Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2399963, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39239877

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sensor technology could provide solutions to monitor postures and motions and to help hospital patients reach their rehabilitation goals with minimal supervision. Synthesized information on device applications and methodology is lacking. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of device applications and methodological approaches to monitor postures and motions in hospitalized patients using sensor technology. METHODS: A systematic search of Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar was completed in February 2023 and updated in March 2024. Included studies described populations of hospitalized adults with short admission periods and interventions that use sensor technology to objectively monitor postures and motions. Study selection was performed by two authors independently of each other. Data extraction and narrative analysis focused on the applications and methodological approaches of included articles using a personalized standard form to extract information on device, measurement and analysis characteristics of included studies and analyse frequencies and usage. RESULTS: A total of 15.032 articles were found and 49 articles met the inclusion criteria. Devices were most often applied in older adults (n = 14), patients awaiting or after surgery (n = 14), and stroke (n = 6). The main goals were gaining insight into patient physical behavioural patterns (n = 19) and investigating physical behaviour in relation to other parameters such as muscle strength or hospital length of stay (n = 18). The studies had heterogeneous study designs and lacked completeness in reporting on device settings, data analysis, and algorithms. Information on device settings, data analysis, and algorithms was poorly reported. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on monitoring postures and motions are heterogeneous in their population, applications and methodological approaches. More uniformity and transparency in methodology and study reporting would improve reproducibility, interpretation and generalization of results. Clear guidelines for reporting and the collection and sharing of raw data would benefit the field by enabling study comparison and reproduction.


In a clinical setting, wearables are currently used to monitor postures and motions in a wide variety of study applications and hospital populations.Measurement of postures and motions in the hospital setting is characterized by methodological heterogeneity. This poses a significant challenge, impacting the interpretation of results and hindering meaningful comparisons between studiesFollowing guidelines for reporting and the collection and sharing of raw data would benefit the field.


Asunto(s)
Postura , Humanos , Postura/fisiología , Hospitalización , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Pacientes Internos , Movimiento/fisiología , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(1)2023 Dec 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38203041

RESUMEN

Sedentary behaviors and low physical activity among hospitalized patients have detrimental effects on health and recovery. Wearable activity monitors are a promising tool to promote mobilization and physical activity. However, existing devices have limitations in terms of their outcomes and validity. The Activ8 device was optimized for the hospital setting. This study assessed the concurrent validity of the modified Activ8. Hospital patients performed an activity protocol that included basic (e.g., walking) and functional activities (e.g., room activities), with video recordings serving as the criterion method. The assessed outcomes were time spent walking, standing, upright, sedentary, and newly added elements of steps and transfers. Absolute and relative time differences were calculated, and Wilcoxon and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted. Overall, the observed relative time differences were lower than 2.9% for the basic protocol and 9.6% for the functional protocol. Statistically significant differences were detected in specific categories, including basic standing (p < 0.05), upright time (p < 0.01), and sedentary time (p < 0.01), but they did not exceed the predetermined 10% acceptable threshold. The modified Activ8 device is a valid tool for assessing body postures, motions, steps, and transfer counts in hospitalized patients. This study highlights the potential of wearable activity monitors to accurately monitor and promote PA among hospital patients.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Pacientes Internos , Humanos , Movimiento (Física) , Monitores de Ejercicio , Posición de Pie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA