The impact of body mass index on the progression-free survival of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Aim: Endocrine therapy (ET) plus cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors is a standard treatment for hormone receptor (HR) positive HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving ET plus CDK 4/6 inhibitors.Materials & methods: Patients with metastatic HR-positive breast cancer receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors were included in the study. A total of 116 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups according to BMI level: normal weight (group 1) 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, overweight (group 2) 25-29.9 kg/m2 and obese (group 3): ≥30 kg/m2. Median follow-up was 10.83 months. Comparisons of PFS and BMI categories were performed by Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test.Results: PFS was 9.3 (5.3-13.4) months in normal weight patients and 11.1 (9.7-12.56) months in obese patients and was not reached in overweight patients. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02).Conclusion: Low BMI has been shown to have a negative prognostic effect on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer and overweight patients had a longer PFS.

[Box: see text].

Drug induced lupus associated with Trastuzumab emtansine in a patient with metastatic breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is employed in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The most common side effects are fatigue, diarrhoea, anaemia, transaminase elevation and drug-induced thrombocytopenia. This report describes a patient with metastatic breast cancer who developed drug-induced lupus due to T-DM1. CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old woman was diagnosed with breast cancer in March 2018. She underwent modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (pT2N1aM0). Following supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in May 2018, she received 8 cycles of docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. In December 2020, the patient presented with axillary and intra-abdominal lymph node metastases, along with bone metastases observed on PET/CT scan. Treatment with T-DM1 and zoledronic acid was initiated. After 18 months on T-DM1, she developed drug-induced lupus. Her symptoms resolved with hydroxychloroquine treatment and discontinuation of T-DM1. DISCUSSION: Drug-induced lupus is a clinical syndrome that shares similar features with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The majority of patients present with symptoms such as arthralgia and myalgia. Hydralazine and procainamide are high-risk drugs for drug-induced lupus. Symptoms usually develop after months or years of use, but may also develop suddenly. Our patient also received TDM-1 treatment for 18 months. We present a case of TDM-1-associated drug-induced lupus in a patient with metastatic breast cancer. This is the first case of TDM-1-related drug-induced lupus reported in the literature.

Comparison of the efficacy of sunitinib and pazopanib in patients with advanced non-clear renal cell carcinoma.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease group, accounting for approximately 25% of all RCC cases. Due to its rarity and especially heterogeneity, phase III trial data is limited and treatment options generally follow those of clear cell RCC. In the literature, there exists a number of studies with sunitinib, cabozantinib, and everolimus, but data on the efficacy of pazopanib are limited. Our aim in this study was to compare the efficacy of pazopanib and sunitinib, in a multicenter retrospective cohort of non-ccRCC patients. Our study included patients diagnosed with non-ccRCC who received pazopanib or sunitinib treatment as first-line therapy from 22 tertiary hospitals. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rates of pazopanib and sunitinib treatments. Additionally, we investigated prognostic factors in non-ccRCC. PFS and response rates of sunitinib and pazopanib were found to be similar, while a numerical difference was observed in OS. Being 65 years and older, being in the intermediate or poor risk group according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, having liver metastases, presence of a sarcomatoid component, and having de novo metastatic disease were found to be significantly associated with shorter PFS. Pazopanib treatment appears to have similar efficacy in the treatment of non-ccRCC compared to sunitinib. Though randomized controlled trials are lacking and will probably be never be available, we suggest that pazopanib could be a preferred agent like sunitinib and cabozantinib.

Pazopanib and sunitinib treatments show similar progression free survival, overall survival and objective response rate.IMDC risk group, liver metastasis, sarcomatoid component and de novo metastatic disease were determined as prognostic factors.

Lorlatinib experience in a patient with ALK + non-small cell lung cancer on hemodialysis: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Lorlatinib is a potent third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase/c-ros oncogene 1 (ALK)/ROS1 oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has broad coverage of acquired resistance mutations and is currently indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are ALK-positive. CASE REPORT: In this case, we aimed to present the safety and effectiveness of lorlatinib use in a patient diagnosed with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC who underwent hemodialysis 3 days a week. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: A 76-year-old female patient has been undergoing regular hemodialysis for about 2 years. A brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was taken due to headache and a mass was detected. She was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma as a result of excisional biopsy. Positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT) showed a mass in the hilar region of the left lung and multiple lymphadenopathy in the mediastinum. In February 2023, 100 mg lorlatinib was started daily. There was no significant regression in PET-CT and no brain MRI residue during follow-up. The patient has been continuing lorlatinib for approximately 1 year with almost complete response, with no side effects other than hypercholesterolemia. DISCUSSION: We presented our experience using lorlatinib in a patient with metastatic ALK + NSCLC undergoing hemodialysis. Although the dosage of lorlatinib in hemodialysis patients is still controversial, our case report indicates that 100 mg lorlatinib was safe in this patient.

Comparison of granisetron and palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the efficacy of first-generation granisetron and second-generation palonosetron in triplet anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving cisplatin-based high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, observational study was conducted between June 2018 and December 2021. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who received triplet anti-emetic prophylactic treatment with aprepitant and dexamethasone plus granisetron or palonosetron before the first cycle of chemotherapy were included in the study. At the end of the first week after chemotherapy, the emesis scale was applied to the patients during the outpatient control. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) and total control (TC). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients were included in the study. Sixty-one patients were in the granisetron group and 60 patients were in the palonosetron group. CR was higher with granisetron in the acute phase (70.5% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.16; respectively) and higher with palonosetron in the delayed phase (61.7% vs. 55.7%, p = 0.5; respectively), although not statistically significant. The TC rates were also not significantly different between the groups (54.1% vs.57.6%, p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between granisetron and palonosetron in both acute and delayed control of emesis in NSCLC patients receiving cisplatin-based HEC.

Rare case of myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts 2 developing after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer in a patient with Bloom syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Bloom syndrome (BS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by a loss-of-function mutation in the BLM gene encoding an RecQ helicase involved in DNA repair and maintenance of chromosomal stability. In patients with BS, significant sensitivity to both DNA-damaging chemotherapy (CT) and ionizing radiation complicates the management of neoplasms by exacerbating comorbidities and predisposing to toxicities and poor outcomes. CASE REPORT: A 30-year-old female patient diagnosed with BS who presented with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer was treated with four cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) followed by weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) for 12 weeks as the chemotherapy protocol and a total of 5000 cGy curative radiotherapy (RT). Due to pancytopenia 8 months after completion of therapy, bone marrow biopsy and aspiration were performed, and a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts 2 (MDS-EB2) was made. Two courses of the azacitidine (75 mg/m2) protocol were administered every 28 days in the hematology clinic. Two weeks after CT the patient was transferred from the emergency department to the hematology clinic with the diagnosis of pancytopenia and febrile neutropenia. She died at the age of 33 due to sepsis that developed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Due to the rarity of BS, there is no prospective trial in patients with cancer and no evidence base upon which to design treatment programs. For these reasons, it is strongly recommended that patients receive multidisciplinary care, with precise assessment and discussion of the indication and an adequate dose of DNA-damaging agents such as chemotherapy and ionizing radiation.

Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with pertuzumab: Turkish oncology group multicenter study.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and taxane. We reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) positive metastatic breast cancer and received pertuzumab and then TDM-1 between January 2014 and January 2021 from twenty- five cancer centers. The Kaplan- Meier method estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety were evaluated. One hundred fifty-three patients were included,79.1% of the patients received TDM-1 in the second line, 90.8% had visceral metastasis, and 30.7% had central nervous system involvement. The PFS and OS of TDM-1 were evaluated according to the number of previous lines (on the 2nd line or more than two lines) metastatic sites (visceral and non-visceral) and the presence of central nervous metastasis. In TDM-1 therapy, PFS in second line therapy was ten months (95% CI: 7.7 - 12.2); this was statistically higher than later-line PFS, which was six months (95% CI: 3.3 to 8.6) (p = 0.004). The median OS time was 25 months (95% CI: 21.0 to 28.9) in patients treated with TDM-1 in the second line and 19 months (95% CI: 12.3 to 25.6) in patients who received later than the second line(p = 0.175). There were no significant differences in PFS time of patients with and without visceral and central nervous metastases. Our study showed that TDM-1 was also effective in patients using pertuzumab, contributes significantly to PFS when used in the second line compared to its use in the later line, and does not make any difference in OS.

Comparison of the second-line treatment efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with taxane-based triplet chemotherapy: a Turkish Oncology Group Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI and paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who were previously treated with first-line modified docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (mDCF), or 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel (FLOT). METHODS: Patients who received a triplet regimen in the first line setting and were treated with FOLFIRI or paclitaxel in the second-line treatment were included. RESULTS: The study included 198 patients, with 115 receiving FOLFIRI and 83 receiving paclitaxel. The median age was 58 (range = 24-69). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.4-5.5] months in the FOLFIRI arm, and 4.1 (95% CI = 3.3-4.6) months in the paclitaxel arm (p = .007). The median overall survival (mOS) was 9.4 (95% CI = 7.4-10.5) months in the FOLFIRI arm and 7.2 (95% CI = 5.6-8.3) months in the paclitaxel arm (p = .008). Grade 3-4 neuropathy was higher in patients receiving paclitaxel compared to those receiving FOLFIRI (p = .04). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was 8% in the FOLFIRI arm and 2.4% in the paclitaxel arm (p = .02). CONCLUSION: Beyond progression with docetaxel-based triplet chemotherapy, FOLFIRI may be preferred as a second-line treatment over paclitaxel due to its longer mPFS and mOS.

Efficacy of Systemic Treatments in Patients With Metastatic Lung Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a rare histological subtype of lung invasive adenocarcinoma with unique clinical, radiological, histopathological, and genomic characteristics. There have been limited studies on the effectiveness of systemic therapy for lung IMA, with conflicting results reported. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the medical records of patients diagnosed with lung IMA. Patients who were ≥ 18 years of age and received at least 1 course of treatment for metastatic or locally advanced inoperable disease were included in the study. Archive records of 113 patients diagnosed with IMA were screened for the study. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients with lung IMA were included. The targetable mutation rate was 20.6% (in 6 of 29 patients). Most patients (83.1%) had received platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 25.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.02-11.2) and 17.5 months (95% CI, 11.7-23.3 months), respectively, in the patients who received chemotherapy. The median PFS and ORR were 20.6 (95% CI, 18.9-66.5) and 66.6%, respectively, in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients (n = 3) with relevant targeted therapy. Only 1 patient used oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination (XELOX) as chemotherapy in the second-line treatment and achieved a partial response (PR) at 7.2 months. CONCLUSION: Platinum-based chemotherapies moderately enhance IMA patients' survival rates. Anti-EGFR-targeted drugs are seen as potentially effective in patients with EGFR driver mutation positive. Large, prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

The effect of concomitant beta-blocker use on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors in the first line.

PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is one of the cornerstones of treatment in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Since RCC is a disease of advanced age and hypertension as a side effect of VEGF receptor inhibitors, beta-blocker use is common in these patients. We aimed to compare the treatment efficacy and survival results in case of concomitant use of these two drugs due to the inhibition of VEGF in beta-blockers. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with a diagnosis of mRCC who used sunitinib or pazopanib in first-line therapy were included in the study. These patients were divided into two groups as those using concomitant beta-blockers and those not using them. RESULT: The median overall survival (mOS) of the patient using sunitinib or pazopanib and concomitant beta-blocker was 47 (95% CI 29.0-65.0) months, and the mOS of those not using concomitant beta-blocker was 18 (95% CI 8.9-27.1) months (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the patients using sunitinib or pazopanib and concomitant beta-blocker was 20.4 (95% CI 4.5-40.1) months, and the mPFS of those not using it was 11.4 (95% CI 5.9-16.9) months (p = 0.042). Concomitant beta-blocker use was found to be a good prognostic factor for OS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.029). In the multivariate analysis, concomitant beta-blocker use had a trend towards statistical significance for PFS (p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of betablockers with sunitinib or pazopanib is associated with longer overall survial and progression free survival.

The correlation between pre-treatment CEA levels and the EGFR mutation status in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, especially in adenocarcinoma, has led to a major change in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the relationship between the EGFR mutation status and the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels at the time of diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients with EGFR mutation and tested CEA levels were recruited for this study. Of the patients, 24 were EGFR mutants (23.5%), while 78 patients (76.5%) did not harbor any EGFR mutations. RESULTS: The CEA levels did not differ across groups. Additionally, the CEA levels were analyzed between female and male patients separately due to EGFR mutations; no difference was observed. When the CEA levels were categorized as positive or negative based on different cut-off values, such as 5 and 10 ng/ml, no statistical difference was found between groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, no relationship between EGFR mutation and pre-treatment CEA levels was observed. Despite positive trials having shown a predictive value of CEA levels for EGFR mutation, more clinical trials are needed to elucidate the racial, clinical, and pathological differences of the study populations. Most studies have been located in the Far East, but new trials in Caucasian, African, and Hispanic populations are still lacking.

PROPSEA, safety evaluation of palbociclib and ribociclib in older patients with breast cancer: A prospective real-world TOG study.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, the toxicities and management of palbociclib and ribociclib in older patients (≥65 years) with metastatic breast cancer patients were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among older patients receiving palbociclib and ribociclib, Geriatric 8 (G8) and Groningen Frailty Index were used to evaluate frailty status. Dose modifications, drug withdrawal and other serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded and analyzed according to baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients from 28 centers in Turkey were included (palbociclib = 76, ribociclib = 84). Forty-three patients were ≥ 75 years of age. The most common cause of first dose modification was neutropenia for both drugs (97% palbociclib, 69% ribociclib). Liver function tests elevation (10%) and renal function impairment (6%) were also causes for ribociclib dose modification. Drug withdrawal rate was 3.9% for palbociclib and 6% for ribociclib. SAEs were seen in 11.8% of those taking palbociclib and 15.5% of those on riboclib. An ECOG performance status of ≥2 and being older than 75 years were associated with dose reductions. Severe neutropenia was more common in patients with non-bone-only metastatic disease, those receiving treatment third-line therapy or higher, coexistance of non-neutropenic hematological side effects (for ribociclib). Neutropenia was less common among patients with obesity. DISCUSSION: Our results show that it can be reasonable to start palbociclib and ribociclib at reduced dose in patients aged ≥75 years and/or with an ECOG performance status ≥2.

Is the Prognostic Nutritional Index a Prognostic Marker for the Survival of Patients with Lymph-Node Positive Stage II-III Gastric Cancer Who Receive Adjuvant Chemotherapy?

PURPOSE: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), like other systemic inflammatory markers, has been shown to be a prognostic factor in various cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to show whether PNI calculated before adjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with lymph node-positive stage II-III gastric cancer. METHODS: The PNI was calculated using the albumin and lymphocyte count. The PNI cut-off value was found to be 39.5. They were divided into two groups as being ≤ 39.5 (PNI low group) and > 39.5 (PNI high group). RESULTS: Our study included 168 patients with lymph node-positive stage II-III gastric cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Of the patients, 116 (69.0%) were 65 years or younger, and 52 (31.0%) were over 65 years old. Of the patients, 117 (69.6%) were pT3, 51 (30.4%) were pT4. Seventy-three (43.4%) patients had pN1-2 disease and 95 (56.6%) patients had pN3 disease. The number of stage II patients was 73 (43.5%) and the number of stage III patients was 95 (56.5%). There were 73 patients with PNI ≤ 39.5 and 95 patients with PNI > 39.5. The mOS of the patients with low PNI group was 39.5 months, while the OS of the patients with high PNI group was 96.8 months (p = 0.002). In the group of patients with PNI low group, mDFS 24.4 months was significantly higher than those with PNI high group was 50.7 months (p = 0.021). The PNI score was statistically significant in univariate and multivariate analyzes for both DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: PNI can be used as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS in patients lymph node-positive, stage II-III gastric cancer who will receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

Low-dose (7.5 mg/kg) bevacizumab may be a viable option in recurrent ovarian cancer: A retrospective study.

Objective: Bevacizumab (BEV) is a humanized monoclonal antibody of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and, as a result of clinical trials, was approved for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of BEV in patients with ROC in real-world practice beyond clinical trials. Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the medical data of all patients with ROC who were treated with BEV between October 2013 and March 2020. Results: A total of 76 females were evaluated. Forty-nine (64.5%) patients were platinum sensitive and 27 (35.5%) patients were platinum resistant. BEV was used in combination with chemotherapy agents in all patients, and the most preferred combinations were gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) (78.9%) and carboplatin/paclitaxel (14.5%). In all patients, the BEV dose was 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.6-12.6), and the median overall survival (OS) was 22.3 months (95% CI: 17.5-27.2). In multivariate analysis, serous histological type (P = 0.01), maintenance BEV administration (P = 0.001), and combination of GC-BEV (P < 0.001) were associated with better PFS, while serous histological type (P = 0.016) and good performance status (P = 0.006) were associated with prolonged OS. Conclusions: Low-dose (7.5 mg/kg) BEV was found to be effective in the second-line treatment of patients with ROC in our real-life study. In addition, the combination of BEV with GC was shown to be a viable option, especially in the treatment selection of platinum-resistant patients.

Sunitinib-induced small bowel wall edema as a prognostic marker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of small bowel wall edema (SBWE) on computed tomography (CT) images in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib and to investigate the relationship between the presence of SBWE and survival. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the presence of SBWE on CT images of 27 mRCC patients who received at least one cycle of sunitinib. Then, we analyzed the relationship between the presence of SBWE and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: All 27 patients had SBWE on at least one CT scan. The median value of SBWE thickness was 2.5 mm. SBWE thickness was ≤2.5 mm in 13 patients (group A) and >2.5 mm in 14 patients (group B). The median OS was significantly higher in group B (55 vs. 18 months, respectively, P = 0.02). Although it was not statistically significant (13 vs. 8 months, respectively, P = 0.69), the median PFS was longer in group B than in group A. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that sunitinib treatment caused SBWE in all patients with mRCC who received the drug. Also, this study demonstrated an association between higher SBWE thickness and better survival outcomes.

The Effect of RAS/BRAF Mutation Status on Prognosis and Relapse Pattern in Early Stage Colon Cancers.

PURPOSE: It is known that the RAS and BRAF mutations are predictive for targeted therapies in treating metastatic colon cancer and negatively affect the prognosis of the disease. However, there are limited studies in early-stage colon cancer about the relationship of this mutational condition with the prognosis and relapse pattern of the disease. In this study, we evaluated the effects of mutational status on the clinical pattern of recurrence and survival in early-stage colon cancer in addition to classical risk factors. METHODS: Patients with early-stage colon cancer at the first time of diagnosis and developing recurrence or metastasis on following up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the at the time of relapse RAS/BRAF mutation status: mutant or non-mutant/wild types. Then, mutation analysis was performed again from the early-stage tissue of the patients if available. The relationship between early-stage mutation status and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse pattern was analyzed. RESULTS: The number of patients with mutant and non-mutations in the early stage was 39 and 40, respectively. Mutant and non-mutant patients with stage 3 disease were similar (69% and 70%, respectively). OS (47.27 months vs. 67.53 months; p = 0.02) and PFS (25.12 vs. 38.13 months; p = 0.049) were statistically significantly lower in mutant patients, respectively. Most patients had distant metastases on both sides at recurrence (61.5% vs. 62.5%, respectively). There was no significant difference between mutant and non-mutant patients regarding distant metastasis and local recurrence rates (p = 0.657). A discordance of 11.4% between early-stage and late-stage tissue mutation status. CONCLUSION: The presence of mutation in early-stage colon cancer is associated with shorter OS and PFS. The mutational status did not have a significant effect on the recurrence pattern. Because of the discordance of early-stage and late-stage mutational status, it is recommended to perform mutation analysis from tissue at relapse.

The effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitor use on survival outcomes of Nivolumab-treated renal cell carcinoma patients: a multicenter study.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate the effect of concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use with nivolumab on survival outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in second-line setting. METHODS: The study was designed as a multicenter and retrospective involving patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line nivolumab therapy. One hundred and nine patients with mRCC were divided into two groups based on whether they use PPI concomitantly with nivolumab: concomitant PPI users and non-users. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the groups with and without concurrent PPIs. RESULTS: Of 109 patients in our study, 59 were not using PPI concomitantly with nivolumab and 50 were using PPI concomitantly. The median PFS was 6.37 (5.2-7.5) months in the concomitant PPI group and 9.7 (4.5-15) months in the non-users (p = 0.03). The median OS was 14.6 (7.1-22.1) months in patients on PPI concurrently with nivolumab and 29.9 (17.1-42.7) months in the non-users (p = 0.01). Accordingly, PPI use for PFS (Non-use vs. Use = HR: 0.44, 95%Cl 0.28-0.96, p = 0.014) and PPI use for OS (Non-use vs. Use = HR: 0.68, 95%Cl 0.22-0.88, p = 0.01) were found to be as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of PPIs is associated with worse survival outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab. Clinicians should carefully consider the concomitant use of PPIs in such patients.

Does red blood cell distribution width predict prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients using first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy?

Aim: It is red cell distribution width (RDW) that has been reported to show an inflammatory response which has been studied recently. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the pre-treatment RDW in patients using first-line vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR TKI) with the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) predicts treatment response and is a prognostic factor or not. Methods: About 92 patients diagnosed with mRCC who were being treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line between January 2015 and June 2021 were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, as being ≤15.3 and >15.3, according to the RDW cut-off value calculated by ROC analysis. Results: The mOS of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3% was 45.0 (30.0-59.9) months, and of 21.3 (10.4-32.2) in those with a RDW of >15.3%. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the group of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3, median progression free survival (mPFS) (38.04 [16.3-59.7] months) was found to be significantly higher than those with a RDW of >15.3 (17.1 [11.8-22.5] months) (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, RDW level (≤15.3, >15.3), was determined to be prognostic markers (p = 0.022). Conclusion: In mRCC patients, the RDW value measured before first-line VEGFR TKI therapy is an independent prognostic marker.

Prognostic biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer: delta prognostic nutritional index, delta neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and delta platelet to lymphocyte ratio.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and their dynamic changes on survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). METHODS: The data of 199 patients with mCRC were retrospectively analyzed. To evaluate the temporal relation between the PNI, NLR, and PLR values and survival, pre-chemotherapy PNI, NLR, and PLR levels were assessed from peripheral blood cell counts on admission; post-chemotherapy PNI, NLR, and PLR levels were assessed with follow-up blood cell counts within two weeks after chemotherapy; and the difference between pre-chemotherapy PNI, NLR, and PLR levels and post-chemotherapy PNI, NLR, and PLR levels was evaluated as delta PNI, delta NLR, and delta PLR. RESULTS: The median PNI, PLR, and NLR were 39.01, 150.2 and 2.53 before chemotherapy and 38.2, 146.6, and 3.31 after chemotherapy, respectively. The median OS was 23.7 months (95%CI:17.8-29.7) and 28.9 months (95%CI:24.8-33.08) for pre-chemotherapy PNI level < 39.01 vs. PNI level ≥ 39.01, respectively(p = 0.035) The positive delta PNI was significantly higher for OS than the negative delta PNI(p < 0.009). Delta PLR and delta NLR were not significant for OS and PFS(p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study clearly show that the negative delta PNI to be an independent predictor of poor OS and poor PFS in patients with colon cancer who received first line treatment. In addition, delta NLR and delta PLR were shown not to predict survival outcomes.