Evaluation of online chat-based artificial intelligence responses about inflammatory bowel disease and diet.

INTRODUCTION: The USA has the highest age-standardized prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Both genetic and environmental factors have been implicated in IBD flares and multiple strategies are centered around avoiding dietary triggers to maintain remission. Chat-based artificial intelligence (CB-AI) has shown great potential in enhancing patient education in medicine. We evaluate the role of CB-AI in patient education on dietary management of IBD. METHODS: Six questions evaluating important concepts about the dietary management of IBD which then were posed to three CB-AI models - ChatGPT, BingChat, and YouChat three different times. All responses were graded for appropriateness and reliability by two physicians using dietary information from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation. The responses were graded as reliably appropriate, reliably inappropriate, and unreliable. The expert assessment of the reviewing physicians was validated by the joint probability of agreement for two raters. RESULTS: ChatGPT provided reliably appropriate responses to questions on dietary management of IBD more often than BingChat and YouChat. There were two questions that more than one CB-AI provided unreliable responses to. Each CB-AI provided examples within their responses, but the examples were not always appropriate. Whether the response was appropriate or not, CB-AIs mentioned consulting with an expert in the field. The inter-rater reliability was 88.9%. DISCUSSION: CB-AIs have the potential to improve patient education and outcomes but studies evaluating their appropriateness for various health conditions are sparse. Our study showed that CB-AIs have the ability to provide appropriate answers to most questions regarding the dietary management of IBD.

Influence of Political Ideology on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Political ideologies have emerged as one of the risk factors driving healthcare decisions, including colorectal cancer screening in US adults. Previous links between conservative viewpoints and lower awareness of preventive health services have been established. We aimed to evaluate how differences in political ideology affect CRC screening practices using a nationally representative sample of US adults. METHODS: Using data from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), we compared compliance with CRC screening guidelines between conservative, moderate, and liberal political groups. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models were employed to ascertain the relationship between political ideology and CRC screening. RESULTS: Of the 3368 respondents, 71.0% (95% CI: 67.8, 74.0) were screened for CRC. A total of 1026 (30.5%) were liberal, 1148 (34.1%) were moderate, and 1194 (35.4%) were conservative. Out of the conservatives (78.8%) were non-Hispanic Whites compared to moderates (61.4%) and liberals (64.0%). There was no significant difference in age, level of education, or income group by political ideology. In adjusted models, there was no significant difference in CRC screening by political ideology. CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous ties, we found no significant differences in compliance with CRC screening guidelines among these groups, concluding that CRC screening remains a significant health concern for all individuals, irrespective of political ideologies.

Impact of Primary Care Providers and Health Insurance Type on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer deaths. We evaluated the effect of health insurance type and primary care provider (PCP) access on CRC screening. METHODS: HINTS data were used to analyze CRC screening. RESULTS: Individuals aged 50 to 65 years had comparable screening rates across all insurance types. Beyond 65 years, individuals with Medicare or Medicare with private insurance were more likely to undergo screening than private insurance users. PCP access increased CRC screening rates. Among PCP users, Medicare, income, and smoking status influenced screening. DISCUSSION: Medicare and PCP access influence CRC screening. All individuals should be linked with PCPs.

Social media use and health promotion among cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Social media is becoming recognized as an effective platform for cancer health promotion, education, care, and support. However, its utility as a health promotion tool remains relatively unexplored. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey, we evaluated health-related usage of social media among cancer survivors and individuals without a history of cancer. We also examined the participant characteristics associated with social media usage and evaluated the relationship between social media use and positive health behaviors among the cancer survivors. RESULTS: Overall, cancer survivors (n = 2579) were as likely as individuals without a history of cancer to use social media for health promotion. Males [OR 0.65; 95% CI (0.45, 0.93)] and older adults (>60 years old) [OR 0.27; 95% CI(0.10, 0.77)] were less likely to use social media, while higher income [OR 2.27; 95% CI (1.05, 4.92) middle income; OR 1.90; 95% CI (1.17, 3.09) high income] and educational levels [OR 3.29; 95% CI (1.85, 5.84) some college; OR 2.36; 95% CI (1.30, 4.28) college graduate or more] were associated with more health-related social media use among survivors. Cancer survivors used social media for online support groups more than other individuals, and those who used at least one form of social media for health-related purposes increasingly meet national recommendations for strength training compared to non-users [OR 2.15; 95% CI (1.48, 3.13)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the potential utility of social media to promote positive health behaviors among cancer survivors. Further research is needed to describe the efficacy of social media-based interventions for improving health behaviors in diverse cancer populations.

Applicability of Online Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence Models to Colorectal Cancer Screening.

BACKGROUND: Over the past year, studies have shown potential in the applicability of ChatGPT in various medical specialties including cardiology and oncology. However, the application of ChatGPT and other online chat-based AI models to patient education and patient-physician communication on colorectal cancer screening has not been critically evaluated which is what we aimed to do in this study. METHODS: We posed 15 questions on important colorectal cancer screening concepts and 5 common questions asked by patients to the 3 most commonly used freely available artificial intelligence (AI) models. The responses provided by the AI models were graded for appropriateness and reliability using American College of Gastroenterology guidelines. The responses to each question provided by an AI model were graded as reliably appropriate (RA), reliably inappropriate (RI) and unreliable. Grader assessments were validated by the joint probability of agreement for two raters. RESULTS: ChatGPT and YouChat™ provided RA responses to the questions posed more often than BingChat. There were two questions that > 1 AI model provided unreliable responses to. ChatGPT did not provide references. BingChat misinterpreted some of the information it referenced. The age of CRC screening provided by YouChat™ was not consistently up-to-date. Inter-rater reliability for 2 raters was 89.2%. CONCLUSION: Most responses provided by AI models on CRC screening were appropriate. Some limitations exist in their ability to correctly interpret medical literature and provide updated information in answering queries. Patients should consult their physicians for context on the recommendations made by these AI models.

Primary Care Telehealth Visits and Its Association with Provider Discussion on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.

Background: Provider discussions about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are the single most important predictor for CRC screening uptake. Methods: Using cross-sectional data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey, we evaluated the relationship between telehealth use and provider discussion about CRC screening with a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: Of adults aged 45-75 years, 20.3% used telehealth services in the past year of which 69.5% had discussed CRC screening with their providers. There was no difference in provider discussion about CRC screening between telehealth users and nonusers (OR 1.26; 95% confidence interval 0.83-1.90). Conclusion: Telehealth is an important adjunct in health care delivery, enhancing patient-provider discussions about CRC screening.

The Role of Health Information Technology on Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation Among Smokers In The United States.

Background: Despite advances in its prevention and early detection, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and smokers are at an increased risk. Health information technology (HIT) has shown promise in the uptake of preventive health services, including CRC, and may prove useful among smokers. Methods: We obtained data from 7,419 adults who completed the 2018-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined the relationship between HIT use and CRC screening participation. Results: Over 20% of current smokers had no access to HIT tools, and those with access were less likely than never smokers to use HIT in checking test results (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.42-0.80]). Among former smokers, using HIT to check test results (OR 3.41; 95% CI [1.86-6.25]), look up health information online (OR 2.20; 95% CI [1.15-4.22]), and make health appointments (OR 2.86; 95% CI [1.39-5.89]) was associated with increased participation in CRC screening. Among current smokers, the use of HIT was not associated with a change in CRC screening participation. Conclusion: HIT use is associated with higher levels of CRC screening among former smokers, which is reassuring given their increased risk of CRC. The low ownership and use of HIT among current smokers of CRC screening age presents a challenge that may limit the integration of HIT into routine CRC screening services.

Prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States: evidence from the HINTS database 2018 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and CRC-related mortality among young adults (< 50 years) has been on the rise. The American Cancer Society (ACS) reduced the CRC screening age to 45 in 2018. Few studies have examined the barriers to CRC screening among young adults. METHODS: Analyses were conducted using data from 7,505 adults aged 45-75 years who completed the 2018 to 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. We examined the sociodemographic characteristics associated with CRC screening overall and by age group using separate multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: 76% of eligible adults had received screening for CRC. Increasing age, Black racial group [OR 1.45; 95% CI (1.07, 1.97)], having some college experience, a college degree or higher [OR 1.69; 95% CI (1.24, 2.29)], health insurance coverage [OR 4.48; 95% CI (2.96, 6.76)], primary care provider access [OR 2.48; 95% CI (1.91, 3.22)] and presence of a comorbid illness [OR 1.39; 95% CI (1.12, 1.73)] were independent predictors of CRC screening. Current smokers were less likely to undergo CRC screening [OR 0.59; 95% CI (0.40, 0.87)]. Among adults aged 50-64 years, being of Hispanic origin [OR 0.60; 95% CI (0.39, 0.92)] was associated with a lower likelihood of CRC screening. CONCLUSION: CRC screening rates among adults 45-49 years are low but are increasing steadily. Odds of CRC screening among Blacks is high which is encouraging while the odds among current smokers is low and concerning given their increased risk of developing CRC.

Awareness of the causal association between human papillomavirus and anal cancer among US adults.

PURPOSE: The incidence of anal cancer is on the rise in the US, especially among high-risk groups. This study examined the prevalence and determinants of awareness of the causal relationship between HPV and anal cancer among US adults. METHODS: Study data was obtained from the 2017 to 2020 iterations of the Health Information National Trends Survey. The prevalence of awareness that HPV causes anal cancer was estimated among HINTS respondents who were aware of HPV in general. Survey weights were used to provide estimates representative of the adult US population. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between awareness that HPV causes anal cancer and cancer-related behaviors/perceptions and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. RESULTS: Two thousand six hundred and eighty four (27.2%) of the study population were aware that HPV caused anal cancer. Those of gay sexual orientation were more aware than heterosexuals [OR 2.27; 95% CI (1.24, 4.14)]. Compared to respondents with a high school diploma or less, individuals with some college education [OR 1.38; 95% CI (1.03, 1.85)] and those with at least a college degree [OR 1.52; 95% CI (1.17, 1.98)] were more likely to be aware. Participants who had positive cancer information seeking behavior were more aware of the HPV-anal cancer link compared to those who did not [OR 1.57; 95% CI (1.30, 1.89)]. CONCLUSION: Population-level awareness that HPV causes anal cancer remains critically low in the US. Sexual orientation, level of education and cancer information seeking behavior are associated with increased awareness of the causal relationship between HPV and anal cancer. Efforts should be directed toward addressing the awareness gap among individuals with lower education levels and promoting curiosity-driven information seeking behaviors.

Trends in non-operative management of low-energy pelvic fracture: An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Introduction: Non-operative management is common for low-impact pelvic fractures. In this study, we characterize the epidemiology of those treated nonoperatively following low-energy pelvic fracture, while identifying recent management trends. Methodology: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2011 to 2018 were analyzed. We identified adult patients diagnosed with pelvic fracture based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, excluding fractures of the acetabulum, femur, polytrauma, and open fractures to isolate cases caused by low-impact mechanisms. Codes indicating operative management were excluded. Demographic information and outcomes (length of stay, in-hospital mortality, hospital discharge status) were collected. Sub-analyses were performed to identify trends. Findings: 123,936 eligible patients were identified. The average age was 68.7 years. 70% were female, showing a decline from 75% to 66% over the study period. Pubic bone involvement was observed in 59% of fractures. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 3.83, corresponding to a 10-year survival rate of 58.5%, which remained relatively stable throughout the study period. 62.4% of patients received treatment at urban teaching hospitals. Average length of hospital stay was 6.3 days. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) was the most common outcome, ranging from 62.1% to 65.0% during the study period, while 20.0% of patients were discharged home (18.4%-21.1%). Mean in-hospital mortality was 3.28%, showing no significant change, with higher rates among male patients (5.1%) and patients of Asian descent (3.8%). Conclusion: The majority of patients receiving nonoperative treatment for low-energy pelvic fractures were females in their mid-60s with moderate comorbidity. The study reveals a relatively high in-hospital mortality rate of 3.28%, particularly among male patients and those of Asian descent, indicating the need for increased surveillance for further injury in these groups. Most patients were discharged to a SNF, highlighting the necessity for extended rehabilitation in this population. This persistent trend is noteworthy considering the growing emphasis on the cost of inpatient admissions and advancements in outpatient management of orthopedic injuries.

Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Decision-making with regard to the treatment of humeral shaft fractures remains under debate. The cost-effectiveness of these treatment options has yet to be established. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of operative treatment with that of nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: We developed a decision tree for treatment options. Surgical costs included the ambulatory surgical fee, physician fee, anesthesia fee, and, in the sensitivity analysis, lost wages during recovery. We used the Current Procedural Terminology codes from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery to determine physician fees via the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database. The anesthesia fee was obtained from the national conversion factor and mean operative time for included procedures. We obtained data on mean wages from the U.S. Bureau of Labor and data on weeks missed from a similar study. We reported functional data via the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores obtained from existing literature. We used rollback analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to determine the cost-effectiveness of each treatment option, presented in dollars per meaningful change in DASH score, utilizing a $50,000 willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. RESULTS: The cost per meaningful change in DASH score for operative treatment was $18,857.97 at the 6-month follow-up and $25,756.36 at the 1-year follow-up, by Monte Carlo simulation. Wage loss-inclusive models revealed values that fall even farther below the WTP threshold, making operative management the more cost-effective treatment option compared with nonoperative treatment in both settings. With an upward variation of the nonoperative union rate to 84.17% in the wage-exclusive model and 89.43% in the wage-inclusive model, nonoperative treatment instead became more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Operative management was cost-effective at both 6 months and 1 year, compared with nonoperative treatment, in both models. Operative treatment was found to be even more cost-effective with loss of wages considered, suggesting that an earlier return to baseline function and, thus, return to work are important considerations in making operative treatment the more cost-effective option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The impact of multiple regions of pain and work-life balance among healthcare workers.

BACKGROUND: Although the association of chronic pain (CP) with a poor work-life balance has been well studied, the interaction effect of multiple pain sites on work-life balance is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most prevalent CP site among healthcare workers, the demographic characteristics of the individuals with the predominant pain type, and to assess the interaction of multiple pain sites on work-life balance. METHODS: Using data from the National Health Interview Survey, 2,458 healthcare works were identified for this study. The independent variables were chronic low back and hip pain. The dependent variables were (1) if pain affected their family or significant other, (2) if pain limited their life or work activities, and (3) Usually working >35 hours/week. Multiple logistic regression and an interaction analysis were used to analyze the impact of different pain sites on work-life balance. RESULTS: Among healthcare workers, chronic low back pain was more prevalent than chronic hip pain (69.4% vs 61.4%, p-value<0.001). Respondents with chronic low back pain were mostly 40 - 64 years of age (49.6%), females (71.2%), white (77.6%), married (55.5%), had no college degree (85.4%), earn greater than $75,000 (50.0%). In the interaction analysis, in the presence of chronic hip pain, those with chronic low back pain had an AOR of 2.20 (1.05 - 4.64), p-value 0.038 of chronic low back pain affecting their family and significant others, and an AOR of 2.18 (1.17- 4.05), p-value 0.014 of chronic low back pain affecting their life or work. CONCLUSION: Chronic low back pain was more prevalent than chronic hip pain among healthcare workers. Together both pain sites had a significant impact on the work-life balance of this population. Further studies should assess other dimensions of work-life balance and chronic pain.

Viral Dynamics of Omicron and Delta Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Variants With Implications for Timing of Release from Isolation: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In January 2022, US guidelines shifted to recommend isolation for 5 days from symptom onset, followed by 5 days of mask-wearing. However, viral dynamics and variant and vaccination impact on culture conversion are largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study on a university campus, collecting daily anterior nasal swabs for at least 10 days for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing and culture, with antigen rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) on a subset. We compared culture positivity beyond day 5, time to culture conversion, and cycle threshold trend when calculated from diagnostic test, from symptom onset, by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant, and by vaccination status. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of RDT on days 4-6 compared with culture. RESULTS: Among 92 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive participants, all completed the initial vaccine series; 17 (18.5%) were infected with Delta and 75 (81.5%) with Omicron. Seventeen percent of participants had positive cultures beyond day 5 from symptom onset, with the latest on day 12. There was no difference in time to culture conversion by variant or vaccination status. For 14 substudy participants, sensitivity and specificity of day 4-6 RDT were 100% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of our Delta- and Omicron-infected cohort culture-converted by day 6, with no further impact of booster vaccination on sterilization or cycle threshold decay. We found that rapid antigen testing may provide reassurance of lack of infectiousness, though guidance to mask for days 6-10 is supported by our finding that 17% of participants remained culture-positive after isolation.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Utilization of TKA Among Patients with Posttraumatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Estimates from the United States National Inpatient Sample, 2011-2018.

Advanced posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee is a cause of substantial disability, particularly in younger individuals, and the treatment of choice is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in the use of TKA, but, to our knowledge, there have been no studies examining these disparities among patients with PTOA. Methods: We performed chi-square and logistic regression analyses on data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). The outcome of interest was the rate of TKA utilization, and the primary predictors were racial/ethnic group and insurance status. The regression models were adjusted for age, sex, household income, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: The odds of receiving TKA for Black patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 0.62) and Hispanic patients (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.62) were lower compared with White patients. Patients with Medicare (OR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.57), those with Medicaid (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.55), and those who self-paid (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.25) had significantly lower odds of TKA compared with those with private insurance. Conclusions: Black and Hispanic patients are less likely than White patients to utilize TKA, and patients with private insurance are more likely to utilize TKA. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Viral dynamics of Omicron and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants with implications for timing of release from isolation: a longitudinal cohort study.

Background: In January 2022, United States guidelines shifted to recommend isolation for 5 days from symptom onset, followed by 5 days of mask wearing. However, viral dynamics and variant and vaccination impact on culture conversion are largely unknown. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study on a university campus, collecting daily anterior nasal swabs for at least 10 days for RT-PCR and culture, with antigen rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) on a subset. We compared culture positivity beyond day 5, time to culture conversion, and cycle threshold trend when calculated from diagnostic test, from symptom onset, by SARS-CoV-2 variant, and by vaccination status. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity of RDT on days 4-6 compared to culture. Results: Among 92 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive participants, all completed the initial vaccine series, 17 (18.5%) were infected with Delta and 75 (81.5%) with Omicron. Seventeen percent of participants had positive cultures beyond day 5 from symptom onset with the latest on day 12. There was no difference in time to culture conversion by variant or vaccination status. For the 14 sub-study participants, sensitivity and specificity of RDT were 100% and 86% respectively. Conclusions: The majority of our Delta- and Omicron-infected cohort culture-converted by day 6, with no further impact of booster vaccination on sterilization or cycle threshold decay. We found that rapid antigen testing may provide reassurance of lack of infectiousness, though masking for a full 10 days is necessary to prevent transmission from the 17% of individuals who remain culture positive after isolation. Main Point: Beyond day 5, 17% of our Delta and Omicron-infected cohort were culture positive. We saw no significant impact of booster vaccination on within-host Omicron viral dynamics. Additionally, we found that rapid antigen testing may provide reassurance of lack of infectiousness.

The Role of Health Information Technology in Pneumococcal Vaccination Uptake Among Adults with Heart Disease.

Background:Health information technology (HIT) may influence pneumococcal vaccination uptake in high-risk populations. This study assessed the association of HIT utilization on pneumococcal vaccine (PCV) uptake among adults ≥40 years with heart disease.Methods:This was a cross-sectional study of 2,134 individuals representing 16,813,593 United States adults ≥40 years with heart disease using the National Health Interview Survey data. The independent variables were use of the Internet to (1) look up health information, (2) fill a prescription, and (3) schedule a medical appointment, and use of an e-mail (4) communicate with a health care provider. The dependent variable was PCV uptake. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate group differences, and a multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the association between HIT utilization and PCV uptake.Results:Those who use the Internet to fill up a prescription and to communicate with their health care provider were more likely to take up the PCV (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.37, p = 0.035) and (AOR 1.95; 95% CI 1.23-3.10, p = 0.005) respectively. Compared with those who did not use HIT in any form, those who used HIT in at least three or four forms had a higher PCV uptake (AORs 1.93; 95% CI 1.19-3.13, p = 0.008) and (AOR 2.33 95% CI 1.22-4.47, p = 0.011) respectively.Conclusion:Our analysis shows a positive association of HIT utilization and PCV uptake. It further stresses the importance of electronic health in preventive medicine. This implies that HIT can be used purposively in other aspects of preventive health. Larger studies should evaluate the relationship between different uses of HIT and the uptake of different vaccines.