Headaches treatment with EMG biofeedback: a focused systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to present an up-to-date evaluation of the efficacy of EMG-biofeedback (EMG-BFB) for primary headaches and to address possible mediators of outcome. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Pedro databases were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies using an EMG-BFB to treat headache have been included in this systematic review. The current systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022312827). Methodological quality was assessed through the Risk of Bias tool 2 (RoB 2). The effect sizes and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by random-effect models on frequency, intensity, and duration variables. Egger regression and the Begg-Mazumdar rank correlation test were used for publication bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 3059 articles were identified through the database searches. 29 articles, involving 1342 participants, met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review; of them, 4 were included in the meta-analysis. Ten studies reported a significant improvement in the EMG-BFB group with respect to the control group. Meta-analyses show a reduction in the intensity of attacks in patients subjected to EMG-BFB (ES 0.21 [(95% CI=-0.02; 0.44), P value=0.07] based on 293 patients). CONCLUSIONS: EMG-BFB represents a non-pharmacological approach to headache treatment as shown via qualitative synthesis, despite not impressive results, this technique can be particularly useful in paediatric or in adult patients who cannot undergo drug therapies. Quantitative synthesis revealed a promising effect in the intensity of headaches attacks. Moreover, no significant effect was found about the effectiveness of EMG-BFB in the reduction of frequency and durations of headache attacks. Future studies with new multimodal technologic assessment and following RCT guidelines can unmask the potentiality of EMG-BFB in the treatment of headache.

Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Gamification, and Telerehabilitation: Psychological Impact on Orthopedic Patients' Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Remote virtual rehabilitation aroused growing interest in the last decades, and its role has gained importance following the recent spread of COVID19 pandemic. The advantages of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), gamification, and telerehabilitation have been demonstrated in several medical fields. In this review, we searched the literature for studies using these technologies for orthopedic rehabilitation and analyzed studies' quality, type and field of rehabilitation, patients' characteristics, and outcomes to describe the state of the art of VR, AR, gamification, and telerehabilitation for orthopedic rehabilitation. METHODS: A comprehensive search on PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Embase databases was conducted. This review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2015 and 2020 about remote virtual rehabilitations for orthopedic patients were selected. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment tool were used for quality assessment. RESULTS: 24 studies (9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 15 non-randomized studies) and 2472 patients were included. Studies mainly concern telerehabilitation (56%), and to a lesser extent VR (28%), AR (28%), and gamification (16%). Remote virtual technologies were used following knee and hip arthroplasty. The majority of included patients were between 40 and 60 years old and had a university degree. Remote virtual rehabilitation was not inferior to face-to-face therapy, and physical improvements were demonstrated by increased clinical scores. Orthopedic virtual remote rehabilitation decreased costs related to transports, hospitalizations, and readmissions. CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity of included studies prevented a meta-analysis of their results. Age and social context influence adaptability to technology, and this can modify compliance to treatment and outcomes. A good relationship between patient and physiotherapist is essential for treatment compliance and new technologies are useful to maintain clinical interactions remotely. Remote virtual technologies allow the delivery of high-quality care at reduced costs. This is a necessity given the growing demand for orthopedic rehabilitation and increasing costs related to it. Future studies need to develop specific and objective methods to evaluate the clinical quality of new technologies and definitively demonstrate advantages of VR, AR, gamification, and telerehabilitation compared to face-to face orthopedic rehabilitation.