Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Italy: Results of a Survey Promoted by AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing).

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the organisation of health care in Italy, with an acceleration in the development of telemedicine. To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the spread of remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in Italy, a survey addressed to cardiologists operating in all Italian CIED-implanting centres was launched. A total of 127 cardiologists from 116 Italian arrhythmia centres took part in the survey, 41.0% of all 283 CIED-implanting centres operating in Italy in 2019. All participating centres declared to use RM of CIEDs. COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increase in the use of RM in 83 (71.6%) participating centres. In a temporal perspective, an increase in the median number of patients per centre followed up by RM was found from 2012 to 2017, followed by an exponential increase from 2017 to 2020. In 36 participating centres (31.0%) a telehealth visits service was activated as a replacement for in-person outpatient visits (in patients with or without CIED) during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 pandemic has caused an acceleration in the use of RM of CIEDs and in the use of telemedicine in the clinical practice of cardiology.

Intrahospital organizational model of remote monitoring data sharing, for a global management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a document of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing.

: In recent years, the increasing number of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) has required different approaches in terms of the device's control and surveillance. It is increasingly difficult to keep the traditional in-office protocol device's control: we must think of a different organization dedicated to the activity of remote control and monitoring (RC/RM) of devices and patients.A CIED team structured with nurses, technicians and physicians should be organized inside the hospital, with the aim of CIED patients' managing and of creating a network between the various departments.Small hospitals may not be able to manage independently the CIEDs RC/RM and it is possible to hypothesize the creation of a collaborative network between neighbouring structures.This activity must combine the use of technology with the ability to take care of patients and to maintain adequate and meaningful relationships.

Comparison between anatomical and integrated approaches to atrial fibrillation ablation: adjunctive role of electrical pulmonary vein disconnection.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anatomical pulmonary vein (PV) radiofrequency (RF) ablation with that of an integrated approach (anatomical with electrophysiological confirmation of PV disconnection). METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients affected by drug-refractory paroxysmal (39), persistent (13), and permanent (8) atrial fibrillation (AF) were assigned to an anatomical (group A: 30 patients; 25 male, 5 female, mean age: 55 +/- 7 years) or integrated approach (group B: 30 patients; 26 male, 4 female, mean age: 52 +/- 9 years). In all cases, RF ablation was performed by means of the Carto system in order to anatomically create circumferential lines around PVs. In group B, the persistence of PV potentials was then assessed with a multipolar circular catheter. If PV potentials persisted, RF pulses targeting the electrophysiological breakthroughs were delivered to disconnect PVs. RESULTS: Total procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF delivery time were similar in both groups: 227 +/- 43, 50 +/- 23, and 43 +/- 16 minutes (group A); 232 +/- 32, 55 +/- 15, and 42 +/- 10 minutes (group B), respectively (ns). One asymptomatic PV stenosis and one pericardial effusion occurred in group A and B, respectively. After 15.4 +/- 7.4 months, 17 (57%) group A patients and 25 (83%) group B patients were in stable sinus rhythm (P = 0.02) (RR 1.78; 95% CI: 1.7-2.9). CONCLUSIONS: PV ablation by means of an integrated anatomical and electrophysiological approach seems more effective than a purely anatomical RF ablation approach. Electrophysiological confirmation of PV disconnection could be a useful marker of successful RF treatment of AF.