RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency are at high risk for severe and fatal toxicity from fluoropyrimidine (FP) chemotherapy. Pre-treatment DPYD testing is standard of care in many countries, but not the United States (US). This survey assessed pre-treatment DPYD testing approaches in the US to identify best practices for broader adoption. METHODS: From August to October 2023, a 22-item QualtricsXM survey was sent to institutions and clinicians known to conduct pre-treatment DPYD testing and broadly distributed through relevant organizations and social networks. Responses were analyzed using descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Responses from 24 unique US sites that have implemented pre-treatment DPYD testing or have a detailed implementation plan in place were analyzed. Only 33% of sites ordered DPYD testing for all FP-treated patients; at the remaining sites, patients were tested depending on disease characteristics or clinician preference. Almost 50% of sites depend on individual clinicians to remember to order testing without the assistance of electronic alerts or workflow reminders. DPYD testing was most often conducted by commercial laboratories that tested for at least the four or five DPYD variants considered clinically actionable. Approximately 90% of sites reported receiving results within 10 days of ordering. CONCLUSION: Implementing DPYD testing into routine clinical practice is feasible and requires a coordinated effort among the healthcare team. These results will be used to develop best practices for the clinical adoption of DPYD testing to prevent severe and fatal toxicity in cancer patients receiving FP chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Deficiencia de Dihidropirimidina Deshidrogenasa , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP) , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Dihidrouracilo Deshidrogenasa (NADP)/metabolismo , Deficiencia de Dihidropirimidina Deshidrogenasa/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Different dosing strategies exist to initiate warfarin, most commonly fixed warfarin dosing (FWD), clinical warfarin dosing (CWD), and genetic-guided warfarin dosing (GWD). Landmark trials have shown GWD to be superior when compared to FWD in the EU-PACT trial or CWD in the GIFT trial. COAG trial did not show differences between GWD and CWD. We aim to compare the anticoagulation quality outcomes of CWD and FWD. This is a prospective cohort study with a retrospective comparator. Recruited subjects in the CWD (prospective) arm were initiated on warfarin according to the clinical dosing component of the algorithm published in www.warfarindosing.org. The primary efficacy outcome was the percentage time in the therapeutic range (PTTR) from day 3 to 6 till day 28 to 35. The study enrolled 122 and 123 patients in the CWD and FWD, respectively. The PTTR did not differ statistically between CWD and FWD (62.2 ± 26.2% vs. 58 ± 25.4%, p = 0.2). There was also no difference between both arms in the percentage of visits with extreme subtherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) (<1.5; 15 ± 18.3% vs. 16.8 ± 19.1%, p = 0.44) or extreme supratherapeutic INR (>4; 7.7 ± 14.7% vs. 7.5 ± 12.4%, p = 0.92). We conclude that CWD did not improve the anticoagulation quality parameters compared to the FWD method.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Warfarina , Humanos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Algoritmos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Monitoreo de Drogas/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplant recipients relative to standard of care (SOC) tacrolimus dosing, from a US healthcare payer perspective. We developed decision-tree models to compare economic and clinical outcomes between CYP3A5 genotype-guided and SOC tacrolimus therapy in the first six months post-transplant. We derived inputs for CYP3A5 phenotype frequencies and physician use of genotype test results to inform clinical care from literature; tacrolimus exposure [high vs low tacrolimus time in therapeutic range using the Rosendaal algorithm (TAC TTR-Rosendaal)] and outcomes (incidences of acute tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, acute cellular rejection, and death) from real-world data; and costs from the Medicare Fee Schedule and literature. We calculated cost per avoided event and performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the results to changes in inputs. Incremental costs per avoided event for CYP3A5 genotype-guided vs SOC tacrolimus dosing were $176,667 for kidney recipients, $364,000 for liver recipients, $12,982 for heart recipients, and $93,333 for lung recipients. The likelihood of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing leading to cost-savings was 19.8% in kidney, 32.3% in liver, 51.8% in heart, and 54.1% in lung transplant recipients. Physician use of genotype results to guide clinical care and the proportion of patients with a high TAC TTR-Rosendaal were key parameters driving the cost-effectiveness of CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus therapy. Relative to SOC, CYP3A5 genotype-guided tacrolimus dosing resulted in a slightly greater benefit at a higher cost. Further economic evaluations examining intermediary outcomes (e.g., dose modifications) are needed, particularly in populations with higher frequencies of CYP3A5 expressers.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Genotipo , Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Órganos , Tacrolimus , Humanos , Tacrolimus/economía , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/genética , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Órganos/economía , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Rechazo de Injerto/economía , Estados Unidos , Análisis de Costo-EfectividadRESUMEN
CYP3A5 genetic variants are associated with tacrolimus metabolism. Controversy remains on whether CYP3A4 increased [*1B (rs2740574), *1 G (rs2242480)] and decreased function [*22 (rs35599367)] genetic variants provide additional information. This retrospective cohort study aims to address whether tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations differ between combined CYP3A (CYP3A5 and CYP3A4) phenotype groups. Heart transplanted patients (n = 177, between 2008 and 2020) were included and median age was 54 years old. Significant differences between CYP3A phenotype groups in tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations were found in the early postoperative period and continued to 6 months post-transplant. In CYP3A5 nonexpressers, carriers of CYP3A4*1B or *1 G variants (Group 3) compared to CYP3A4*1/*1 (Group 2) patients were found to have lower tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough concentrations at 2 months. In addition, significant differences were found among CYP3A phenotype groups in the dose at discharge and time to therapeutic range while time in therapeutic range was not significantly different. A combined CYP3A phenotype interpretation may provide more nuanced genotype-guided TAC dosing in heart transplant recipients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Tacrolimus , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/metabolismo , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Fenotipo , Genotipo , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
Precision medicine initiatives across the globe have led to a revolution of repositories linking large-scale genomic data with electronic health records, enabling genomic analyses across the entire phenome. Many of these initiatives focus solely on research insights, leading to limited direct benefit to patients. We describe the biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine (CCPM Biobank) that was jointly developed by the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and UCHealth to serve as a unique, dual-purpose research and clinical resource accelerating personalized medicine. This living resource currently has more than 200,000 participants with ongoing recruitment. We highlight the clinical, laboratory, regulatory, and HIPAA-compliant informatics infrastructure along with our stakeholder engagement, consent, recontact, and participant engagement strategies. We characterize aspects of genetic and geographic diversity unique to the Rocky Mountain region, the primary catchment area for CCPM Biobank participants. We leverage linked health and demographic information of the CCPM Biobank participant population to demonstrate the utility of the CCPM Biobank to replicate complex trait associations in the first 33,674 genotyped individuals across multiple disease domains. Finally, we describe our current efforts toward return of clinical genetic test results, including high-impact pathogenic variants and pharmacogenetic information, and our broader goals as the CCPM Biobank continues to grow. Bringing clinical and research interests together fosters unique clinical and translational questions that can be addressed from the large EHR-linked CCPM Biobank resource within a HIPAA- and CLIA-certified environment.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje del Sistema de Salud , Medicina de Precisión , Humanos , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas , Colorado , GenómicaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe our experiences implementing and iterating CYP2C19 genotype-guided clopidogrel pharmacogenetic clinical decision support (CDS) tools over time in the setting of a large health system-wide, preemptive pharmacogenomics program. SUMMARY: Clopidogrel-treated patients who are genetically predicted cytochrome P450 isozyme 2C19 (CYP2C19) intermediate or poor metabolizers have an increased risk of atherothrombotic events, some of which can be life-threatening. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium provides guidance for the use of clopidogrel based on CYP2C19 genotype in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Our multidisciplinary team implemented an automated, interruptive alert that fires when clopidogrel is ordered or refilled for biobank participants with structured CYP2C19 intermediate or poor metabolizer genomic indicators in the electronic health record. The implementation began with a narrow cardiovascular indication and setting and was then scaled in 4 primary dimensions: (1) clinical indication; (2) availability across health-system locations; (3) care venue (e.g., inpatient vs outpatient); and (4) provider groups (eg, cardiology and neurology). We iterated our approach over time based on evolving clinical evidence and proactive strategies to optimize CDS maintenance and sustainability. A key facilitator of expansion was socialization of the broader pharmacogenomics initiative among our academic medical center community, accompanied by clinician acceptance of pharmacogenetic alerts in practice. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary collaboration is recommended to facilitate the use of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Evolving clopidogrel pharmacogenetic evidence necessitates thoughtful iteration of implementation efforts and strategies to optimize long-term maintenance and sustainability.
Asunto(s)
Clopidogrel , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19 , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Farmacogenética , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Farmacogenética/métodos , Genotipo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Registros Electrónicos de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of exposure to pharmacogenomic medications is well established but little is known about how long patients are exposed to these medications. AIM: Our objective was to describe the amount of exposure to actionable pharmacogenomic medications using patient-level measures among a large nationally representative population using an insurance claims database. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study included adults (18+ years) from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics claims database with incident fills of 72 Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium level A, A/B, or B medications from January 2012 through September 2018. Patient-level outcomes included the proportion of days covered (PDC), number of fills, and average days supplied per fill over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Over 1 million fills of pharmacogenetic medications were identified for 605,355 unique patients. The mean PDC for all medications was 0.21 (SD 0.3), suggesting patients were exposed 21% (77 days) of the year. Medications with the highest PDC (0.55-0.89) included ivacaftor, tamoxifen, clopidogrel, HIV medications, transplant medications, and statins; with the exception of statins, these medications were initiated by fewer patients. Pharmacogenomic medications were filled an average of 2.8 times (SD 3.0, range 1-81) during the year following the medication's initiation, and the average days supplied for each fill was 22.3 days (SD 22.4, range 1-180 days). CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics associated with more medication exposure were male sex, older age, and comorbid chronic conditions. Prescription fill data provide patient-level exposure metrics that can further our understanding of pharmacogenomic medication utilization and help inform opportunities for pharmacogenomic testing.
RESUMEN
Although the use of genomics to inform clinical care is increasing, clinicians feel underprepared to integrate personalized medicine (PM) into care decisions. The educational needs of physician residents and fellows, also known as graduate medical trainees (GMTs), have been overlooked. We administered an anonymous, web-based survey to all GMTs participating in training programs affiliated with our institution to evaluate their knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward PM. Of the 1190 GMTs contacted, 319 (26.8%) returned surveys. Most (88.4%) respondents reported receiving PM education in the past. Although the respondents agreed that knowledge of disease genetics (80.9%) or pharmacogenetics (87.1%) would likely lead to improved clinical outcomes, only 33.2% of the respondents felt sufficiently informed about PM. The respondents who had received PM education in residency and/or fellowship had significantly higher self-reported knowledge, ability, awareness, and adoption of PM than those who had not received this education (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.01, respectively). Targeted training is needed to improve GMTs' confidence in interpreting and explaining genetic test results. The ideal timing for this education appears to be in residency and/or fellowship rather than in medical school.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the increased demand for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing to guide antidepressant use, little is known about how to implement testing in clinical practice. Best-worst scaling (BWS) is a stated preferences technique for determining the relative importance of alternative scenarios and is increasingly being used as a healthcare assessment tool, with potential applications in implementation research. We conducted a BWS experiment to evaluate the relative importance of implementation factors for PGx testing to guide antidepressant use. METHODS: We surveyed 17 healthcare organizations that either had implemented or were in the process of implementing PGx testing for antidepressants. The survey included a BWS experiment to evaluate the relative importance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs from the perspective of implementing sites. RESULTS: Participating sites varied on their PGx testing platform and methods for returning recommendations to providers and patients, but they were consistent in ranking several CFIR constructs as most important for implementation: patient needs/resources, leadership engagement, intervention knowledge/beliefs, evidence strength and quality, and identification of champions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using choice experiments to systematically evaluate the relative importance of implementation determinants from the perspective of implementing organizations. BWS findings can inform other organizations interested in implementing PGx testing for mental health. Further, this study demonstrates the application of BWS to PGx, the findings of which may be used by other organizations to inform implementation of PGx testing for mental health disorders.
RESUMEN
Actionable drug-gene pairs relevant to depression treatment include CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 with specific antidepressants. While clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing is growing, little is known about pharmacogenetic testing for depression treatment in managed care. We determined the incidence of single-gene CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 testing following a new depression episode among US managed care patients, and described characteristics and antidepressant use of patients receiving tests. We used paid medical and pharmacy claims for patients from commercial health plans in the US. For adult patients with a new depression episode from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2018, we identified covered claims for single-gene CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic tests and antidepressant fills. Fewer than 1% (n = 1795) of the depressed cohort (n = 438,534) received a single-gene CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 test through their insurance within 365 days of their earliest depression episode. The percentage of patients who received a test nearly tripled from 0.2% in 2013 to 0.5% in 2014 before plateauing at 0.4% from 2014 to 2017. Among the patients who received a single-gene CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 test and filled an antidepressant within 365 days of their depression diagnosis, up to 30% may have had their initial antidepressant informed by the test result. Our findings describe the use of antidepressants before and after pharmacogenetic testing, which is clinically relevant as pharmacogenomic testing becomes more common in clinical practice. Our study also emphasizes the need for procedure and billing codes that capture multiple-gene panel tests to be more widely implemented in administrative databases.
Asunto(s)
Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6 , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/genética , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/genética , Humanos , Programas Controlados de Atención en SaludRESUMEN
Aim: To assess the perspectives and experiences of patients who participated in a pharmacist-provided clinical pharmacogenomics (PGx) service. Methods: We conducted individual semistructured interviews with 16 patients who received a pharmacist-provided PGx service. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify pertinent themes. Results: The major themes identified were: heterogeneity of patient PGx experiences and preferences, pharmacists as appropriate providers of PGx services, considerations regarding the use of PGx results in routine healthcare and perceived applications of PGx testing. Theme-derived considerations included the need to establish appropriate pre-genotyping expectations, individualize patient education, facilitate collaboration with patients' providers and sustainably update patients' PGx information over time. Conclusion: Patient-specific perspectives such as these are important to consider when providing clinical PGx services, with intention of optimizing patient experiences.
Asunto(s)
Farmacéuticos , Farmacogenética , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Pruebas de FarmacogenómicaRESUMEN
There is growing interest in utilizing pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing to guide antidepressant use, but there is lack of clarity on how to implement testing into clinical practice. We administered two surveys at 17 sites that had implemented or were in the process of implementing PGx testing for antidepressants. Survey 1 collected data on the process and logistics of testing. Survey 2 asked sites to rank the importance of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs using best-worst scaling choice experiments. Of the 17 sites, 13 had implemented testing and four were in the planning stage. Thirteen offered testing in the outpatient setting, and nine in both outpatient/inpatient settings. PGx tests were mainly ordered by psychiatry (92%) and primary care (69%) providers. CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 were the most commonly tested genes. The justification for antidepressants selected for PGx guidance was based on Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines (94%) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; 75.6%) guidance. Both institutional (53%) and commercial laboratories (53%) were used for testing. Sites varied on the methods for returning results to providers and patients. Sites were consistent in ranking CFIR constructs and identified patient needs/resources, leadership engagement, intervention knowledge/beliefs, evidence strength and quality, and the identification of champions as most important for implementation. Sites deployed similar implementation strategies and measured similar outcomes. The process of implementing PGx testing to guide antidepressant therapy varied across sites, but key drivers for successful implementation were similar and may help guide other institutions interested in providing PGx-guided pharmacotherapy for antidepressant management.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Farmacogenética , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/genética , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Farmacogenética/métodosRESUMEN
In vivo studies suggest that arrhythmia risk may be greater with less selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, but evidence from population-based studies is missing. We aimed to compare saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin with regard to risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA)/ventricular arrhythmia (VA). We conducted high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) matched, new-user cohort studies. We analyzed Medicaid and Optum Clinformatics separately. We identified new users of saxagliptin, sitagliptin (both databases), and linagliptin (Optum only). We defined SCA/VA outcomes using emergency department and inpatient diagnoses. We identified and then controlled for confounders via a data-adaptive, hdPS approach. We generated marginal hazard ratios (HRs) via Cox proportional hazards regression using a robust variance estimator while adjusting for calendar year. We identified the following matched comparisons: saxagliptin vs. sitagliptin (23,895 vs. 96,972) in Medicaid, saxagliptin vs. sitagliptin (48,388 vs. 117,383) in Optum, and linagliptin vs. sitagliptin (36,820 vs. 78,701) in Optum. In Medicaid, use of saxagliptin (vs. sitagliptin) was associated with an increased rate of SCA/VA (adjusted HR (aHR), 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-3.25). However, in Optum data, this finding was not present (aHR, 0.79, 95% CI 0.41-1.51). Further, we found no association between linagliptin (vs. sitagliptin) and SCA/VA (aHR, 0.65, 95% CI 0.36-1.17). We found discordant results regarding the association between SCA/VA with saxagliptin compared with sitagliptin in two independent datasets. It remains unclear whether these findings are due to heterogeneity of treatment effect in the different populations, chance, or unmeasured confounding.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/inducido químicamente , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/efectos adversos , Adamantano/efectos adversos , Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Dipéptidos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Linagliptina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Fosfato de Sitagliptina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective was to assess the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms in mycophenolate and cytomegalovirus antiviral drug pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes and drug-induced leukopenia in adult heart transplant recipients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included n = 148 patients receiving mycophenolate and a cytomegalovirus antiviral drug. In total, 81 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 21 pharmacokinetic and 23 pharmacodynamic genes were selected for investigation. The primary and secondary outcomes were mycophenolate and/or cytomegalovirus antiviral drug-induced leukopenia, defined as a white blood cell count <3.0 × 109/L, in the first six and 12 months post-heart transplant, respectively. RESULTS: Mycophenolate and/or cytomegalovirus antiviral drug-induced leukopenia occurred in 20.3% of patients. HNF1A rs1169288 A>C (p.I27L) was associated with drug-induced leukopenia (unadjusted p = 0.002; false discovery rate <20%) in the first six months post-transplant. After adjusting for covariates, HNF1A rs1169288 variant C allele carriers had significantly higher odds of leukopenia compared to A/A homozygotes (odds ratio 6.19; 95% CI 1.97-19.43; p = 0.002). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in HNF1A, SLC13A1, and MBOAT1 were suggestively associated (p < 0.05) with the secondary outcome but were not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest genetic variation may play a role in the development of leukopenia in patients receiving mycophenolate and cytomegalovirus antiviral drugs after heart transplantation. Following replication, pharmacogenetic markers, such as HNF1A rs1169288, could help identify patients at higher risk of drug-induced leukopenia, allowing for more personalized immunosuppressant therapy and cytomegalovirus prophylaxis following heart transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/farmacocinética , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Trasplante de Corazón , Factor Nuclear 1-alfa del Hepatocito/genética , Leucopenia/inducido químicamente , Ácido Micofenólico/farmacocinética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Citomegalovirus , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Rechazo de Injerto/metabolismo , Factor Nuclear 1-alfa del Hepatocito/metabolismo , Humanos , Leucopenia/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The increased availability of clinical pharmacogenetic (PGx) guidelines and decreasing costs for genetic testing have slowly led to increased utilization of PGx testing in clinical practice. Pre-emptive PGx testing, where testing is performed in advance of drug prescribing, is one means to ensure results are available at the time of prescribing decisions. However, the most efficient and effective methods to clinically implement this strategy remain unclear. METHODS: In this report, we compare and contrast implementation strategies for pre-emptive PGx testing by 15 early-adopter institutions. We surveyed these groups, collecting data on testing approaches, team composition, and workflow dynamics, in addition to estimated third-party reimbursement rates. RESULTS: We found that while pre-emptive PGx testing models varied across sites, institutions shared several commonalities, including methods to identify patients eligible for testing, involvement of a precision medicine clinical team in program leadership, and the implementation of pharmacogenes with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines available. Finally, while reimbursement rate data were difficult to obtain, the data available suggested that reimbursement rates for pre-emptive PGx testing remain low. CONCLUSION: These findings should inform the establishment of future implementation efforts at institutions considering a pre-emptive PGx testing program.
Asunto(s)
Farmacogenética , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/métodosRESUMEN
Background: The goal of the study was to assess the relationship between single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes and renal dysfunction in adult heart transplant (HTx) recipients. Methods: This retrospective analysis included N = 192 patients receiving a CNI at 1-year post-HTx. Using a candidate gene approach, 93 SNVs in eight pharmacokinetic and 35 pharmacodynamic genes were chosen for investigation. The primary outcome was renal dysfunction 1-year after HTx, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 ml/min/1.73m2. Results: Renal dysfunction was present in 28.6% of patients 1-year after HTx. Two SNVs [transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) rs4803455 C > A and phospholipase C beta 1 (PLCB1) rs170549 G > A] were significantly associated with renal dysfunction after accounting for a false discovery rate (FDR) of 20%. In a multiple-SNV adjusted model, variant A allele carriers of TGFB1 rs4803455 had lower odds of renal dysfunction compared to C/C homozygotes [odds ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.62; p = 0.002], whereas PLCB1 rs170549 variant A allele carriers had higher odds of the primary outcome vs. patients with the G/G genotype (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.21-5.84, p = 0.015). Conclusion: Our data suggest that genetic variation in TGFB1 and PLCB1 may contribute to the occurrence of renal dysfunction in HTx recipients receiving CNIs. Pharmacogenetic markers, such as TGFB1 rs4803455 and PLCB1 rs170549, could help identify patients at increased risk of CNI-associated renal dysfunction following HTx, potentially allowing clinicians to provide more precise and personalized care to this population.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We describe the implementation of a pharmacist-provided pharmacogenomics (PGx) service in an executive health program (EHP) at an academic medical center. SUMMARY: As interest in genomic testing grows, pharmacists have the opportunity to advance the use of PGx in EHPs, in collaboration with other healthcare professionals. In November 2018, a pharmacist-provided PGx service was established in the EHP at the University of Colorado Hospital. The team members included 3 physicians, a pharmacist trained in PGx, a registered dietitian/exercise physiologist, a nurse, and 2 medical assistants. We conducted 4 preimplementation steps: (1) assessment of the patient population, (2) selection of a PGx test, (3) establishment of a visit structure, and (4) selection of a billing model. The PGx consultations involved two 1-hour visits. The first visit encompassed pretest PGx education, review of the patient's current medications and previous medication intolerances, and DNA sample collection for genotyping. After this visit, the pharmacist developed a therapeutic plan based on the PGx test results, discussed the results and plan with the physician, and created a personalized PGx report. At the second visit, the pharmacist reviewed the PGx test results, personalized the PGx report, and discussed the PGx-guided therapeutic plan with the patient. Overall, the strategy worked well; minor challenges included evaluation of gene-drug pairs with limited PGx evidence, communication of information to non-EHP providers, scheduling issues, and reimbursement. CONCLUSION: The addition of a PGx service within an EHP was feasible and provided pharmacists the opportunity to lead PGx efforts and collaborate with physicians to expand the precision medicine footprint at an academic medical center.
Asunto(s)
Farmacéuticos , Médicos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Farmacogenética , Medicina de PrecisiónRESUMEN
To compare etonogestrel pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes by both self-reported race/ethnicity and genetically determined ancestry among contraceptive implant users. We conducted a secondary analysis of our parent pharmacogenomic study of 350 implant users. We genotyped these reproductive-aged (18-45 years) women for 88 ancestry-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms. We then assigned each participant a proportion value for African (AFR), European (EUR), and Indigenous American (AMR) ancestry based on reference population data. We correlated genetic ancestry with self-reported race/ethnicity and utilized genetic ancestry proportion values as variables for previously performed association analyses with serum etonogestrel concentrations and progestin-related side effects (e.g., bothersome bleeding and subjective weight gain). We successfully estimated genetically determined ancestry for 332 participants. EUR, AFR, and AMR ancestry were each highly correlated with self-reported White/non-Hispanic race (r = 0.64, p = 4.14 × 10-40 ), Black/African American race (r = 0.88, p = 1.36 × 10-107 ), and Hispanic/Latina ethnicity (r = 0.68, p = 4.03 × 10-47 ), respectively. Neither genetically determined ancestry nor self-reported race/ethnicity were significantly associated with serum etonogestrel concentrations. AFR ancestry and self-reported Black race had similar associations with reporting monthly periods (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, p = 0.09 vs. OR 2.22, p = 0.02) and having received treatment for bothersome bleeding (OR 5.19, p = 0.005 vs. OR 4.73, p = 2.0 × 10-4 ). In multivariable logistic regression for subjective weight gain, AMR ancestry dropped out of the model in preference for self-reported Hispanic/Latina ethnicity. We found no new associations between genetically determined ancestry and contraceptive implant pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics. Self-reported race/ethnicity were strong surrogates for genetically determined ancestry among this population of contraceptive implant users. Our data suggest that self-reported race/ethnicity, capturing societal and cultural aspects, remain important to the investigation of progestin-related side effects.
Asunto(s)
Agentes Anticonceptivos Hormonales/farmacocinética , Desogestrel/efectos adversos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Población Negra/genética , Agentes Anticonceptivos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Agentes Anticonceptivos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Desogestrel/administración & dosificación , Desogestrel/farmacocinética , Implantes de Medicamentos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Indígenas Norteamericanos/genética , Variantes Farmacogenómicas , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Uterina/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Uterina/genética , Aumento de Peso/efectos de los fármacos , Aumento de Peso/genética , Población Blanca/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Aim: To assess providers' knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and experiences related to pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing in pediatric patients. Materials & methods: An electronic survey was sent to multidisciplinary healthcare providers at a pediatric hospital. Results: Of 261 respondents, 71.3% were slightly or not at all familiar with PGx, despite 50.2% reporting prior PGx education or training. Most providers, apart from psychiatry, perceived PGx to be at least moderately useful to inform clinical decisions. However, only 26.4% of providers had recent PGx testing experience. Unfamiliarity with PGx and uncertainty about the clinical value of testing were common perceived challenges. Conclusion: Low PGx familiarity among pediatric providers suggests additional education and electronic resources are needed for PGx examples in which data support testing in children.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/normas , Pediatría/normas , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud/economía , Humanos , Pediatría/economía , Farmacogenética/economía , Farmacogenética/tendencias , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica/economía , Medicina de Precisión/tendenciasRESUMEN
Bariatric surgery (BSg) is an effective treatment for morbid obesity, but little is known about the outcomes of BSg patients who undergo orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). The aim of this study was to determine if BSg alters calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) level variability after OHT. Data were collected from 58 consecutive patients who underwent OHT at a single center from 1/2018 to 4/2019: 4 with BSg prior to OHT (BSg + OHT) and 54 without prior BSg (OHT). CNI level, cardiac biopsy, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) data were collected during the first 6 months post-OHT. Comparisons were made for 3 measures of CNI variability: coefficient of variation, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and TTR by the Rosendaal method. A Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between CNI TTR, episodes of rejection, and LVEF. The results show TTR was lower in BSg + OHT compared to OHT (12.5% vs 31.3%, P < .05). For the entire cohort, greater TTR correlated with fewer episodes of rejection (r = 0.31, P < .05). In conclusion, these findings suggest BSg + OHT patients may warrant closer monitoring of CNI levels post-OHT. Furthermore, episodes of rejection and LVEF were similar for BSg + OHT patients, indicating that BSg should not be a contraindication to transplant.