The association between fluconazole dose and MIC with mortality and persistence in candidemia.

To evaluate the association between fluconazole exposure parameters and clinical outcomes in patients with candidemia. We retrospectively included all adults with candidemia in a single center from January 2009 to December 2017, treated initially with fluconazole for fluconazole-susceptible candidemia. We assessed the association between fluconazole exposure parameters and 30-day mortality or 14-day clinical failure, a composite of mortality at day 14 or persistent candidemia ≥ 72 h, in all patients and in patients with C. glabrata candidemia. During the study period, 158 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Main species were C. albicans 66 (41.8%), C. glabrata 35 (22.2%), and C. parapsilosis 31 (19.6%). Sixty patients (38%) died within 30 days. Sixty-one patients (38.6%) experienced 14-day failure. In 30-day survivors, the median AUC24/MIC was 2279 [398, 5989] versus 1764 [238, 6714] h in non-survivors, p = 0.75. Median fluconazole MIC was 0.75 [0.25, 4] and 1 [0.22, 5.50] mg/L, p = 0.54, respectively. Similar non-significant differences were found for other fluconazole exposure parameters and in the 14-day clinical failure analysis. For C. glabrata, a higher AUC24/MIC was observed among 30-day survivors with a median of 230 [77, 539] compared to 96 [75, 164] h in non-survivors, p = 0.008, in parallel with a trend for lower MIC values (median 7 [1, 2] versus 16 [8, 24] mg/L, p = 0.06, respectively). Currently used fluconazole dosing has no association with clinical outcome in Candida with low MIC values. For Candida species with high MICs, attention to dosing is needed.

Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidemia Focusing on Prior Antifungal and Immunosuppressive Therapy.

BACKGROUND: With the widespread use of antifungal agents, the frequency of non-albicans Candida (NAC) blood-stream infections (BSI) is increasing. OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and risk factors for NAC BSI, focusing on prior antifungal and immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: The authors conducted an observational, retrospective cohort study among adult patients with candidemia at the Rambam Health Care Campus, a tertiary medical center in Israel, between 2009 and 2015. Comparisons between patients with Candidemia albicans and NAC candidemia were performed. Regression analysis, with NAC BSI as the dependent variable and significant risk factors for NAC as independent variables, was performed. RESULTS: A total of 308 episodes of candidemia were included. C. albicans was isolated in 30.8% of patients (95/308), while NAC spp. were isolated in the rest. Significant independent risk factors for NAC included immunosuppression therapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.38, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.19-0.76) and previous azole use (OR 0.2, 95%CI 0.06-0.710). The interaction between prior azole and immunosuppression therapy in the model was not significant, and after its inclusion in the model only immunosuppression remained significantly associated with NAC. In the subgroup of patients who did not receive prior azoles, immunosuppression therapy, neutropenia, and bone marrow transplantation were significantly associated with NAC. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of previous azole treatment, immunosuppressive therapy was a significant risk factor for NAC in our cohort.