RESUMEN
Importance: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are federally funded community health clinics that provide comprehensive care to underserved populations, making them potential opportunities to offer eye care and address unmet health care needs. Evaluating the presence of eye care services at FQHCs in Florida is important in understanding and addressing possible gaps in care for the state's large uninsured and underserved populations. Objective: To determine whether FQHCs in Florida are currently offering eye care services, where they are available, what services are being offered, and who provides them. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used a cross-sectional design conducted within 1 year (from November 2023 to February 2024). FQHCs listed in the US Health Resources and Services Administration database were contacted by telephone to inquire about the presence of eye care services. The FQHCs were located in both urban and rural areas in Florida to assess accessibility of eye care services in the state. School-based health centers and nonophthalmic specialty care health centers were excluded. A total of 437 FQHCs were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included the presence of eye care services, types of services offered, clinician type (optometrists or ophthalmologists), frequency of services, and availability of pediatric services. Results: Among 437 FQHCs contacted, only 39 (8.9%) reported offering eye care services. These services primarily included vision examinations, glasses prescriptions, and dilated eye examinations. Optometrists were the primary providers of services at all clinics, with no clinics reporting care by ophthalmologists. The frequency of services varied considerably, ranging from daily to bimonthly. Thirty-seven (94.9%) of the 39 clinics offered pediatric eye care services. Conclusions and Relevance: The low prevalence of FQHCs with eye care services and the absence of ophthalmologist-provided care highlight a gap in access to eye care for underserved populations in Florida. These findings support investigations into implementing eye care services and interventions at FQHCs that might enhance access and equity in eye care.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of combined canaloplasty and trabeculotomy with phacoemulsification for primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). METHODS: In this retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon case series, we analyzed the pre- and postoperative measurements of PACG patients who had the procedure. Adverse events were recorded. The main outcomes were mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in each quartile of the follow-up year and the number of IOP-lowering medications the patients were on by the end of each quartile compared to their baseline values. RESULTS: A total of 46 eyes from 39 PACG patients were included. The preoperative IOP and glaucoma medications taken were 19.33±6.03 mm Hg and 1.80±1.39, respectively (N=46). Postoperative IOP means (mm Hg) in the subsequent four quartiles were 14.00±3.33 (N=44), 13.44±2.83 (N=32), 14.38±2.39 (N=16), and 14.92±2.90 (N=13) (p<0.0001). The mean number of meds was 0.32±0.80, 0.22±0.42, 0.59±0.80, and 0.08±0.28 in each respective quartile (p<0.0001), while the median was 0 across all quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Combining the OMNI surgical system with phacoemulsification led to substantial reductions in mean IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications when compared to baseline measurements.