolidation RT. Four studies were meta-analyzed with a total of 2267 patients (RT: n = 1136, no RT: n = 1131). Pooled analysis showed a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with RT (HR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.27- 3.43 p = .004, RE). There was no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit with RT for all patients (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.37-2.30, p = 0.85), nor in favorable (HR = 0.90, p = .89) or unfavorable risk (HR = 1.01, p = .99). In early-stage PET-negative HL, consolidative RT consistently improves PFS across risk stratifications over PET-directed omission of RT, with no significant impact on OS.

Predictors of Distant Failure After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stages I to IIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as an effective treatment modality for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with excellent local control rates. Despite this, there is a predominant pattern of distant failure. We sought to identify factors that help predict which patients with stages I to IIA NSCLC treated with SBRT are at highest risk of distant failure, so that we may utilize these factors in the future to help determine which patients may benefit from the addition of systemic therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients treated with SBRT for early stage NSCLC from 2006 to 2016 at 2 institutions. Patients were classified by T stage, tumor size, location and histology, pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) standardized uptake value (SUV), smoking status, and age. The primary endpoint of the study was distant failure. We aimed to analyze if patient characteristics could be identified that predicted for distant failure through the use of competing risk analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 21.9 months. The median dose of radiation and fractionation delivered was 50 Gy (range, 45-65 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 3-13 fractions). The median patient age was 72.8 years (interquartile range, 65.4-79.7 years). The 2-year distant failure was 22.0%, and overall survival at 2 years was found to be 61.0%. For every 1-year increase in patient age, the hazard of distant failure at any given time was 3% lower (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P = .04). None of the remaining characteristics emerged as significant risk factors for distant failure on univariable or multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our cohort had distant failure and survival rates comparable with what has been described in the literature. Although we were unable to identify factors outside of age that correlated to risk of distant failure, this topic warrants further investigation, as distant failure is the primary pattern of failure with SBRT when used as the primary management for early-stage NSCLC. Additional molecular studies are needed to further inform on the role of systemic therapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC to improve clinical outcomes.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy Versus Wait-and-See Strategy for Pathologic T3 or Margin-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) to wait-and-see (WS) strategy in pathologic T3 or margin-positive prostate cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive EMBASE, MEDLINE, http://www.clinicaltrails.gov, and Cochrane Library search for RCTs of ART versus WS was done. Results were synthesized for metastasis-free, biochemical progression-free, clinical progression-free, hormone-free, and overall survival as well as gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities. Either random-effects model or fixed-effects model were used based on the test of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Three RCTs (EORTC22911, SWOG8794, ARO96-02/AUO-AP09/95) were identified with 1737 patients. ART resulted in greater biochemical progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.48, P<0.00001) including benefit in all subsets, greater clinical progression-free survival (HR=0.73, P=0.0003) including benefit in subsets with margin-positive or seminal vesicle invasion and, greater hormone-free survival (HR=0.64, 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.80, P=0.0001). Ten-year metastasis-free survival was significantly improved with ART (odds ratio=0.77, P=0.02). There was no survival benefit (HR=0.97; P=0.89). With ART compared with WS, there was significantly increased toxicity of any grade (50% vs. 38.6%), grade 2 or greater GU toxicity (17.1% vs. 10.3%), grade 2 or greater GI toxicity (2.5% vs. 1.1%), urinary stricture rates (11.1% vs. 5.7%) and, urinary incontinence (6.9% vs. 2.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year metastasis-free survival is significantly improved with ART compared with WS. Biochemical progression-free, clinical progression-free, and hormone-free survival were also improved with ART. Grade 2 or higher GI and GU toxicities were greater in ART. Therefore, ART should be offered to patients with these high-risk features.

Delineating the relationship between Point A prescription dose and pelvic lymph node doses in intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer for use in low- and middle-income countries.

PURPOSE: To define the relationship between the Point A prescription dose and the dose delivered to various pelvic lymph node groups during high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer. In less developed countries, brachytherapy is often done without three-dimensional image guidance, instead relying on plain radiography and prescription to Point A. A defined relationship between Point A dose and lymph node doses would help physicians in these health care settings to more accurately estimate nodal doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment data from 50 fractions of HDR brachytherapy of cervical cancer were reviewed, the pelvic lymph nodes were contoured, and dose-volume histogram parameters were obtained. Dose-volume histogram parameters for each contour were normalized as a percentage of the corresponding Point A dose. All nodal groups were divided into left and right sides, except the presacral nodal group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mean Point A doses were bilateral (Bil) 5.92 Gy ± 0.58, left (L) 5.93 ± 0.59, and right (R) 5.92 ± 0.59. Mean normalized D90 values for the various lymph node groups were as follows-obturator: Bil 20.3% ± 4.5, L 20.5% ± 4.4, and R 20.2% ± 5.2; external iliac: Bil 9.5% ± 2.9, L 10.0% ± 3.1, and R 9.5% ± 3.0; internal iliac: Bil 12.2% ± 3.5, L 12.1% ± 3.4, and R 12.9% ± 4.7; common iliac: Bil 4.3% ± 1.6, L 4.3% ± 1.6, and R 4.3% ± 1.7; and presacral: 8.7% ± 3.4. These relationships can serve as a useful tool for evaluating lymph node doses during HDR brachytherapy of cervical cancer in facilities performing two-dimensional treatment planning and those with limited resources.

Decreased Risk of Radiation Pneumonitis With Coincident Concurrent Use of Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Patients Receiving Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) have demonstrated decreased rates of radiation-induced lung injury in animal models and clinical reports have demonstrated decreased pneumonitis in the setting of conventionally fractionated radiation to the lung. We tested the role of ACEi in diminishing rates of symptomatic (grade ≥2) pneumonitis in the setting of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: We analyzed patients treated with thoracic SBRT to 48 to 60 Gy in 4 to 5 fractions from 2006 to 2014. We reviewed pretreatment and posttreatment medication profiles to document use of ACEi, angiotensin receptor blockers, bronchodilators, aspirin, PDE-5 inhibitors, nitrates, and endothelin receptor antagonists. Pneumonitis was graded posttreatment based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and time to development of pneumonitis was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were evaluated with a median follow-up of 24.8 months. The overall 1-year rate of symptomatic pneumonitis was 13.2%. The 1-year rate of symptomatic pneumonitis was 4.2% for ACEi users versus 16.3% in nonusers (P=0.03). On univariate analysis, the odds of developing grade 2 or greater pneumonitis were significantly lower for patients on ACEi (P=0.03). On multivariate analysis, after controlling for clinicopathologic characteristics and dosimetric endpoints, there was a significant association between ACEi use and decreased risk of clinical pneumonitis (P=0.04). Angiotensin receptor blockers or other bronchoactive medications did not show significant associations with development of pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental concurrent use of ACEi demonstrated efficacy in diminishing rates of symptomatic pneumonitis in the setting of lung SBRT.

Multi-institutional experience of stereotactic body radiotherapy for large (≥5 centimeters) non-small cell lung tumors.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for patients with nonoperative, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) measuring < 5 cm, but its use among patients with tumors measuring ≥5 cm is considerably less defined, with the existing literature limited to small, single-institution reports. The current multi-institutional study reported outcomes evaluating the largest such population reported to date. METHODS: Clinical/treatment characteristics, outcomes, toxicities, and patterns of failure were assessed in patients with primary NSCLC measuring ≥5 cm without evidence of distant/lymph node metastasis who underwent SBRT using ≤5 fractions. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients treated from 2004 through 2016 were analyzed from 12 institutions. The median follow-up was 12 months (15 months in survivors). The median age and tumor size among the patients were 73 years (range, 50-95 years) and 5.4 cm (range, 5.0-7.5 cm), respectively. The median dose/fractionation was 50 Gray/5 fractions. The actuarial local control rates at 1 year and 2 years were 95.7% and 73.2%, respectively. The disease-free survival rate was 72.1% and 53.5%, respectively, at 1 year and 2 years. The 1-year and 2-year disease-specific survival rates were 95.5% and 78.6%, respectively. The median, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival rates were 21.4 months, 76.2%, and 46.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, lung cancer history and pre-SBRT positron emission tomography maximum standardized uptake value were found to be associated with overall survival. Posttreatment failures were most commonly distant (33% of all disease recurrences), followed by local (26%) and those occurring elsewhere in the lung (23%). Three patients had isolated local failures. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities included 1 case (1%) and 4 cases (4%) of grade 3 dermatitis and radiation pneumonitis, respectively (toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Grades 2 to 5 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 11% of patients. One patient with a tumor measuring 7.5 cm and a smoking history of 150 pack-years died of radiation pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study, which is the largest study of patients with NSCLC measuring ≥5 cm reported to date, indicate that SBRT is a safe and efficacious option. Cancer 2017;123:688-696. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Observer Evaluation of a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm Applied to Head and Neck Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Images.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: To quantify, through an observer study, the reduction in metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images using a projection-interpolation algorithm, on images containing metal artifacts from dental fillings and implants in patients treated for head and neck (H&N) cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An interpolation-substitution algorithm was applied to H&N CBCT images containing metal artifacts from dental fillings and implants. Image quality with respect to metal artifacts was evaluated subjectively and objectively. First, 6 independent radiation oncologists were asked to rank randomly sorted blinded images (before and after metal artifact reduction) using a 5-point rating scale (1 = severe artifacts; 5 = no artifacts). Second, the standard deviation of different regions of interest (ROI) within each image was calculated and compared with the mean rating scores. RESULTS: The interpolation-substitution technique successfully reduced metal artifacts in 70% of the cases. From a total of 60 images from 15 H&N cancer patients undergoing image guided radiation therapy, the mean rating score on the uncorrected images was 2.3 ± 1.1, versus 3.3 ± 1.0 for the corrected images. The mean difference in ranking score between uncorrected and corrected images was 1.0 (95% confidence interval: 0.9-1.2, P<.05). The standard deviation of each ROI significantly decreased after artifact reduction (P<.01). Moreover, a negative correlation between the mean rating score for each image and the standard deviation of the oral cavity and bilateral cheeks was observed. CONCLUSION: The interpolation-substitution algorithm is efficient and effective for reducing metal artifacts caused by dental fillings and implants on CBCT images, as demonstrated by the statistically significant increase in observer image quality ranking and by the decrease in ROI standard deviation between uncorrected and corrected images.

Local control dependence on consecutive vs. nonconsecutive fractionation in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports demonstrate impaired tumor re-oxygenation 24-48h after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), suggesting that non-consecutive treatment delivery may be advantageous. To test this hypothesis clinically, we compared local control in patients treated in consecutive daily fractions vs. nonconsecutive fractions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 107 lung SBRT patients (117 tumors) treated for T1-T2N0 NSCLC with LINAC based SBRT (50 or 60Gy/5fractions). Patients were characterized as having been treated in consecutive daily fractions vs. in non-consecutive fractions. Local control, survival and toxicity end points (CTCAE V4.0) were compared. Propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses were performed in order to determine the effect of fractionation on local control. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 23.7months, 3-year local control was superior at 93.3% vs. 63.6% in the non-consecutive and consecutive group, respectively (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis and propensity score matching showed that consecutive fractionation was an independent predictor of local failure. Overall survival trended toward improvement in the non-consecutive group, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.188). Development of any grade 2 toxicity was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.75). CONCLUSION: Five-fraction SBRT delivered over non-consecutive days imparts superior LC and similar toxicity compared to consecutive fractionation. These results should be validated in independent datasets and in a prospective fashion.

Combination Trimodality Therapy Using Vismodegib for Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Face.

Background. For large basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) of the head and neck, definitive surgery often requires extensive resection and reconstruction that may result in prolonged recovery and limited cosmesis. Vismodegib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the hedgehog pathway, is approved for advanced and metastatic BCCs. We present a case of advanced BCC treated with combination of vismodegib, radiotherapy, and local excision resulting in excellent response and cosmesis. Case Presentation. A 64-year-old gentleman presented with a 5-year history of a 7 cm enlarging right cheek mass, with extensive vascularization, central ulceration, and skin, soft tissue, and buccal mucosa involvement. Biopsy revealed BCC, nodular type. Up-front surgical option involved a large resection and reconstruction. After multidisciplinary discussion, we recommended and he opted for combined modality of vismodegib, radiotherapy, and local excision. The patient tolerated vismodegib well and his right cheek lesion decreased significantly in size. He was then treated with radiotherapy followed by local excision that revealed only focal residual BCC. Currently, he is without evidence of disease and has excellent cosmesis. Conclusions. We report a case of locally advanced BCC treated with trimodality therapy with vismodegib, radiotherapy, and local excision, resulting in excellent outcome and facial cosmesis, without requiring extensive resection or reconstructive surgery.

Image-Based Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Cervical cancer is a disease that requires considerable multidisciplinary coordination of care and labor in order to maximize tumor control and survival while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. As with external beam radiation therapy, the use of advanced imaging and 3-dimensional treatment planning has generated a paradigm shift in the delivery of brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer. The use of image-based brachytherapy, most commonly with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), requires additional attention and effort by the treating physician to prescribe dose to the proper volume and account for adjacent organs at risk. This represents a dramatic change from the classic Manchester approach of orthogonal radiographic images and prescribing dose to point A. We reviewed the history and currently evolving data and recommendations for the clinical use of image-based brachytherapy with an emphasis on MRI-based brachytherapy.

Leukemia Cutis of the Face, Scalp, and Neck Treated with Non-coplanar Split Field Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: A Case Report.

Malignancies with a superficial involvement of the scalp present a unique technical challenge for radiation treatment planning. As an example of this, leukemic infiltration of the superficial skin as the only presentation of the disease is a rare entity. For such cases, radiation oncologists have typically treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy with matched electron fields, a technique that can lead to significant dose inhomogeneity. In this report, we describe the case of a patient with leukemia cutis with a superficial involvement of the scalp, face, and shoulders that was treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy, with an impressive clinical response.

Tumor bed-to-skin distance using accelerated partial-breast irradiation with the strut-adjusted volume implant device.

PURPOSE: Because of the risk of skin toxicity with single dwell position, single-lumen brachytherapy devices are sometimes contraindicated for tumor cavities 5-7mm from the skin surface. We discuss the use of multicatheter device to treat patients with tumor bed-to-skin distances <7mm. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We treated 117 patients with accelerated partial-breast irradiation brachytherapy: 77 single-lumen and 40 multicatheter devices. A subset of 12 patients treated with SAVI(®) had bed-to-skin spacing <7mm. All patients had Tis-2N0 ductal carcinoma with negative margins. A total dose of 34.0Gy in 10 fractions was delivered twice daily. Planning target volume was created using computed tomography-based three-dimensional planning with a 1.0-cm expansion of the lumpectomy cavity. Skin dose was measured dosimetrically, with skin constraints <125% of the prescription. Toxicities were graded, and patients were assessed at various intervals. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with the multicatheter device, 0% (0/12) had their device pulled. At 2 weeks after treatment, fewer than 50% of the patients had skin toxicities of Grades 1-2, all of which resolved by 6 months. The cosmetic outcome was good to excellent at followup. CONCLUSIONS: Multicatheter devices permit well-tolerated accelerated partial-breast irradiation in patients with tumor cavities near the skin surface for which the single-lumen device may not be appropriate.