Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Econ ; 23(9): 926-931, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32462948

RESUMEN

Aim: Preeclampsia is a serious complication of pregnancy that occurs in approximately 2.3% of all pregnancies in Switzerland. The aim of this study was to determine inpatient costs based on actual services in suspected and confirmed cases of preeclampsia in two Swiss hospitals (University Hospital Basel, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital) for the year 2016.Methods: Costs for patients with suspected or diagnosed preeclampsia were determined based on the databases of the finance and controlling departments. The cases were identified according to ICD-10 codes and were divided into three main categories: (1) patients with suspected preeclampsia who were discharged without delivering; (2) patients with diagnosed preeclampsia followed by vaginal induction; (3) patients with diagnosed preeclampsia followed by cesarean delivery.Results: A total of 301 cases were included in the analysis, of which 36 (12%) were hospitalized with suspected preeclampsia and discharged after a few days without delivering. Costs for cases of suspected preeclampsia were the lowest, averaging CHF 7,159/EUR 6,658 (95% CI: CHF 5,361/EUR 4,986; CHF 8,958/EUR 8,331), followed by CHF 12,124/EUR 11,275 (95% CI: CHF 10,401/EUR 9,673; CHF 13,950/EUR 12,974) for cases of preeclampsia with vaginal delivery, and CHF 19,352/EUR 17,997 (95% CI: CHF 17,342/EUR 16,128; CHF 21,507/EUR 20,002) for preeclampsia with cesarean section. Overall medical costs were CHF 4.7 (EUR 4.4) million. In all patient groups, the actual patient costs exceeded the DRG revenue that inpatient care providers receive from payers for providing services. The budget deficit was seen in both hospitals, although the magnitude of the deficit was different.Limitation and conclusion: This is the first study to analyze costs for preeclampsia in Switzerland. It would be desirable if this cost analysis was to be performed in other hospitals in order to achieve greater representativity for Switzerland.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Preeclampsia/economía , Cesárea/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/economía , Tiempo de Internación , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Suiza
2.
Dis Markers ; 2019: 4096847, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31485276

RESUMEN

In Switzerland, 2.3% of pregnant women develop preeclampsia. Quantification of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio has shown a diagnostic value in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, in particular in ruling out preeclampsia within one week. We estimated the economic impact of implementing sFlt-1/PlGF ratio evaluation, in addition to the standard of care (SOC), for women with suspected preeclampsia from a Swiss healthcare system's perspective. A decision tree model was developed to estimate direct medical costs of diagnosis and management of a simulated cohort of Swiss pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia (median week of gestation: 32) until delivery. The model compared SOC vs. SOC plus sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, using clinical inputs from a large multicenter study (PROGNOSIS). Resource use data and unit costs were obtained from hospital records and public sources. The assumed cost for sFlt-1/PlGF evaluation was €141. Input parameters were validated by clinical experts in Switzerland. The model utilized a simulated cohort of 6084 pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia (representing 7% of all births in Switzerland in 2015, n = 86,919). In a SOC scenario, 36% of women were hospitalized, of whom 27% developed preeclampsia and remained hospitalized until birth. In a sFlt-1/PlGF test scenario, 76% of women had a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of ≤38 (2% hospitalized), 11% had a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of >38-<85 (55% hospitalized), and 13% had a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of ≥85 (65% hospitalized). Total average costs/pregnant woman (including birth) were €10,925 vs. €10,579 (sFlt-1/PlGF), and total costs were €66,469,362 vs. €64,363,060 (sFlt-1/PlGF). Implementation of sFlt-1/PlGF evaluation would potentially achieve annual savings of €2,105,064 (€346/patient), mainly due to reduction in unnecessary hospitalization. sFlt-1/PlGF evaluation appears economically promising in predicting short-term absence of preeclampsia in Swiss practice. Improved diagnostic accuracy and reduction in unnecessary hospitalization could lead to significant cost savings in the Swiss healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo , Proteínas de la Membrana/sangre , Preeclampsia/sangre , Receptor 1 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/sangre , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana/economía , Preeclampsia/economía , Embarazo , Suiza , Receptor 1 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/economía
3.
BMC Womens Health ; 19(1): 39, 2019 02 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30808368

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic iron deficiency (ID) is a disorder affecting 10-20% of menstruating women. ID is diagnosed by measuring serum ferritin, a protein helping to store iron in the body. A deeper understanding of the association between ID and its societal and economic burden is relevant for patients, physicians, health care decision makers. METHODS: An online household survey was carried out among Swiss women aged 18-50 years suffering from debilitating symptoms due to ID. The data was population-weighted for age and region. The costs of misdiagnosis and the ID-related economic burden (i.e. days of sick leave) from productivity losses on the labor market were determined and extrapolated to the Swiss population. Furthermore, the patient burden was assessed based on quality of life daily measurements. RESULTS: The total sample included 1010 women who received an ID diagnosis with a blood test in the last 2 years (mean age: 33.5 years). Most named symptoms were "being tired or exhausted" (96.4%) and reduced physical energy level (41.0%). In total, 354 (35.0% of the total sample) patients received an initial diagnosis other than ID. Of those, 46.8% were treated prior to the ID diagnosis with a pharmacological medical therapy or psychotherapy. Extrapolating these numbers to the Swiss female population aged 18-50 years, the direct medical costs would be CHF 78 million (assuming an annual ID incidence of ID diagnosis of 9.5%). On average, 28.5% of participants in the work-force had to take sick leave due to ID symptoms within a period of 2 years (mean: 5.2 days, i.e. 2.6 days/year). The estimated annual indirect costs in Switzerland would be CHF 33 million (human capital approach) or CHF 26 million (friction cost method), respectively. Being exhausted and impaired concentration appear to be the most important factors negatively impacting daily living and hence quality of life. CONCLUSION: The societal and economic burden among women due to debilitating symptoms of ID in Switzerland is substantial. Timely, correct diagnosis and treatment of ID may contribute to reducing this burden. Further studies are needed in this area to validate our results.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropénica/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Errores Diagnósticos/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Deficiencias de Hierro , Adolescente , Adulto , Anemia Ferropénica/sangre , Anemia Ferropénica/complicaciones , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Hierro/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Suiza , Adulto Joven
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 14(11): 2706-2714, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923782

RESUMEN

Seasonal influenza can have serious morbid consequences and can even result in death, particularly in at-risk populations, including healthcare professionals (HCPs), elderly and those living with a medical risk condition. Although in Europe recommendations exist for annual influenza vaccination in these populations in most countries, the vaccination coverage rate (VCR) is often well below the World Health Organization target of 75% coverage. In our previous survey in 2009 we showed that some elements of national vaccination policies, e.g. reminder systems, strong official recommendation, and easy access, seemed to contribute to achieving higher influenza VCRs among elderly. We repeated the survey in 2016, using the same methodology to assess changes in influenza VCRs among the elderly and in the impact of policy elements on these VCRs. In addition, we collected information about VCRs among HCPs, and those living with a medical risk condition. The median VCR in the 21 countries that had recommendations for influenza vaccination in the elderly was 35.3%, ranging from 1.1% in Estonia to 74.5% in Scotland. The average VCRs for HCPs and those living with medical risk conditions, available in 17 and 10 countries, respectively, were 28.3% (range 7% in Czech Republic to 59.1% in Portugal) and 32.2% (range from 20.0% in the Czech Republic and Hungary to 59.6% in Portugal), respectively. Fewer countries were able to provide data from HCP and those living with medical risk conditions. Since the initial survey during the 2007-2008 influenza season, VCRs have decreased in the elderly in the majority of countries, thus, achieving high VCRs in the elderly and the other target groups is still a major public health challenge in Europe. This could be addressed by the identification, assessment and sharing of best practice for influenza vaccination policies.


Asunto(s)
Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Preescolar , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estaciones del Año
5.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(7): 1495-1504, 2017 07 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28481678

RESUMEN

Herpes zoster (HZ) or "shingles" results from a reactivation of the varicella zoster virus (VZV) acquired during primary infection (chickenpox) and surviving in the dorsal root ganglia. In about 20% of cases, a complication occurs, known as post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). A live attenuated vaccine against VZV is available for the prevention of HZ and subsequent PHN. The present study aims to update an earlier evaluation estimating the cost-effectiveness of the HZ vaccine from a Swiss third party payer perspective. It takes into account updated vaccine prices, a different age cohort, latest clinical data and burden of illness data. A Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime consequences of vaccinating 15% of the Swiss population aged 65-79 y. Information from sentinel data, official statistics and published literature were used. Endpoints assessed were number of HZ and PHN cases, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs of hospitalizations, consultations and prescriptions. Based on a vaccine price of CHF 162, the vaccination strategy accrued additional costs of CHF 17,720,087 and gained 594 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was CHF 29,814 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were most sensitive to epidemiological inputs, utility values, discount rates, duration of vaccine efficacy, and vaccine price. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated a more than 99% chance that the ICER was below 40,000 CHF per QALY. Findings were in line with existing cost-effectiveness analyses of HZ vaccination. This updated study supports the value of an HZ vaccination strategy targeting the Swiss population aged 65-79 y.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/economía , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Neuralgia Posherpética/epidemiología , Neuralgia Posherpética/prevención & control , Anciano , Femenino , Herpes Zóster/economía , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Neuralgia Posherpética/economía , Suiza/epidemiología
7.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 33(12): 1311-24, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26334991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphataemia is common and harmful in patients receiving dialysis. Treatment options include noncalcium-based phosphate binders such as sevelamer carbonate (SC) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the health economic impact of PA21-based strategies compared with SC-based strategies, from the perspective of the Scottish National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A Markov model was constructed based on data from a randomised clinical trial comparing PA21 and SC. Model input parameters were derived from published literature, national statistics and unpublished sources. Costs (price year 2012) and effects were discounted at 3.5 %. Analysis with a lifelong time horizon yielded the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost or savings per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained or forgone. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore uncertainties around assumptions and model input parameters. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, phosphorus reductions for PA21 and SC were 1.93 and 1.95 mg/dL. Average undiscounted survival was estimated to be 7.61 years per patient in both strategies. PA21 patients accrued less QALYs (2.826) than SC patients (2.835), partially due to differential occurrence of side effects. Total costs were £ 13,119 and £ 14,728 for PA21 and SC, respectively (difference per patient of £ 1609). By using PA21 versus SC, one would save £ 174,999 (or £ 123,463 when including dialysis and transplantation costs) for one QALY forgone. A scenario modelling the nonsignificant reduction in mortality (relative risk 0.714) observed in the trial yielded an ICER for PA21 of £ 22,621 per QALY gained. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis of the base-case, PA21 was dominant in 11 %, and at least cost-effective in 53 %, of iterations, using a threshold of £ 20,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PA21 versus SC in hyperphosphataemic patients being intolerant of calcium-based phosphate binders may be cost saving and yields only very limited disadvantages in terms of quality-adjusted survival. PA21 appears to be cost-effective from the perspective of the Scottish NHS.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos Férricos/economía , Hiperfosfatemia/economía , Modelos Económicos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Diálisis Renal , Sevelamer/economía , Sacarosa/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Combinación de Medicamentos , Compuestos Férricos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Férricos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hiperfosfatemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Escocia , Sevelamer/administración & dosificación , Sevelamer/uso terapéutico , Sacarosa/administración & dosificación , Sacarosa/uso terapéutico
8.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 33(2): 179-90, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25404424

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The individual risk of recurrence in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer patients determines whether adjuvant endocrine therapy should be combined with chemotherapy. Clinicopathological parameters and molecular tests such as EndoPredict(®) (EPclin) can support decision making in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative cancer. OBJECTIVE: Using a life-long Markov state transition model, we determined the health economic impact and incremental cost effectiveness of EPclin-based risk stratification in combination with clinical guidelines [German-S3, National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN), and St. Gallen] to decide on chemotherapy use. METHODS: Information on overall and metastasis-free survival came from Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group clinical trials 6/8 (n = 1,619) and published literature. Effectiveness was assessed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs (2010) were assessed from a German third-party payer perspective. RESULTS: Lifetime costs per patient ranged from 28,268 (St.Gallen and EPclin) to 33,756 (NCCN). Due to an imperfect prognostic value and differences in chemotherapy use, strategies achieved between 13.165 QALYs (NCCN) and 13.173 QALYs (EPclin alone) per patient. Using German-S3 as reference, three strategies showed dominant results (St. Gallen and EPclin, German-S3 and EPclin, EPclin alone). Compared to German-S3, the addition of EPclin saved 3,388 and gained 0.002 QALYs per patient. Combining guidelines with EPclin remained preferable in sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that molecular markers can be sensibly combined with clinical guidelines to determine the risk profile of adjuvant breast cancer patients. Compared with the current German best practice (German-S3), combinations of EPclin with the St. Gallen, German-S3 or NCCN guideline and EPclin alone were dominant from the perspective of the German healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo
9.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 144: w13998, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25144861

RESUMEN

In no other field of biomedicine has such revolutionary change taken place in recent decades as it has in molecular genetics. The accumulated knowledge in this field will not only enable clinicians to make new treatment decisions in future, but will also help to save on healthcare costs. A positive test result will be the prerequisite for carrying out targeted drug treatment (companion diagnostics). Specific molecular diagnostics provide doctors with additional information that was not previously available, enabling them to optimise treatment accordingly. At the same time, prognostic tests mean that targeted preventive measures can be taken. Highly informative non-invasive tests will enable early detection and prevention to play a greater role. Technological breakthroughs, such as high-throughput sequencing, will lead to a flood of data in the future. The challenge lies in the quality of interpretation, which means extracting useful information for doctor and patient. Unlike data collection, interpretation is complex and expensive: it requires a high degree of expertise and a lot of resources. At the same time, experts stress that - as well as improvements in the accuracy and speed of data analysis - defined quality criteria must be generated for reliable interpretation of results. These challenges need to be tackled so that the population can benefit to the utmost from the opportunities offered by these developments: rapidly available and informative tests for targeted therapies based on high-quality data.


Asunto(s)
Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Pruebas Genéticas , Genómica , Confidencialidad , Pruebas Genéticas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Suiza
10.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 70(8): 983-90, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24858824

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Existing health technology assessment methods can be time-consuming and complicated to use in practice. EValuation of pharmaceutical Innovations with regard to Therapeutic Advantage (EVITA) is a recently developed drug assessment strategy that provides a detailed and clinically relevant evaluation of new agents compared to standard therapies. We therefore sought to use EVITA to evaluate eight novel agents recently introduced to clinical practice or in late-stage trials for the treatment of prostate cancer, metastatic melanoma, or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Eight agents (abiraterone, enzalutamide, sipuleucel-T, Prostvac, radium 223, ipilimumab, vemurafenib, and belimumab) were selected for study using the EVITA algorithm. A comprehensive literature search was performed to find clinical trial data, which were then classified using the EVITA protocol. EVITA was also compared to results from health technology assessments (HTAs) or reimbursement decisions. RESULTS: The EVITA scores for the eight drugs ranged from 5.5 to 9: all the selected agents are therefore classed as 'recommended' and are likely to produce a therapeutic advantage. In particular, vemurafenib is likely to be highly beneficial to patients with metastatic melanoma and radium 223 to patients with metastatic prostate cancer affecting the bone. The EVITA results were generally concordant with HTAs. CONCLUSIONS: All the agents show favourable EVITA scores and are therefore recommended for clinical practice. EVITA is an easy-to-use tool that provides clinical context to the assessment of newly introduced agents and can be easily used by non-specialists.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Androstenos , Androstenoles/clasificación , Androstenoles/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/clasificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/clasificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/clasificación , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/clasificación , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Ipilimumab , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Feniltiohidantoína/clasificación , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Radioisótopos/clasificación , Radioisótopos/uso terapéutico , Radio (Elemento)/clasificación , Radio (Elemento)/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Extractos de Tejidos/clasificación , Extractos de Tejidos/uso terapéutico
11.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 23(5): 926-32, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24119621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few useful empirical data on stroke are available for Switzerland. The aim of this study was to collect data on the use of medical resources and associated costs among stroke patients. Special attention was paid to possible correlations between epidemiologic indicators, sociodemographic variables, resource use, and costs. METHODS: We carried out a representative population survey of 19,123 households in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland with computer-assisted telephone interviews in 2005. Detailed sociodemographic data and information on the use of resources were collected from 509 individuals aged 15-75 years who had cared for a stroke patient in the past 1-2 years. RESULTS: In the last 1-2 years, a total of 7.8% of households were affected by stroke in the German-speaking part of Switzerland, whereas only 4.3% of households were affected in the French-speaking part of Switzerland (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89, P < .001). Based on the length of stay, the total cost of inpatient treatment and rehabilitation during the average 1-year observation period was estimated at €40,090. Stroke therefore caused approximately 2.9% of all inpatient costs in Switzerland. Patients with supplementary insurance were treated more frequently as inpatients than patients with statutory insurance (OR: 2.14, P = .014), and patients with a low household income were referred less frequently to an inpatient rehabilitation facility than those with medium or high household income (OR = .58, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms the medical and economic importance of stroke and supplements the existing European data. Further research is needed in regard to incidence differences in stroke across Switzerland. Patients without supplementary insurance or with low household income were less likely to receive inpatient treatment.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Renta , Seguro de Salud/economía , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Modelos Logísticos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Suiza/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
12.
Vaccine ; 31(27): 2862-7, 2013 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23632307

RESUMEN

Time from registration to population access to new vaccines can take considerable time in European countries. Reasons might be found in the regulatory framework, decision-making processes or the assessment of vaccines by evaluating bodies. The aim of this study was to determine whether some decision-making processes can explain between-country differences in the time to population access to new vaccination programs. Information gathered from a survey among European National Vaccine Industry Groups was combined with information from official health authorities, vaccine manufacturers and literature published. Firstly, a retrospective survey was conducted to measure access time to new vaccines against three diseases in 17 European countries. Secondly, qualitative information on the country-specific decision-making frameworks for the introduction of new "vaccination programs" was identified in a cross-sectional survey. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were used for data analysis. The median access time to new vaccines was 6.4 years (95% confidence interval: 5.7-7.1 years) post marketing authorization. National assessments underlying immunization policy decisions (recommendation phase) absorbed most of the access time. Correlation analysis suggested that processes with established timelines and clarity in regard to vaccine evaluation criteria used could ameliorate the effectiveness of the decision-making process. In order to reduce the time to access for new, beneficial vaccines, the underlying vaccination recommendation, implementation and funding process needs to be understood and optimized, where necessary.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización , Vacunas , Toma de Decisiones en la Organización , Europa (Continente) , Política de Salud , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/economía , Vacunación , Vacunas/economía
13.
PLoS One ; 7(10): e45450, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23071519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccination coverage rates for seasonal influenza are not meeting national and international targets. Here, we investigated whether the 2009/2010 A/H1N1 pandemic influenza affected the uptake of influenza vaccines. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In December 2009/January 2010 and April 2010, 500 randomly selected members of the general public in Germany, France, the United States, China, and Mexico were surveyed by telephone about vaccination for seasonal and A/H1N1 pandemic influenza. Also, in April 2010, 100 randomly selected general practitioners were surveyed. Adult vaccine coverage in December 2009/January 2010 for A/H1N1 pandemic and seasonal influenza were, respectively, 12% and 29% in France, 11% and 25% in Germany, 41% and 46% in the US, 13% and 30% in Mexico, and 12% and 10% in China. Adult uptake rates in April 2010 were higher in Mexico but similar or slightly lower in the other countries. Coverage rates in children were higher than in adults in the US, Mexico, and China but mostly lower in Germany and France. Germans and French viewed the threat of A/H1N1 pandemic influenza as low to moderate, whereas Mexicans, Americans, and Chinese viewed it as moderate to serious, opinions generally mirrored by general practitioners. The recommendation of a general practitioner was a common reason for receiving the pandemic vaccine, while not feeling at risk and concerns with vaccine safety and efficacy were common reasons for not being vaccinated. Inclusion of the A/H1N1 pandemic strain increased willingness to be vaccinated for seasonal influenza in the United States, Mexico, and China but not in Germany or France. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The 2009/2010 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic increased vaccine uptake rates for seasonal influenza in Mexico but had little effect in other countries. Accurate communication of health information, especially by general practitioners, is needed to improve vaccine coverage rates.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Médicos Generales , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , China , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Francia , Alemania , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estaciones del Año , Estados Unidos
14.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 14(7): 782-90, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22689292

RESUMEN

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of iron repletion using intravenous (i.v.) ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with iron deficiency with or without anaemia. Cost-effectiveness was studied from the perspective of the National Health Service in the UK. METHODS AND RESULTS: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis was used to compare iron repletion with FCM with no iron treatment. Using data from the FAIR-HF trial and publicly available sources and publications, per patient costs and clinical effectiveness of FCM were estimated compared with placebo. Cost assessment was based on study drug and administration costs, cost of CHF treatment, and hospital length of stay. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of FCM use was expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and sensitivity analyses were performed on the base case. The time horizon of the analysis was 24 weeks. Mean QALYs were higher in the FCM arm (difference 0.037 QALYs; bootstrap-based 95% confidence interval 0.017-0.060). The ICER of FCM compared with placebo was €4414 per QALY gained for the FAIR-HF dosing regimen. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the base case result to be robust. CONCLUSION: From the UK payers' perspective, managing iron deficiency in CHF patients using i.v. FCM was cost-effective in this analysis. The base case ICER was clearly below the threshold of €22 200-€33 300/QALY gained (£20 000-£30 000) typically used by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and proved to be robust in sensitivity analysis. Improved symptoms and better quality of life contributed to this result.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos Férricos/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Deficiencias de Hierro , Maltosa/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Compuestos Férricos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Férricos/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/patología , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Maltosa/administración & dosificación , Maltosa/economía , Maltosa/uso terapéutico , Modelos Económicos , Probabilidad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
15.
Vaccine ; 30(28): 4267-75, 2012 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22521287

RESUMEN

The 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) has been shown to be highly cost-effective. The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) offers seroprotection against six additional serotypes. A decision-analytic model was constructed to estimate direct medical costs and clinical effectiveness of PCV13 vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), pneumonia, and otitis media relative to PCV7 vaccination. The option with an one-dose catch-up vaccination in children of 15-59 months was also considered. Assuming 83% vaccination coverage and considering indirect effects, 1808 IPD, 5558 pneumonia and 74,136 otitis media cases could be eliminated from the entire population during a 10-year modelling period. The PCV13 vaccination programme would lead to additional costs (+€26.2 Mio), but saved medical costs of -€77.1 Mio due to cases averted and deaths avoided, overcompensate these costs (total cost savings -€50.9 Mio). The national immunisation programmes with PCV13 can be assumed cost saving when compared with the current vaccine PCV7 in Switzerland.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Meningitis Neumocócica/economía , Meningitis Neumocócica/epidemiología , Meningitis Neumocócica/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Otitis Media/economía , Otitis Media/epidemiología , Otitis Media/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Neumocócica/economía , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , Neumonía Neumocócica/prevención & control , Suiza/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 11: 317, 2011 Nov 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22098703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The decision whether to treat conservatively or reconstruct surgically a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is an ongoing subject of debate. The high prevalence and associated public health burden of torn ACL has led to continuous efforts to determine the best therapeutic approach. A critical evaluation of benefits and expenditures of both treatment options as in a cost effectiveness analysis seems well-suited to provide valuable information for treating physicians and healthcare policymakers. METHODS: A literature review identified four of 7410 searched articles providing sufficient outcome probabilities for the two treatment options for modeling. A transformation key based on the expert opinions of 25 orthopedic surgeons was used to derive utilities from available evidence. The cost data for both treatment strategies were based on average figures compiled by Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist and reinforced by Swiss national statistics. A decision tree was constructed to derive the cost-effectiveness of each strategy, which was then tested for robustness using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Decision tree analysis revealed a cost effectiveness of 16,038 USD/0.78 QALY for ACL reconstruction and 15,466 USD/0.66 QALY for conservative treatment, implying an incremental cost effectiveness of 4,890 USD/QALY for ACL reconstruction. Sensitivity analysis of utilities did not change the trend. CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction for reestablishment of knee stability seems cost effective in the Swiss setting based on currently available evidence. This, however, should be reinforced with randomized controlled trials comparing the two treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Rotura/cirugía , Rotura/terapia , Suiza , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Clin Cancer Res ; 17(19): 6338-46, 2011 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21807639

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Monoclonal antibodies against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as cetuximab, have led to significant clinical benefits for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients but have also increased treatment costs considerably. Recent evidence associates KRAS and BRAF mutations with resistance to EGFR antibodies. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of predictive testing for KRAS and BRAF mutations, prior to cetuximab treatment of chemorefractory mCRC patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A life-long Markov simulation model was used to estimate direct medical costs (€) and clinical effectiveness [quality-adjusted life-years (QALY)] of the following strategies: KRAS testing, KRAS testing with subsequent BRAF testing of KRAS wild-types (KRAS/BRAF), cetuximab treatment without testing. Comparison was against no cetuximab treatment (reference strategy). In the testing strategies, cetuximab treatment was initiated if no mutations were detected. Best supportive care was given to all patients. Survival times/utilities were derived from published randomized clinical trials. Costs were assessed from the perspective of the Swiss health system. RESULTS: Average remaining lifetime costs ranged from €3,983 (no cetuximab) to €38,662 (no testing). Cetuximab treatment guided by KRAS/BRAF achieved gains of 0.491 QALYs compared with the reference strategy. The KRAS testing strategy achieved an additional gain of 0.002 QALYs compared with KRAS/BRAF. KRAS/BRAF testing was the most cost-effective approach when compared with the reference strategy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: €62,653/QALY). CONCLUSION: New predictive tests for KRAS and BRAF status are currently being introduced in pathology. Despite substantial costs of predictive testing, it is economically favorable to identify patients with KRAS and BRAF wild-type status.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Análisis Mutacional de ADN/economía , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Proteínas ras/genética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Cetuximab , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Genes erbB-1 , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Cuidados Paliativos , Pronóstico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Suiza
18.
BMC Infect Dis ; 10: 279, 2010 Sep 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20860809

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The importation of malaria to non-endemic countries remains a major cause of travel-related morbidity and a leading cause of travel-related hospitalizations. Currently they are three priority medications for malaria prophylaxis to West Africa: mefloquine, atovaquone/proguanil and doxycycline. We investigate the cost effectiveness of a partial reimbursement of the cheapest effective malaria chemoprophylaxis (mefloquine) for travellers to high risk areas of malaria transmission compared with the current situation of no reimbursement. METHODS: This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis based on malaria cases imported from West Africa to Switzerland from the perspective of the Swiss health system. We used a decision tree model and made a literature research on the components of travel related malaria. The main outcome measure was the cost effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis reimbursement based on malaria and deaths averted. RESULTS: Using a program where travellers would be reimbursed for 80% of the cost of the cheapest malaria chemoprophylaxis is dominant (i.e. cost saving and more effective than the current situation) using the assumption that currently 68.7% of travellers to West Africa use malaria chemoprophylaxis. If the current usage of malaria chemoprophylaxis would be higher, 82.4%, the incremental cost per malaria case averted is € 2'302. The incremental cost of malaria death averted is € 191'833.The most important factors influencing the model were: the proportion of travellers using malaria chemoprophylaxis, the probability of contracting malaria without malaria chemoprophylaxis, the cost of the mefloquine regimen, the decrease in the number of travellers without malaria chemoprophylaxis in the reimbursement strategy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a reimbursement of 80% of the cost of the cheapest effective malaria chemoprophylaxis (mefloquine) for travellers from Switzerland to West Africa is highly effective in terms of malaria cases averted and is cost effective to the Swiss health system. These data are relevant to discussions about the cost effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis reimbursement for vulnerable groups such as those visiting friends and relatives who have the highest risk of malaria, who are least likely to use chemoprophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Quimioprevención/economía , Quimioprevención/métodos , Malaria/economía , Malaria/prevención & control , Mefloquina/administración & dosificación , Mefloquina/economía , Viaje , África Occidental , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Suiza
19.
BMC Dermatol ; 10: 4, 2010 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20579358

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact on patients suffering from chronic hand eczema (CHE) is enormous, as no licensed systemic treatment option with proven efficacy for CHE is available. Alitretinoin is a novel agent which showed high clinical efficacy in patients with severe, refractory CHE. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of alitretinoin for CHE patient treatment from a Swiss third party payer perspective. A further objective of this study was to determine the burden of disease in Switzerland. METHODS: A long-term Markov cohort simulation model was used to estimate direct medical costs (euro) and clinical effectiveness (quality adjusted life years, QALYs) of treating severe CHE patients with alitretinoin. Comparison was against the standard treatment of supportive care (optimised emollient therapy). Information on response rates were derived from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Costs were considered from the perspective of the Swiss health system. Swiss epidemiological data was derived from official Swiss Statistic institutions. RESULTS: Annual costs of alitretinoin treatment accounted for 2'212 euro. After a time horizon of 22.4 years, average remaining long-term costs accounted for 42'208 euro or 38'795 euro in the alitretinoin and the standard treatment arm, respectively. Compared with the standard therapy, the addition of alitretinoin yielded an average gain of 0.230 QALYs at the end of the simulation. Accordingly, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio resulted in 14'816 euro/QALY gained. These results were robust to changes in key model assumptions. CONCLUSION: The therapy for CHE patients is currently insufficient. In our long-term model we identified the treatment with alitretinoin as a cost-effective alternative for the therapy of CHE patients in Switzerland.


Asunto(s)
Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Eccema/fisiopatología , Tretinoina/administración & dosificación , Tretinoina/economía , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alitretinoína , Enfermedad Crónica , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Suiza , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 28(8): 629-47, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20524722

RESUMEN

Breast cancer is the leading cancer type diagnosed among women in Western countries. Despite great advances in cancer therapies, many of these patients develop non-curable metastases. The objective of cancer treatment in the metastatic setting is mainly to control symptoms and to prolong survival. The selection of the optimal chemotherapeutic regimen is affected by performance status, tumour biology, site and extent of the disease and the exposure to prior therapies. Recent developments in new kinds of cancer drugs have contributed not only to immense progress in clinical outcomes but also to dramatically increased treatment-related health costs. Cost-effectiveness analysis is a type of economic evaluation that compares costs and health outcomes of alternative intervention strategies in a systematic way. In this review, a systematic literature search was performed and the evidence on the cost effectiveness of conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer was explored. Cost-effectiveness/-utility analysis of treatment regimens for metastatic breast cancer were identified using literature and reference searches (MEDLINE). Published reports on conventional and targeted cancer therapies were scrutinized and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were abstracted. Furthermore, the quality of reporting, as well as methodological and modeling issues, were extensively discussed. From full-text article reviews, six cost-effectiveness analyses on conventional therapies and seven studies on targeted therapies were included. Eight analyses were conducted in European countries, three in the US and two in Canada. The economic models were primarily (69%) based on clinical trial data. Results from sensitivity analyses and study perspectives were reported by all studies. Discount rates were mentioned in five articles (39%). The methods of reporting costs and effects varied considerably, as did trial design across conventional chemotherapies, which made it difficult to compare those analyses. The pharmacoeconomic studies came to different conclusions. The actual clinical evidence does not suggest one conventional chemotherapy regimen as superior. Studies on cytotoxic agents showed mainly favourable cost-effectiveness ratios. Targeted therapies indicated both favourable and non-favourable ratios. Currently, trastuzumab is the only antibody-based targeted therapy that is established in the clinic for the metastatic setting.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/economía , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA