Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(15): 6947-6955, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37606105

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of lung ultrasound (LUS) in cardiogenic pulmonary edema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search of databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, was performed to collect clinical studies on ultrasound diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema from inception to 23 March 2023. The number of patients with true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative cardiogenic pulmonary edema diagnosed by LUS was collected, and the R package was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of LUS. RESULTS: Nine pieces of literature were finally included with 2,097 participants, including 1,047 patients with cardiogenic heart failure. Across the nine included papers, the pooled sensitivity of LUS in the included studies was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97) with a maximum sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96 to 1.00) and a minimum of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.68). The pooled specificity of the included studies was 0.87 (95% CI: 0. 82, 0.91) with a maximum specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95) and a minimum of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.89). The pooled AUC was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84 to 0.97), suggesting a high diagnostic value of LUS in cardiogenic pulmonary edema. CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound offers a good diagnostic efficacy for cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Further standardization of the examination method is required to provide a reference for the clinical use of LUS.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Edema Pulmonar , Humanos , Edema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA