Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 47(5): 596-604, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29239001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data on comparative effectiveness of adalimumab and infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). AIMS: To compare the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with CD, in a nationwide register-based propensity score-matched cohort study in Denmark. METHODS: A total of 2908 Danish adults with CD had been treated with adalimumab or infliximab as their first biologic agent between 2005-2014. By Cox regression, we compared rates of all-cause hospitalisation, CD-related hospitalisation, major abdominal surgery and serious infections after variable 2:1 propensity score matching, accounting for baseline disease characteristics, healthcare utilisation and use of CD-related medications. RESULTS: After propensity-score matching, we included 315 adalimumab- (34.9 ± 12.9 years, 41.9% males) and 512 infliximab-treated (33.6 ± 12.6 years, 40.8% males) patients, with median disease duration 4.0 years; 36.9% had prior abdominal surgery. Over a median follow-up 2.3 years after starting biological therapy, there were no significant differences in rate of CD-related hospitalisation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.55-1.20]) or major abdominal surgery (HR, 1.24 [0.66-2.33]) between adalimumab- and infliximab-treated patients, though rate of all-cause hospitalisation was lower in adalimumab-treated patients (HR, 0.74 [0.56-0.97]). There was no significant difference in incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalisation (HR, 1.06 [0.26-4.21]). These results were stable in patients treated with biological monotherapy (all-cause hospitalisation: HR, 0.75 [0.53-1.05]; CD-related hospitalisation: HR, 0.82 [0.51-1.32], abdominal surgery: HR, 1.47 [0.63-3.47]) or in combination with immunomodulators (all-cause hospitalisation: HR, 0.70 [0.44-1.11]; CD-related hospitalisation: HR, 0.80 [0.42-1.52], abdominal surgery: HR, 1.02 [0.39-2.64]). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based, propensity score matched, real-life cohort study using administrative claims, there was no significant difference in effectiveness and safety of adalimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with CD.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
2.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 36(9): 840-9, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22971016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) is administered every 8 weeks, but inter-patient variation in optimal treatment intervals may exist. AIM: To assess, in a prospective pilot study, the efficacy, safety and quality of life (QoL) of IFX maintenance treatment scheduled through web-based self-monitoring of disease activity. METHODS: Twenty-seven CD patients in IFX maintenance therapy were enrolled and received a standardised disease education and web-training. Using the http://www.cd.constant-care.dk concept, patients recorded their disease activity and faecal calprotectin weekly. From this, the inflammatory burden (IB) score was calculated, placing patients in the green, yellow or red zones of a 'traffic light' system. If placed in the yellow or red zones, the computer directed these patients to consult their physician for IFX infusion. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (63%) completed 52 weeks of follow-up, 6 (22%) completed 26 weeks and 4 (15%) were excluded due to loss of response, patient decision or non-adherence. In total, 121 IFX infusions were given with a median interval of 9 (range: 4­18) weeks. Only 10% of infusions were given at 8-week intervals, whereas 39% were administered with shorter and 50% with longer intervals respectively. The mean IB and the QoL remained stable during the web-treatment. One mild infusion reaction and one case of folliculitis were observed, while three patients underwent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The program http://www.cd.constant-care.dk appears to be a practical and safe concept for the individualised scheduling of maintenance treatment with IFX in patients with Crohn's disease. Larger studies are awaited to confirm this preliminary outcome.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Telemedicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Dinamarca , Femenino , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Infliximab , Internet , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoadministración/métodos , Autoadministración/psicología , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/psicología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA