Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Therapie ; 77(1): 103-115, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35140023

RESUMEN

In the context of health technologies assessment, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become assessment criteria that are expected by evaluation agencies along with the other usual clinical criteria. PROMs instruments measure all aspects of patient experience in connection with their health: symptoms, activities of daily living (physical function, sleep, etc.), various aspects of health-related quality of life (QoL), compliance, global impression of change in wellbeing. PROMs are useful both as 1) a primary or secondary efficacy endpoints, and 2) a tolerability criterion to supplement vigilance data reported by clinicians. Measurement of PROMs must be subject to methodological rigor that is identical to that of other assessment criteria measured by an observer. Scales must be validated, suitable for the objective, and where possible specific to a disease. In addition to standard measures of quality of life, PROMs are taken into consideration in the assessments performed by the HAS, even if their impact on the conclusions is difficult to isolate, as assessments are multifactorial and take into account all data available with regard to the medical context. The CEPS will indirectly take into account PROMs in the fixing of the price or tariff only if they have contributed to the award of the ASA/ASMR by the ad hoc committee of the HAS. The working group has formulated three recommendations which aim to further the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures: (1) Better information for all parties involved in a dossier for technology assessment, (2) Systematization of the collection of PROMs for evaluation of health products, (3) Improved quality of dossiers thanks to the use of relevant and validated tools.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Calidad de Vida , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Francia , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente
4.
Euro Surveill ; 27(1)2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991778

RESUMEN

Europe has experienced a large COVID-19 wave caused by the Delta variant in winter 2021/22. Using mathematical models applied to Metropolitan France, we find that boosters administered to ≥ 65, ≥ 50 or ≥ 18 year-olds may reduce the hospitalisation peak by 25%, 36% and 43% respectively, with a delay of 5 months between second and third dose. A 10% reduction in transmission rates might further reduce it by 41%, indicating that even small increases in protective behaviours may be critical to mitigate the wave.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , COVID-19/prevención & control , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estaciones del Año , Vacunación
5.
Euro Surveill ; 26(26)2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34212840

RESUMEN

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS) has been identified as a rare adverse event following COVID-19 vaccination with Vaxzevria. We modelled the benefits and risks of Vaxzevria distribution from May to September 2021 in metropolitan France where other vaccines are available, considering French hospitalisation data and European data on TTS. Across different scenarios, benefits of Vaxzevria distribution in people 55 years and older exceeded the risk of death from COVID-19. In young adults, risks were at least of similar magnitude as benefits.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA