Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis (HD) requires safe and effective anticoagulation to prevent clot formation within the extracorporeal circuit during dialysis treatments to enable adequate dialysis and minimise adverse events, including major bleeding. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may provide a more predictable dose, reliable anticoagulant effects and be simpler to administer than unfractionated heparin (UFH) for HD anticoagulation, but may accumulate in the kidneys and lead to bleeding. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation strategies (including both heparin and non-heparin drugs) for long-term HD in people with kidney failure. Any intervention preventing clotting within the extracorporeal circuit without establishing anticoagulation within the patient, such as regional citrate, citrate enriched dialysate, heparin-coated dialysers, pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF), and saline flushes were also included. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to November 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled studies (quasi-RCTs) evaluating anticoagulant agents administered during HD treatment in adults and children with kidney failure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool and extracted data. Treatment effects were estimated using random effects meta-analysis and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE). MAIN RESULTS: We included 113 studies randomising 4535 participants. The risk of bias in each study was adjudicated as high or unclear for most risk domains. Compared to UFH, LMWH had uncertain effects on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis (3 studies, 91 participants: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.42; I2 = 8%; low certainty evidence), while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate anticoagulation may lower the risk of minor bleeding compared to UFH (2 studies, 82 participants: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.85; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). No studies reported data comparing regional citrate to UFH on risks of extracorporeal circuit thrombosis and major bleeding. The effects of very LMWH, danaparoid, prostacyclin, direct thrombin inhibitors, factor XI inhibitors or heparin-grafted membranes were uncertain due to insufficient data. The effects of different LMWH, different doses of LMWH, and the administration of LMWH anticoagulants using inlet versus outlet bloodline or bolus versus infusion were uncertain. Evidence to compare citrate to another citrate or control was scant. The effects of UFH compared to no anticoagulant therapy or different doses of UFH were uncertain. Death, dialysis vascular access outcomes, blood transfusions, measures of anticoagulation effect, and costs of interventions were rarely reported. No studies evaluated the effects of treatment on non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospital admissions. Adverse events were inconsistently and rarely reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant strategies, including UFH and LMWH, have uncertain comparative risks on extracorporeal circuit thrombosis, while major bleeding and minor bleeding were not adequately reported. Regional citrate may decrease minor bleeding, but the effects on major bleeding and extracorporeal circuit thrombosis were not reported. Evidence supporting clinical decision-making for different forms of anticoagulant strategies for HD is of low and very low certainty, as available studies have not been designed to measure treatment effects on important clinical outcomes.

Plasma levels of enoxaparin oligosaccharides, antifactor-Xa and thrombin generation in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

: Low molecular weight heparins are used during haemodialysis for thromboprophylaxis of the dialysis circuit, with plasma antifactor-Xa (anti-Xa) activity used as a surrogate measure for effective anticoagulation. However, this pharmacokinetic parameter does not always correlate with pharmacodynamic effects in patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between actual plasma levels of the low molecular weight heparins enoxaparin, anti-Xa activity, and global coagulation measurement of thrombin generation during haemodialysis. Blood was analysed from 16 adult patients with end-stage kidney disease at 0, 2, 4 h, and at completion of 31 dialysis sessions where single fixed doses of 20 (n = 3), 40 (n = 16), 60 (n = 6), or 80 (n = 6) mg of enoxaparin (equating to 0.23-1.07 mg/kg) were used as thromboprophylaxis. Plasma enoxaparin oligosaccharides [degree of polymerization (dp)6-dp16] were measured by high-performance size exclusion chromatography, anti-Xa activity by colourimetric assay, and thrombin generation by calibrated automated thrombogram. Plasma enoxaparin fragments were undetectable at the beginning of each dialysis, peaked at 2 h to levels that correlated with dose (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) then remained relatively stable. In contrast, therapeutic anti-Xa levels achieved at 2 h in 18 cases (58%) quickly dropped to only six cases (19%) at the end of dialysis, by which time thrombin generation had also recovered in 81% of patients. Statistical modelling revealed a threshold value of anti-Xa at 0.53 IU/ml that supressed thrombin generation to 15.28% of baseline (P < 0.001). Despite loss of anticoagulant activity in the majority of patients, plasma levels of enoxaparin oligosaccharides remained detectable and relatively unchanged throughout dialysis.

BCR-ABL1 gene rearrangement as a subclonal change in ETV6-RUNX1-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We report here on a case of ETV6-RUNX1-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) that has acquired a BCR-ABL1 gene rearrangement as a subclonal change. The 19-year-old female patient presented with B symptoms, pancytopenia, and circulating blasts. The bone marrow aspirate was hypercellular and was infiltrated by an immature blast population that was confirmed as B-ALL by flow cytometry. Sequential fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed on the patient's leukemic cells, which were shown to contain both ETV6-RUNX1 and BCR-ABL1 gene rearrangements. The majority of nuclei (85%) showed only the ETV6-RUNX1 gene rearrangement; however, an additional 10% also showed a variant BCR-ABL1 gene rearrangement, indicating the ETV6-RUNX1 gene rearrangement was the primary change. A review of the literature has shown that acquisition of a BCR-ABL1 gene rearrangement as a secondary change in B-ALL is a very rare occurrence, and the effect it may have on prognosis is uncertain in the modern therapy age.