Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal cefazolin and ceftazidime coadministered to CAPD patients.

PURPOSE: Guidelines for empiric treatment of PD-related peritonitis published in 2000 recommend concurrent intraperitoneal (IP) cefazolin and ceftazidime. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of these agents combined have not been studied. This study was designed to determine the PK of combined IP cefazolin and ceftazidime in CAPD patients. DESIGN: Prospective PK study in seven non-infected CAPD patients. PROCEDURES: Patients had a peritoneal equilibration test (PET), then received one IP dose of cefazolin and ceftazidime (15 mg/kg each) co-administered over a 4-hour dwell, then performed three CAPD exchanges over the next 16 hours. Serum and dialysate samples collected over the 20-hour study period were assayed for drug concentrations by HPLC. OUTCOME MEASURES: PK parameters. STATISTICAL METHODS: Correlations were tested between PET and PK parameters using the Pearson-product correlation coefficient. MAIN FINDINGS: Serum cefazolin and ceftazidime levels exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations for susceptible organisms (8 mg/L) throughout the 20 hour study period. Mean cefazolin and ceftazidime PK parameters included: bioavailability, 71% and 63%; elimination rate constant, 0.031 and 0.045 h -1 ; total clearance, 5.8 and 16.0 ml/min; peritoneal clearance, 1.6 and 3.9 ml/min; renal clearance, 2.3 and 3.9 ml/min, respectively. Predictive equations suggest that 1000 mg IP of cefazolin and of ceftazidime every 24 hours would produce average steady-state trough serum cefazolin and ceftazidime concentrations of 70 +/- 52 mg/L and 17 +/- 7 mg/L, respectively. There was no correlation between PET and PK parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration did not adversely affect the PK of either agent. IP cefazolin and ceftazidime (15 mg/kg) produced adequate serum and dialysate concentrations in CAPD patients for 20 hours. PK predictions suggest that most patients would achieve adequate cefazolin and ceftazidime concentrations with 1000 mg IP once-daily. Anuric patients and those with significant residual renal function may require a more individualized approach.

Nutritional markers during peritoneal dialysis: data from the 1998 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study.

OBJECTIVE: This analysis explores the nutritional status of adult U.S. peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. DESIGN: The Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study is a prospective cross-sectional prevalence survey describing the care provided to a random sample of adult U.S. PD patients. METHODS AND POPULATION: Prevalence data were collected from a national random sample of 1381 adult PD patients participating in the United States End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program. RESULTS: The median age of these patients was 55 years, 61% were Caucasian; the leading cause of ESRD was diabetes mellitus. Age, sex, size, peritoneal permeability, dialysis adequacy, and nutritional indices did not differ between patients on continuous ambulatory PD and patients on automated PD. The dialysis prescriptions employed achieved mean weekly Kt/V urea (wKt/V) and creatinine clearance (wCCr) values of 2.22 +/- 0.57 and 67.8 +/- 22.5 L/1.73 m2/week, respectively. The PD patients were large, with a mean body weight of 77 +/- 21 kg and body mass index (BMI) of 27 +/- 8.6 kg/m2. The mean serum albumin of these patients was 3.5 +/- 0.51 g/dL, and 43% of values fell below the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative's desired range. The PD patients had a normalized protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (nPNA) of 1.0 +/- 0.57 g/kg/day, a normalized creatinine appearance rate (nCAR) of 17 +/- 7.3 mg/kg/day, and an estimated lean body mass (%LBM) of 62% +/- 18% of body weight. Serum albumin correlated positively with patient size, nCAR, and nPNA, but negatively with age, the presence of diabetes mellitus, female gender, erythropoietin dose, the creatinine dialysate-to-plasma ratio results of peritoneal equilibration testing, and the dialysis portion of the wCCr. The duration of ESRD experience correlated negatively with both serum albumin and patient size, although these relationships were complex. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal dialysis patients generally have marginal serum albumin levels, a finding incongruent with alternative measures of nutritional status, such as weight, BMI, and creatinine generation. Serum albumin is reduced in patients with high peritoneal permeability (i.e., rapid transporters) and, because these patients generally have higher than average wCCr values, serum albumin is inversely correlated with the dialysis component of the wCCr. The presumptive nutritional indicators (BMI, %LBM, nPNA, and serum albumin) provide disparate estimates, varying from 10% to 50% for the prevalence of nutritionally stressed PD patients.

Intravenous vancomycin pharmacokinetics in automated peritoneal dialysis patients.

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) vancomycin was studied in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients who received a single i.v. dose of vancomycin (15 mg/kg total body weight). Dialysate samples were collected at the beginning, middle, and end of dwells 1-3 (on-cycler), and at the end of dwells 4 and 5 (off-cycler), for a 24-hour period. Blood samples were collected at the beginning, middle, and end of dwells 1-3 (on-cycler), and at the end of dwell 5 (off-cycler) for a 24-hr period. Pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated assuming a one-compartment model. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and vancomycin clearance (CI) values were normalized to 1.73 m2. Ten patients [4 males, 6 females; 47.4 +/- 9.9 years of age (mean +/- SD)] who had received PD for a median 3.5 months (range 2-66 months) were studied. Dwell times were 2.3 +/- 0.1 hours on cycler and 7.3 +/- 0.1 hours off cycler. Vancomycin half-life was significantly different on-cycler than off-cycler (11.6 +/- 5.2 hr vs 62.8 +/- 33.0 hr; p < 0.001). Vancomycin total CI (CI(T)) was 7.4 +/- 2.0 mL/min. Renal CI (CI(R)) and PD CI (CI(PD)) accounted for 23.6% and 28.0% of CI(T). respectively. CI(R) correlated with GFR (CI(R) = 0.90 GFR - 1.01; r2 = 0.79; p = 0.008). Mean vancomycin serum and dialysate end-of-dwell concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentration of susceptible organisms (5 micro/mL) for the first cycler and the second ambulatory exchanges only. The results of this study suggest that, to provide adequate concentrations for susceptible organisms over a 24-hour period, current intermittent vancomycin dosing recommendations for PD-related peritonitis need to be changed to 35 mg/kg intraperitoneally on day 1, then 15 mg/kg i.p. thereafter (i.e., once daily) in APD patients.

Cefazolin dialytic clearance by high-efficiency and high-flux hemodialyzers.

Cefazolin dialytic clearance has not been determined in patients undergoing hemodialysis with high-efficiency or high-flux dialyzers. The objective of this study is to determine the pharmacokinetics and dialytic clearance of cefazolin and develop dosing strategies in these patients. Twenty-five uninfected subjects undergoing chronic thrice-weekly hemodialysis were administered a single dose of intravenous cefazolin (15 mg/kg) after their standard hemodialysis session. Fifteen subjects underwent hemodialysis with high-efficiency hemodialyzers, and 10 subjects underwent hemodialysis with high-flux hemodialyzers. Blood and urine samples were collected serially over the interdialytic period, during the next intradialytic period, and immediately after the next hemodialysis session. Serum and urine concentrations of cefazolin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Differential equations describing a two-compartment model were fit to the cefazolin serum concentration-time data over the study period, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Mean dialytic clearance values for cefazolin were significantly greater in the high-flux group compared with the high-efficiency group (30.9 +/- 6.52 versus 18.0 +/- 6.26 mL/min, respectively; P: < 0.05). Cefazolin reduction ratios were significantly greater (0.62 +/- 0.08 versus 0.50 +/- 0.07; P: < 0.005) in the high-flux group compared with the high-efficiency group and correlated well with equilibrated urea reduction. The pharmacokinetic model developed from patient data was used to simulate cefazolin serum concentration data for high-efficiency and high-flux dialyzers. Cefazolin doses of 15 or 20 mg/kg after each hemodialysis session maintained adequate serum concentrations throughout a 2- or 3-day interdialytic period regardless of hemodialyzer type.

Parenteral iron use in the management of anemia in end-stage renal disease patients.

Intravenous iron is required by most dialysis patients receiving erythropoietin (EPO) to maintain an adequate hematocrit. In the United States, there are currently two parenteral iron preparations, iron dextran and iron gluconate, approved for such use, and a third product, iron sucrose, is under development. This article reviews each of these products. Each of the iron products increases the efficacy of EPO use in anemia management. There is considerable experience in the United States and elsewhere with the use of iron dextran. Although it is clinically effective, iron dextran is also associated with significant morbidity from both dose-dependent and -independent side effects. The slow release of iron from this complex necessitates a delay in monitoring iron indices after the administration of large doses of iron dextran. Recommended doses of iron sucrose appear very safe with little risk of anaphylactic reactions. Adverse effects are uncommon and not life threatening. If approved for use in the United States, iron sucrose may be a safe and effective alternative to iron dextran. Iron dissociates from iron gluconate quite rapidly and may increase the production of ionized free iron. Iron gluconate may be a safe alternative to iron dextran for patients with severe reactions, including anaphylaxis. The risk of allergic reactions to iron gluconate is very low. The exact place in therapy for the newer iron complexes remains unclear. Currently available data suggest that iron sucrose and iron gluconate may have diminished adverse effect profiles when compared with iron dextran. Additional clinical experience will establish the role for these new iron products.

Intermittent intravenous piperacillin pharmacokinetics in automated peritoneal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Use of intermittent antibiotic dosing is increasing in the treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. We studied the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) piperacillin in automated PD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients (3 males, 5 females) were recruited and received a single i.v. dose of piperacillin (35 mg/kg actual body weight). Blood and dialysate samples were collected at the beginning, middle, and end of dwells 1-3 (on cycler), and end of dwells 4-5 (off cycler) for a 24-hour period. Baseline and 24-hour urine samples (nonanuric patients, n = 7) were collected. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated assuming a one-compartment model. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and piperacillin clearance (CL) values were normalized to 1.73 m2. RESULTS: The patients were 49.5 +/- 10.1 years of age (mean +/- SD) and had been receiving PD for a median of 3 months (range 2-66 months). Dwell times were 2.25 +/- 0.06 hours on cycler and 7.26 +/- 0.14 hours off cycler. Piperacillin half-life was not statistically different on or off the cycler (on cycler 1.99 +/- 0.39 hr, off cycler 4.39 +/- 5.4 hr; p = 0.12) and remained insignificant, even accounting for an outlier (on cycler 2.01 +/- 0.41 hr, off cycler 2.54 +/- 1.48 hr; p = 0.19). Piperacillin total CL (CL(T)) was 31.29 +/- 6.02 mL/minute. Renal CL (CL(R)) and PD CL (CL(PD)) accounted for 8.8% and 16.8% of CL(T); CL(R) correlated well with GFR (CL(R) = 0.86 GFR + 0.1; p < 0.00003). Mean piperacillin serum and dialysate end-of-dwell concentrations were above minimum inhibitory concentration of susceptible organisms (8 microg/mL) for the three cycler exchanges only. Serum and dialysate concentrations predicted using a one-compartment model suggest that i.v. piperacillin 4000 mg would provide adequate concentrations for susceptible organisms over a 12-hour period. CONCLUSION: The current i.v. piperacillin dosing recommendations of 4000 mg every 12 hours for PD-related peritonitis are appropriate for patients on automated PD. Intermittent intraperitoneal piperacillin is not recommended.

Correlation of intraperitoneal antibiotic pharmacokinetics and peritoneal membrane transport characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: To identify correlations between the pharmacokinetic variables that describe drug disposition in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and the measures used to assess dialysis adequacy. DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective study re-evaluated data collected during previous pharmacokinetic studies for intraperitoneally administered cefazolin, ceftazidime, and gentamicin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, and intravenous cefazolin and tobramycin in automated PD patients. Pharmacokinetic variables were compared to creatinine clearance (CCr), Kt/V, and peritoneal equilibration test data using the Pearson product correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: Prominent correlations were found between renal CCr and renal Kt/V, with renal clearances of CAPD cefazolin and ceftazidime, and automated PD tobramycin and cefazolin (r values ranged from 0.698 to 0.986; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings support current peritonitis treatment recommendations that patients with residual renal function may require higher doses or more frequent drug administration.

Erythropoietin and iron use in peritoneal dialysis patients. Report from the 1997 HCFA end-stage renal disease core indicators project.

The HCFA ESRD Core Indicators Project is designed to assess several key indicators of care in peritoneal dialysis patients, including anemia management. Information on hematocrit levels, epoetin alfa dosing, estimates of iron stores, and iron therapy as obtained in a national sample of 1,219 peritoneal dialysis patients are described. The average hematocrit was 32.8% +/- 3.8%, and severe anemia (hematocrit < 25%) occurred in 1.4% of PD patients. The mean weekly epoetin alfa dose was 134.6 U/kg. In general, there was an inverse relationship between hematocrit and epoetin alfa doses. Most (83%) of PD patients received iron therapy, with only 8% of patients receiving intravenous iron. The mean serum ferritin was 303 ng/mL, with 64% of patients having a ferritin greater than 100 ng/mL. The mean transferrin saturation was 28%, with 60% of patients having a value of less than 20%. There was an inverse relationship between serum ferritin levels and hematocrit but no relationship between hematocrit and transferrin. It is concluded that there could be improvement in the epoetin alfa and iron management in many patients.

Trends in clinical indicators of care for adult peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States from 1995 to 1997. ESRD Core Indicators Workgroup.

BACKGROUND: This article describes the changes in four core indicator variables: dialysis adequacy, hematocrit, serum albumin, and blood pressure in peritoneal dialysis CAPD and cycler patients over a three-year period. METHODS: A national random sample of adult peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States was drawn each study period. Clinical data abstraction forms were completed by facility staff for patients selected for the sample, returned to the respective network, then forwarded to the Health Care Financing Administration for analysis. RESULTS: The mean weekly Kt/V urea for CAPD patients increased from 1.91 in 1995 to 2.12 in 1997 (P < 0.001) and for cycler patients, from 2.12 in 1996 to 2.24 in 1997 (P < 0.05). The mean weekly creatinine clearance for CAPD patients increased from 61.48 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1995 to 65.84 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1997 (P < 0.05). For cycler patients, it increased from 63.37 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1996 to 67.45 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1997 (P < 0.05). Despite this increase in adequacy values, less than 40% of peritoneal dialysis patients in 1997 had weekly Kt/V urea or creatinine clearance values that met subsequently published National Kidney Foundation's Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines. These data suggest that the dialysis prescription may not be adequately modified to compensate for increased body weight and for decreased residual renal function as years on dialysis increase. The average hematocrit value increased modestly in both CAPD and cycler patients from 1995 to 1997, and the number of patients with a hematocrit of less than 25% decreased from 6% in 1995 to 1.4% in 1997 (P < 0.001). Both serum albumin values and systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were essentially unchanged during the three-year period of observation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in dialysis adequacy and hematocrit values, there remains much room for improvement in these core indicator values.

Pharmacokinetics of intermittent intraperitoneal cefazolin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters of intermittent intraperitoneal (IP) cefazolin, and recommend a cefazolin dosing regimen in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized open study. SETTING: CAPD outpatient clinic in Albany, New York. PATIENTS: Seven volunteer CAPD patients without peritonitis. Three of the patients were nonanuric while 4 were anuric. INTERVENTIONS: Cefazolin (15 mg/kg total body weight) was given to each patient during the first peritoneal exchange. Blood and dialysate samples were collected at times 0, 0.5, 1,2,3,6 (end of the first antibiotic-containing dwell), 24, and 48 hours after the administration of IP cefazolin. Urine samples were collected in nonanuric patients over the study period. RESULTS: The mean+/-SD amount of cefazolin dose absorbed from the dialysate after the 6-hour dwell was 69.7%+/-8.0% of the administered dose. The cefazolin absorption rate constant from dialysate to serum was 0.21+/-0.1/hr (absorption half-life 3.5+/-0.8 hr). The mean serum concentrations reached at 24 and 48 hours were 52.4+/-3.7 mg/L and 30.3+/-5.9 mg/L, respectively. The mean dialysate cefazolin concentrations reached at 24 and 48 hours were 15.1+/-3.4 mg/L and 7.9+/-1.4 mg/L, respectively. The cefazolin serum elimination rate constant was 0.02+/-0.01/hr (elimination half-life 31.5+/-8.8 hr). The total cefazolin body clearance was 3.4+/-0.6 ml/min. In the 3 nonanuric patients the mean renal clearance of cefazolin was 0.6+/-0.4 ml/min. The peritoneal clearance of cefazolin was 1.0+/-0.3 mL/min. The systemic volume of distribution of cefazolin was 0.2+/-0.05 L/kg. No statistical difference was detected in pharmacokinetic parameters between anuric and nonanuric patients, although this may be due to the small number of patients in each group. CONCLUSION: A single daily dose of cefazolin dosed at 15 mg/kg actual body weight in CAPD patients is effective in achieving serum concentration levels greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration for sensitive organisms over 48 hours, and dialysate concentration levels over 24 hours. Caution is warranted in extrapolation of dosing recommendations to patients who maintain a significant degree of residual renal function.

Pharmacokinetics of intermittent intraperitoneal ceftazidime.

Ceftazidime is currently recommended as an alternative first-line agent in the treatment of peritonitis and for Pseudomonas peritonitis. The pharmacokinetics of intermittent intraperitoneal (i.p.) ceftazidime have been poorly characterized. This study was designed to characterize the pharmacokinetic disposition of a single dose of ceftazidime in anuric and non-anuric CAPD patients, over 48 hours. This was a prospective, open label, pharmacokinetic study. The study was conducted in an independent, outpatient dialysis center. Ten volunteer continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with and without residual renal function, no peritonitis or antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks, and on CAPD for at least 2 months were recruited. Patients received a single dose of i.p. ceftazidime (15 mg/kg) in the first daytime exchange over a 6-hour dwell, after an overnight dwell. Serum, urine, and dialysate were collected over a 48-hour period. A high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay was used to analyze ceftazidime in these samples. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Six of the 10 patients were non-anuric with a mean residual renal creatinine clearance of 2.9 +/- 1.6 mL/min. The mean +/- SD bioavailability was 72% +/- 14%, and the volume of distribution was 0.34 +/- 0.08 L/kg. The mean serum elimination half-life of 22 +/- 5 hours. The peritoneal clearance was 5.74 +/- 1.6 mL/min. No difference was detected between anuric and nonanuric patients. Mean plasma and dialysate concentrations at 24 hours were 24 +/- 6 microg/mL and 18 +/- 7 microg/mL, respectively, and were 12.0 +/- 3.6 microg/mL and 7.4 +/- 3.1 microg/mL at 48 hours, respectively. Once-daily i.p. dosing of ceftazidime achieves serum and dialysate levels greater than the MIC of sensitive organisms over 48 hours.