RESUMEN
AIM: Endometrial cancer is diagnosed by obtaining uterine biopsies by pipelle, dilatation and curettage (D&C), or hysteroscopy. In 15%-25% of the cases, the preoperative and postoperative grades do not match. This discrepancy may carry significant clinical and prognostic consequences. We aimed to assess how body mass index (BMI) affects preoperative and postoperative grade mismatches and whether biopsy methods mitigate this effect. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery at our center between 2014 and 2022. We stratified patients into six classes of BMI based on the WHO classification. Preoperative and postoperative grades were compared for concordance with regards to patient BMI and sampling method. RESULTS: A total of 158 patients were included, diagnosed by pipelle (n = 99), hysteroscopy (n = 15), or D&C (n = 44). For all methods, every unit increase in BMI increased the odds of having a gap between histology grades by 5.2%. In the pipelle group, the odds of a larger gap between the histology grades was 62% higher than that of women in the other groups. Among the D&C group, the odds of having a bigger difference between histology grades were 91.8% lower compared to the other groups. Patients with BMI over 30 had nearly 50% discrepancy when diagnosed with pipelle or hysteroscopy, but less than 10% with D&C. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing BMI is associated with decreasing concordance between preoperative and postoperative grades in endometrial cancer, especially when it exceeds 30. This effect is much less pronounced, however, when the diagnostic method is D&C.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Femenino , Endometrio/patología , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Dilatación y Legrado Uterino , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Biopsia/métodosRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of preemptive infiltration on postoperative pain and the use of analgesics after vaginal hysterectomy (VH). DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: An urogynecology unit in a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 120 patients who had undergone VH. INTERVENTIONS: The study group contained 60 patients who participated in a former randomized control study, in which preemptive local infiltration of bupivacaine (n = 30) or sodium chloride 0.9% (n = 30) was performed. The control group included 60 consecutive patients who underwent a VH, for whom no local infiltration was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative pain at rest was assessed using the 10 cm visual analog scale at 3, 8, and 24 hours after surgery. The levels of pain, as well as the use of analgesics, postoperatively, were compared between the groups. The mean surgery length in the infiltration group was shorter (86.4±29 vs 118.6±30, p <.001) and the rate of posterior colporrhaphy was lower (73.1% vs 91.3%, p = .010) than the control group. There were no differences in levels of pain at all points of time. However, the infiltration group required a lower morphine dose in the recovery unit (3.7 ± 2.3 mg vs 5.3 ± 2.4 mg, p <.001) and less use of analgesia (all kinds) 24 hours after surgery (54.2% vs 79.6%, p <.001) compared with the control group. On multivariant analysis, preemptive infiltration was found to be independently inversely associated with the dose of morphine used in recovery, as well as analgesics used 24 hours after surgery. CONCLUSION: Preemptive local infiltration of either bupivacaine or sodium chloride 0.9% reduced the use of morphine in the recovery unit, as well as the use of analgesics 24 hours after VH, compared with no infiltration at all.