Association between Traditional Risk Factors and Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Study on 10057 Angiographic Procedures among Iranian Population.

BACKGROUND: Whether coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a unique clinical finding or results from other clinical entities is still unknown. We aimed to determine the CAE prevalence, investigate the relationship between CAE and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, and assess the prognosis at follow-up in a sample of Iranian population. METHODS: Totally, 10057 patients who underwent coronary angiography were divided into three categories: normal coronary arteries without co-existing coronary artery disease; CAE without co-existing coronary artery narrowing < 50%; and coronary artery stenosis with > 50% luminal narrowing (CAS). RESULTS: The prevalence of CAE was 1.5%. Compared to the normal individuals, the CAE patients were older, were more frequently male, and had higher rates of myocardial infarction (MI). The CAE patients had a lower frequency of diabetes and MI than the CAS group. The CAE patients were largely focused between 40 to 60 years of age. The right coronary and left anterior descending arteries were the most involved arteries, and ectasia was located more frequently in the proximal part of these arteries. Patients with ectasia in the three main vessels had higher rates of MI. After a mean follow-up of 54.23 ± 18.41 months, chest pain and dyspnea on exertion remained the main complaint in more than 97% of the patients, leading to hospital admission in more than 14%. CONCLUSION: There was no relationship between the presence of ectasia and conventional risk factors. According to our study, pure CAE may be deemed a benign feature of atherosclerosis; however, it can lead to frequent hospital admissions because of the persistence of cardiovascular symptoms.

Effectiveness of Two-Year versus One-Year Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Reducing the Risk of Very Late Stent Thrombosis after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Impact of 12 months' versus 24 months' use of dual antiplatelet therapy on the prevalence of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the drug-eluting stent (DES) is not clear. As a result, duration of dual antiplatelet therapy is still under debate among interventionists. METHODS: From March 2007 until August 2008, all consecutive patients with successful PCI who received at least one DES and were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (Clopidogrel + Aspirin) were included. All the patients were followed up for more than 24 months (mean = 35.27 ± 6.91 months) and surveyed for very late stent thrombosis and major cardiovascular events. RESULTS: From 961 patients eligible for the study, 399 (42%) discontinued Clopidogrel after 12 months and 562 (58%) continued Clopidogrel for 24 months. The clinical and procedural variables were compared between the two groups. In the 12 months' use group, two cases of definite thrombosis occurred at 18 and 13 months post PCI. In the 24 months' use group, 2 cases of definite thrombosis occurred at 14 and 28 months post PCI, one of them with stenting in a bifurcation lesion. Five cases of probable stent thrombosis were detected at 21, 28, 32, 33, and 34 months after the procedure. It is of note that amongst the 10 cases of stent thrombosis, only 1(10%) thrombosis occurred when the patient was on Clopidogrel and Aspirin and all the other 9 (90%) cases of thrombosis appeared after the discontinuation of the dual antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSION: Extended use of dual antiplatelet therapy (for more than 12 months) was not significantly more effective than Aspirin monotherapy in reducing the risk of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis, death from cardiac cause, and stroke.

On-label and off-label use of drug-eluting stents: comparison of short- and long-term outcomes.

In this retrospective study, we compared the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of the on-label and off-label uses of drug-eluting stents.From April 2003 through June 2007, 1,538 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent (sirolimus or paclitaxel) at Tehran Heart Center. Off-label implantation of the drug-eluting stent was as implemented on the basis of specific clinical and procedural characteristics set forth in our text. There were 708 patients in the on-label group and 830 in the off-label group.Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Histories of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting were more prevalent in the off-label group. Both groups had similar procedural and in-hospital complications. The follow-up rate at 1 year was 93.1% in the on-label group and 93.3% in the off-label group. During that period, the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events was not significantly different between the groups. After 1 year between the respective on- and off-label uses of the sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents, and after adjustment for diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting, there was no remarkable difference in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio, 0.688; 95% confidence interval, 0.365-1.295; P=0.2463) or target-vessel revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.291-1.636; P=0.3993).We found that off-label use of drug-eluting stents was safe after 1 year and that such use was not associated with increased in-hospital myocardial infarction or death.

Ostial lesions of left main and right coronary arteries: demographic and angiographic features.

In 258 patients with left main tract disease, the atherosclerotic risk factors were compared between patients with ostial and nonostial lesions of the left main coronary artery. Also, it was done for patients with ostial right coronary artery. Women were more likely to have ostial left main coronary artery and/or ostial right coronary artery. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the female sex (odds ratio: 2.336) and hypertriglyceridemia (odds ratio: 1.004) were independent risk factors of ostial left main coronary artery lesion. For ostial right coronary artery lesion, the female sex and family history of coronary artery disease were independent predictors. Ostial left main coronary artery and right coronary artery lesions were strongly correlated. The demographic and clinical profiles of ostial stenosis suggest that this group may represent a distinct entity, different from the more common atherosclerotic left main trunk stenosis (LMTD). The female sex and serum triglyceride level can be considered as independent predictors of ostial left main tract disease.

Results of the repair of aortic false aneurysm.

Aortic false aneurysm is a rare complication of surgery of the aorta that can occur several months to years after the initial operation. We reviewed our results with false aneurysm repair using deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest. Three patients were reoperated for false aneurysm of the ascending aorta. Femorofemoral cardiopulmonary bypass with a heparinized system was used in all patients. Hypothermic circulatory arrest at an average temperature of 20 degrees C was instituted in all patients for repair. Two patients had a patch repair with pericardium, and the other one had primary repair of the defect. All patients had false aneurysms in the ascending aorta at the site of a previous aortotomy. Two patients had proven infection as the cause. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 183 +/- 20 minutes, and the mean circulatory arrest time was 35 minutes. Operative mortality was not seen. The mean time for extubation in survivors was 10 - 12 hours, and the average time to discharge was 26 days. Aortic false aneurysms can be safely approached using femorofemoral cardiopulmonary bypass, hypothermic circulatory arrest, and patch repair with acceptable operative mortality and long-term survival.