RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Precise planning and execution is key for neuroendoscopic interventions, which can be based on different available aiding technologies. The aim of this retrospective study is to report a case-based use of guided neuroendoscopy and to develop a stratification algorithm for the available technologies. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive neuroendoscopic cases performed at our center from 2016 to 2018. We distinguished between patients receiving a new burr hole (group A) and those with a preexisting burr hole (group B). Case-specific technical requirements for procedure planning and execution, complication rate, surgical outcome, and possible subsequent surgery were evaluated. From this experience, a stratification system was developed to tailor the available guiding technologies. RESULTS: A total of 309 neuroendoscopic interventions in 243 patients were included in the present study. The cases included hydrocephalic (81.6%) and nonhydrocephalic (18.4%) conditions. The interventions were supported by coordinate-based (group A, n = 49; group B, n = 67), guide-based (group A, n = 42; group B, n = 0), ultrasound-guided (group A, n = 50; group B, n = 7), or navigated augmented reality-guided (group A, n = 85; group B, n = 9) techniques. The overall complication rate was 4.5%. Stratified by the surgical indication, fontanel status, entry point localization, presence of a preexisting burr hole, ventricular size, and number of targets, an approach toward image-guided neuroendoscopy is suggested. CONCLUSIONS: Planning and technical guidance is essential in neuroendoscopic procedures. The stratified decision-making algorithm for different available technologies aims to achieve lower cost and time consumption, which was found to be safe and efficient. Further investigations are warranted to deliver solid data on procedure efficiency.