Race and Ethnic Categories: A Brief Review of Global Terms and Nomenclature.

Terminology regarding descriptors of race and ethnicity have been constantly evolving. Due to differences in terminology, data collection, demographics, and group identity, there are numerous challenges in determining what descriptors are suitable and acceptable to all individuals. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has defined six racial and ethnic categories that should be used for reporting purposes. This review gives a historical background of the definition of the different racial and ethnic categories. This review also aims to define acceptable categories of race and ethnicity to provide guidelines for reports and best practices.

Efficacy of I- gel™ for airway management of neonates with Pierre Robin sequence undergoing glossopexy: A prospective study.

This paper aims to review the utility of I- gel as a successful airway management device for infants with Pierre robin sequence (PRS) undergoing glossopexy. A prospective study was conducted on PRS neonates. The algorithm followed was putting a 'Tongue traction stitch' followed by the following sequence - two trials with direct laryngoscope intubation, two attempts with fiberoptic endoscope intubation followed by insertion of I-gel™ to manage difficult airway during glossopexy procedure. 6 patients were intubated with direct laryngoscope, 12 patients were intubated with fibreoptic endoscope and the rest 13 patients were intubated using I-gel™. Successful management of difficult airway was achieved with this airway management protocol during glossopexy and nil postoperative complications were encountered. Within the limitations of the study it seems that, I-gel™ is a relevant alternative toprovide a reliable and secure airway access to carry out glossopexy procedure in such patients.

Does the Timing of 1-Stage Palatoplasty With Radical Muscle Dissection Effect Long-Term Midface Growth? A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effect of timing of 1-stage palatoplasty on midfacial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. STUDY SETTING: Institutional hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred twelve patients with CLP who underwent palatoplasty and were divided into 3 groups: group I: operated between 9 and 11 months; group II: operated between 18 and 20 months; and group III: operated between 21 and 24 months. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent von Langenbeck palatoplasty technique, which was converted to a Bardach 2-flap technique in case of any technical difficulties. The patients were followed up between 8 and 9 years when they reported for secondary alveolar bone grafting. Postsurgical cephalometric and dental casts measurements were taken for midfacial growth analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cephalometric measures were analyzed for midfacial growth and compared within the groups. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference (P < .01) was found on comparing the cephalometric parameters such as sella-nasion-A point angle (SNA), A point-nasion-B point angle (ANB), n toperpendicular to point A (N-perpA), condylon to point A (Co-A), anterior nasal spine to posterior nasal spine (ANS-PNS), nasion to Anterior nasal spine (N-ANS), nasion to menton (N Me), and witts appraisal (Witt (AO-BO)) in group I when compared to both group II and group III patients, implying deficient midfacial growth in group I. No statistical difference was found in the cephalometric values between group II and group III. Group II had better cephalometric measurements than group III, showing better growth in group II than group III. Overall, there was less incidence of midfacial hypoplasia in patients treated between 18 and 20 months (group II). CONCLUSION: We conclude that palatal closure carried out at 18 to 20 months and 21 to 24 months is associated with better midfacial growth when compared to closure at 9 to 11 months. The best time to operate would be between 18 and 20 months to avoid speech disturbances. Midfacial growth can be greatly influenced by the timing of 1-stage palatoplasty.

Correlation between surgical protocols for palatoplasty and midfacial growth in cleft lip and palate patients: A long-term, single centre study.

To evaluate and compare the outcomes of two different surgical protocols for palatoplasty for midfacial growth in patients with cleft lip and palate. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in 80 patients with cleft lip and palate, who were divided into two groups. Group 1 comprised patients who underwent operation between 9 and 11 months of age using the Bardach two-flap technique without a palatal pushback. Group 2 comprised patients who had undergone operation between 18 and 20 months of age using either a Bardach two-flap technique with a palatal pushback or a von Langenbeck technique. Patient follow-up was done between 8 and 9 years of age when they reported to the centre for secondary alveolar bone grafting. Post-surgical cephalometric measurements were taken for midfacial growth analysis. Group 1 underwent palatoplasty at significantly younger ages than Group 2 (p < 0.01). A statistically significant difference(p < 0.01) was found between the two groups of patients on comparison of cephalometric parameters such as SNA, ANB, CoA, NperpA ANS-PNS, N-ANS, N-Me, Witt's (AO-BO). Group 2 had more positive cephalometric values as compared to Group 1, thereby implying that there was less incidence of midfacial hypoplasia in patients treated at the age of 18-20 months. Between the types of palatoplasty techniques within Group 2, i.e., Bardach two-flap and von Langenbeck, there was no statistical difference found in the post-opertative cephalometric values, i.e., SNA, ANB, CoA, ANS-PNS, N-ANS, N-Me, Witt's (AO-BO) except for Nperp-A, which showed a statistical difference (p = 0.03). Within the limitations of the study which is only a single center experience it seems that palatal closure should be carried out at 18-20 months of age for better midfacial growth, leading to decreased incidence of maxillary hypoplasia at a later stage in life. Repair at less than 18 months of age is also associated with mid-facial hypoplasia.