Cauda equina, conus medullaris and syndromes mimicking sciatic pain: WFNS spine committee recommendations.

Introduction: Cauda equina syndrome (CES), conus medullaris syndrome (CMS), and sciatica-like syndromes or "sciatica mimics" (SM) may present as diagnostic and/or therapeutic dilemmas for the practicing spine surgeon. There is considerable controversy regarding the appropriate definition and diagnosis of these entities, as well as indications for and timing of surgery. Our goal is to formulate the most current, evidence-based recommendations for the definition, diagnosis, and management of CES, CMS, and SM syndromes. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed from 2012 to 2022 using the keywords "cauda equina syndrome", "conus medullaris syndrome", "sciatica", and "sciatica mimics". Standardized screening criteria yielded a total of 43 manuscripts, whose data was summarized and presented at two international consensus meetings of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. Utilizing the Delphi method, we generated seven final consensus statements. Results and conclusion: s: We provide standardized definitions of cauda equina, cauda equina syndrome, conus medullaris, and conus medullaris syndrome. We advocate for the use of the Lavy et al classification system to categorize different types of CES, and recommend urgent MRI in all patients with suspected CES (CESS), considering the low sensitivity of clinical examination in excluding CES. Surgical decompression for CES and CMS is recommended within 48 h, preferably within less than 24 h. There is no data regarding the role of steroids in acute CES or CMS. The treating physician should be cognizant of a variety of other pathologies that may mimic sciatica, including piriformis syndrome, and how to manage these.

SimSpine: A Cost-Effective Spinal Endoscopy Training Prototype for Neurosurgical Residents Skills Training.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the SimSpine (indigenously developed, low-cost model) and EasyGO! (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) systems for simulation of endoscopic discectomy. METHODS: Twelve neurosurgery residents, 6 in postgraduate years 1-4 or equivalent (junior) and 6 in postgraduate years 5-6 or equivalent (senior), were randomly allocated (1:1) to either EasyGO! or SimSpine endoscopic visualization systems for endoscopic lumbar discectomy simulation on the same physical simulator. After the first exercise, the participants switched over to the other system, and the exercise was repeated. Time taken to dock the system, time to reach annulus, time required for task completion, dural violation, and volume of disc material removed were used for calculating objective efficiency score. Subjective scoring (Neurosurgery Education and Training School [NETS] criteria) was performed by 4 blinded mentors based on recorded video on 2 separate occasions 2 weeks apart. Cumulative score was calculated based on efficiency and Neurosurgery Education and Training School scores. RESULTS: Performance metrics were similar across the 2 platforms, regardless of participant seniority (P > 0.05). Time to reach disc space and discectomy time improved for both EasyGO! (P = 0.07 and P = 0.03, respectively) and SimSpine (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively) between first and second exercises. Efficiency and cumulative scores were better (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03 respectively) when EasyGO! was used as the first device compared with SimSpine. CONCLUSIONS: SimSpine is a cost-effective viable alternative to EasyGO for endoscopic lumbar discectomy simulation-based training.

Telementoring Feasibility Using a Novel Low-cost Lazy Glass Microsurgical Simulator: A "Proof of Concept" Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: In order to mitigate the challenges in microsurgical skill acquisition and training, especially in the COVID-19 era, we devised a novel microsurgical telementoring protocol for imparting microsurgical skill training in a socially distanced setting. We objectively analyzed its feasibility among neurosurgical trainees. METHODS: In a controlled experimental design, 8 residents at different stages of their tenure participated in a lazy glass microsurgical simulator-based telementoring exercise. Microsuturing with 4-0 silk, 10-0 nylon on silastic sheets, and eggshell peeling tasks were performed by the residents prior to and after a telementoring session by a panel of 4 neurosurgical experts. Impact of telementoring was assessed in terms of surgical accuracy, efficiency, and dexterity by providing objective (Performance score [PS]), subjective (Neurosurgery Education and Training School [NETS] score), and cumulative scores (CS). Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact at different stages of residency. RESULTS: PS, NETS score, and CS were significantly improved by telementoring sessions for 10-0 nylon micro-suturing (P < 0.001), and egg-hell peeling tasks (P < 0.01). PS and CS improved significantly (P = 0.01) after telementoring sessions for 4-0 silk microsuturing. Both pre- and post-training CS were similar across the 2 subgroups PGY 1-4 and PGY 5-6 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Telementoring is a viable alternative for neurosurgical resident training in the COVID-19 era, where reduction in elective surgeries and social distancing norms preclude conventional teaching. Lazy glass microsurgical simulator-based structured telementoring protocol is a cost-effective tool to augment surgical proficiency and finesse, irrespective of stage of residency.

Lazy Glass Microsurgical Trainer: A Frugal Solution for Microsurgical Training.

BACKGROUND: The art of surgery is becoming increasingly complex and dependent on scopes, screens, and technology, inviting a complex learning curve and development of hand-eye coordination and dexterity among other skills. We introduce an affordable, do-it-yourself microsurgical simulator that can be set up using a smartphone and a pair of reflective prism glasses. The glasses employ periscopic prisms on either side that reflect light perpendicularly. When the visual input is combined with the magnification of a smartphone camera, a real-time microsurgical experience can be simulated. METHODS: We analyzed the performance of 2 trainee residents in performing their first 5 successful sutures with 5-0 polypropylene thread on the cut ends of a glove over the course of 3 months. The module was also assessed in a survey at an international conference of neurosurgeons. RESULTS: A significant improvement was observed in both residents at the end of each month versus baseline (P < 0.05). Of 27 survey participants, 3 (11%) reported access to a training laboratory in their institute. The module was rated 4/5 in terms of hand-eye coordination, 3.5/5 in management of microsurgical field, and 3.5/5 in depth perception. CONCLUSIONS: The microsurgical simulation technique proved to be useful in performing complex microsurgical tasks. A significant improvement in microsurgical skills was observed among our trainees. The cost of building the module can be as low as U.S. $5. We endorse the use of this technique for resident training and skill development, especially in resource-challenged environments.