Unravelling the complex interplay of factors behind exercise limitations and physical inactivity in COPD.

Exercise limitation and physical inactivity are known treatable traits for people with COPD. Maximising exercise capacity and keeping people physically active improves health status and survival rates among people with COPD. However, managing these two treatable traits can be extremely challenging for clinicians due to the complex intersectionality of factors influencing an individual's capacity, opportunity and motivation to engage in physical activity. This review presents the complex factors influencing exercise capacity ("can do"), levels of physical activity ("do do") and sedentary behaviours amongst people with COPD and provides practical recommendations on how clinicians can address some of these factors in practice. Most importantly, it highlights the importance of referring to pulmonary rehabilitation as a way to improve exercise capacity among people with COPD.

The Association between Objectively Measured Physical Activity and the Prevalence of Comorbidities in Lung Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplant recipients are often physically inactive and are at risk of developing comorbidities. We investigated whether objectively measured physical activity was associated with the prevalence of comorbidities. METHODS: Physical activity (accelerometry) and the presence of cardiovascular disease, symptoms of depression and anxiety, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, lower extremity artery disease, muscle weakness, obesity, and osteoporosis were assessed in 108 lung transplant recipients. Patients were divided into four groups based on daily step count. RESULTS: A cohort of 108 patients (60 ± 7 years, 51% male, 20 ± 14 months since transplantation) was included. Active patients (>7,500 steps/day) had significantly fewer comorbidities (4 comorbidities) compared to severely inactive patients (<2,500 steps/day, 6 comorbidities), and muscle weakness and high symptoms of depression were less prevalent. Severely inactive patients had significantly more cardiovascular comorbidities compared to all other groups. No other significant differences were observed. CONCLUSION: Physically active lung transplant recipients have fewer comorbidities, lower prevalence of muscle weakness, and fewer symptoms of depression compared to very inactive patients.

Physical activity coaching in patients with interstitial lung diseases: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Physical activity is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and physical inactivity is related to poor health outcomes. We investigated the effect of a telecoaching intervention to improve physical activity in patients with ILD. METHODS: Eighty patients with ILD were randomized into the intervention or control group. Patients in the intervention group received a 12-week telecoaching program including a step counter, a patient-tailored smartphone application, and coaching calls. Patients in the control group received usual care. Physical activity (primary outcome), physical fitness and quality of life were measured at baseline and 12 weeks later with an accelerometer, 6-min walking test and quadriceps muscle force and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD). RESULTS: Participation in telecoaching did not improve physical activity: between-group differences for step count: 386 ± 590 steps/day, p = .52; sedentary time: 4 ± 18 min/day, p = .81; movement intensity: 0.04 ± 0.05 m/s2, p = .45). Between-group differences for the 6-min walking test, quadriceps muscle force and K-BILD were 14 ± 10 m, p = .16; 2 ± 3% predicted, p = .61; 0.8 ± 1.7 points, p = .62 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve weeks of telecoaching did not improve physical activity, physical fitness or quality of life in patients with ILD. Future physical or behavioural interventions are needed for these patients to improve physical activity.

The association of weather conditions with day-to-day variability in physical activity in patients with COPD.

Background: While patients with COPD often cite weather conditions as a reason for inactivity, little is known about the relationship between physical activity (PA) and weather conditions. The present study investigated the association of day-to-day weather changes on PA in patients with COPD and investigated patient characteristics related to being more or less influenced by weather conditions. Methods: In this longitudinal analysis, device-based day-by-day step counts were objectively measured in COPD patients for up to 12 months. Daily meteorological data (temperature, precipitation, wind speed, hours of sunlight and daylight) were linked to the daily step count and individual and multivariable relationships were investigated using mixed-model effects. Individual R2 was calculated for every subject to investigate the estimated influence of weather conditions on a patient level and its relationship with patient characteristics. Results: We included 50 patients with a mean±sd follow-up time of 282±93 days, totalling 14 117 patient-days. Daily temperature showed a positive linear pattern up until an inflexion point, after which a negative association with increasing temperature was observed (p<0.0001). Sunshine and daylight time had a positive association with PA (p<0.0001). Precipitation and wind speed were negatively associated with PA (p<0.0001). The median per-patient R2 for overall weather conditions was 0.08, ranging from 0.00 to 0.42. No strong associations between patient characteristics and per-patient R2 were observed. Conclusion: Weather conditions are partly associated with PA in patients with COPD, yet the overall explained variance of PA due to weather conditions is rather low and varied strongly between individuals.

Factors associated to physical activity in patients with COPD: An ecological approach.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is low in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Identifying modifiable and non-modifiable correlates of PA give understanding of the individual behavior and provide future directions for PA enhancing interventions. As PA is complex and multidimensional, it should be embedded within a thorough framework. OBJECTIVE: To identify correlates of PA in a comprehensive COPD population based on a broad ecological model, including physiological, psychological, socio-demographic and environmental dimensions. METHODS: PA was objectively measured using the Dynaport Movemonitor and a comprehensive data collection of physiological, psychological, socio-demographic and environmental factors were collected. Bivariable and multivariable regression analyses (including principle component analysis) were executed. RESULTS: For this cross-sectional analysis, we included 148 patients with COPD and valid PA data (mean (SD) age 68 (7) years, FEV1 57 (17) % predicted, 5613 (3596) steps per day). Significant bivariable associations were found for physiological (exercise capacity, muscle force, lung function, symptoms, comorbidities), psychological (e.g. fatigue, motivation, perceived difficulty with PA), socio-demographic (dog owning, use of activity tracker) and environmental (season, daylight, temperature) factors. Based on the multivariable regression model, exercise capacity, beliefs on motivation, importance and self-confidence regarding PA and weather conditions were independent correlates of mean steps per day (R2 = 0.35). Movement intensity during walking was only independently associated with exercise capacity and age (R2 = 0.41). CONCLUSION: Although a wide range of potential influence factors were evaluated, variance in PA was only partly explained, supporting that PA is a complex behavior which is difficult to predict.

Sustaining training effects through physical activity coaching (STEP): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs improve physical fitness, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of patients with COPD. However, improved physical activity (PA) is not guaranteed after PR and the clinical benefits fade off after PR discharge. We aimed to investigate whether a 9 months PA-telecoaching program is able to improve PA of patients with COPD, after 3 months of PR and if this leads to maintenance of PR-acquired benefits. METHODS: Patients with COPD enrolled in a 6-month PR program were randomized to a (semi-automated) PA-telecoaching program or usual care, 3 months after PR initiation. The intervention consisted of a smartphone application with individual targets and feedback (for 6 months) and self-monitoring with a step counter (for 9 months). Patients were followed up for 9 months after randomization. Primary outcome was PA (daily step count by accelerometery), secondary outcomes were exercise tolerance, quadriceps force, dyspnea and QoL. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included (mean ± SD: 65 ± 7 years, FEV1 49 ± 19%, 6MWD 506 ± 75 m, PA 5225 ± 2646 steps/day). The intervention group presented a significant improvement in steps/day at every visit compared to usual care (between-group differences mean ± SE: 1431 ± 555 steps/day at 9 months after randomization, p = 0.01). Secondary outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The semi-automated PA-telecoaching program implemented after 3 months of PR was effective to improve the amount of PA (steps/day) during PR and after follow-up. However, this was not accompanied by the maintenance of other PR-acquired benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02702791. Retrospectively registered on March 9, 2016. Start study October 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02702791?term=NCT02702791&draw=2&rank=1 .

Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in breast and colorectal cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Consumer-based activity trackers are used to measure and promote PA. We studied the accuracy of a wrist- and waist-worn activity tracker in cancer survivors and compared these results to a healthy age-matched control group. METHODS: Twenty-two cancer survivors and 35 healthy subjects wore an activity tracker at the waist and at the wrist combined with a reference activity monitor at the waist (Dynaport Movemonitor). The devices were worn for 14 consecutive days. The mean daily step count from both activity trackers was compared with the reference activity monitor to investigate accuracy and agreement (paired t-test, intraclass correlation, Bland-Altman plots). To evaluate the accuracy as a coaching tool, day-by-day differences within patients were calculated. The Kendall correlation coefficient was used to test the consistency of ranking daily steps between the activity trackers and the reference activity monitor. RESULTS: The wrist-worn wearable significantly overestimated the daily step count in the cancer group (mean ± SDΔ: + 1305 (2685) steps per day; p = 0.033) and in the healthy control group (mean ± SDΔ: + 1598 (2927) steps per day; p = 0.003). The waist-worn wearable underestimated the step count in both groups, although this was not statistically significant. As a coaching device, moderate (r = 0.642-0.670) and strong (r = 0.733-0.738) accuracy was found for the wrist- and waist-worn tracker, respectively, for detecting day-by-day variability in both populations. CONCLUSION: Our results show that wrist-worn activity trackers significantly overestimate daily step count in both cancer survivors and healthy control subjects. Based on the accuracy, in particular, the waist-worn activity tracker could possibly be used as a coaching tool.

Validation of Commercial Activity Trackers in Everyday Life of People with Parkinson's Disease.

Maintaining physical activity is an important clinical goal for people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). We investigated the validity of two commercial activity trackers (ATs) to measure daily step counts. We compared a wrist- and a hip-worn commercial AT against the research-grade Dynaport Movemonitor (DAM) during 14 days of daily use. Criterion validity was assessed in 28 PwPD and 30 healthy controls (HCs) by a 2 × 3 ANOVA and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1). The ability to measure daily step fluctuations compared to the DAM was studied by a 2 × 3 ANOVA and Kendall correlations. We also explored compliance and user-friendliness. Both the ATs and the DAM measured significantly fewer steps/day in PwPD compared to HCs (p < 0.01). Step counts derived from the ATs showed good to excellent agreement with the DAM in both groups (ICC2,1 > 0.83). Daily fluctuations were detected adequately by the ATs, showing moderate associations with DAM-rankings. While compliance was high overall, 22% of PwPD were disinclined to use the ATs after the study. Overall, we conclude that the ATs had sufficient agreement with the DAM for the purpose of promoting physical activity in mildly affected PwPD. However, further validation is needed before clinical use can be widely recommended.

Physical activity pattern of patients with interstitial lung disease compared to patients with COPD: A propensity-matched study.

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is reduced in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Evidence about the PA pattern of patients with ILD is scarce. If PA of patients with ILD would be comparable to COPD, it is tempting to speculate that existing interventions focusing on enhancing PA could be as effective in ILD as already shown in COPD. Therefore, we aimed to compare PA and the correlates with PA in matched patients with ILD, COPD, and healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with ILD (n = 45), COPD (n = 45) and healthy subjects (n = 30) were propensity matched. PA level, pattern, and PA correlations with lung function and physical performance (6-minute walking distance and quadriceps force) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Daily number of steps was similar in both patient groups (mean±SE: 5631±459 for ILD, 5544±547 for COPD, p = 0.900), but significantly lower compared to healthy subjects (10031±536, p<0.001 for both). Mean intensity of PA tended to be lower in the ILD group (mean±SE metabolic equivalents of task per day: 1.41±0.04) compared to COPD (1.52±0.05, p = 0.074) and healthy individuals (1.67±0.04, p<0.001). The pattern of PA over one day was found to be similar between the three groups. Lastly, the correlation between PA and 6-minute walking distance was significantly weaker in patients with ILD compared to patients with COPD (respectively r = 0.348 and r = 0.739; p<0.05 for both). CONCLUSIONS: For a given functional reserve, patients with ILD perform an equal amount of steps but perform PA at lower intensity compared to patients with COPD. Both groups are less active compared to healthy control subjects. Functional exercise capacity was shown to be only moderately related to PA. This can potentially influence the effectiveness of PA interventions that can be expected.

The impact of endoscopic lung volume reduction on physical activity coaching in patients with severe emphysema.

Introduction: Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) aims to improve pulmonary function in severe emphysema. Physical activity (PA) coaching is expected to improve daily life PA. When improving ventilatory constrains in severe COPD, a better response to PA coaching is expected. The present study investigated the impact of PA coaching in addition to ELVR in severe emphysema. Methods: Patients allocated, based on fissure integrity, in the ELVR or no-ELVR cohort, received the PA coaching intervention with a step counter and smartphone application from 3 to 6 months follow-up. The primary end-point of this research question was the change in daily step count from baseline to 6 months follow-up compared between the ELVR and no-ELVR cohort. The secondary end-points were time spent in moderate to vigorous PA, movement intensity and patient-reported experience with PA between ELVR and no-ELVR. Results: At 6 months, PA in both ELVR+coaching (1479±460 steps·day-1; p=0.001) and no-ELVR+coaching (1910±663 steps·day-1; p=0.004) improved within group, without significant between-group differences (-405±781 steps·day-1; p=0.60). Patients in the ELVR group tended to experience less difficulty with PA compared to no-ELVR+coaching (7±4 points, p=0.08). Conclusion: We found that PA coaching is feasible and can help to enhance PA in patients with severe emphysema. Improving the ventilatory capacity through ELVR is not a prerequisite for a successful coaching intervention to increase objectively measured PA, although it alleviates patients' experienced difficulty with PA in those with severe COPD.

Lung volume reduction in emphysema: a pragmatic prospective cohort study.

Limited guidance exists for the implementation of lung volume reduction interventions in routine clinical care. We designed a pragmatic study to evaluate a strategy including endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) in heterogeneous emphysema. This prospective monocentre cohort study evaluated ELVR versus no-ELVR, followed by a cohort study evaluating LVRS. Primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) improvement of ⩾100 mL at 3-month follow-up. Changes in FEV1, residual volume (RV), 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)) were evaluated at 6-month follow-up. Hospital stay and treatment-related serious adverse events were monitored. From 106 subjects screened, 38 subjects were enrolled comparing ELVR (n=20) with no-ELVR (n=18). After 6 months' follow-up, eligible patients were referred for LVRS (n=16) with another 6-month follow-up. At 3-month follow-up, 70% of ELVR compared to 11% of no-ELVR (p<0.001) and 69% of LVRS had an FEV1 improvement of ⩾100 mL. Between-group differences (mean±sem) for ELVR versus no-ELVR at 6-month follow-up were FEV1 +0.21±0.05 L; RV -0.95±0.21 L; 6MWD 58±17 m and SGRQ -18±5 points. At 6-month follow-up, within-group differences (mean±sem) for LVRS showed FEV1 +0.27±0.06 L; RV -1.49±0.22 L and 6MWD +75±18 m. Serious adverse events in 81% versus 45% of subjects (p=0.04) and a median hospital stay of 15 versus 5 days (p<0.001) were observed for LVRS versus ELVR, respectively. This pragmatic prospective cohort study supports a clinical approach with ELVR as a less invasive first option and LVRS as powerful alternative in severe heterogeneous emphysema.

Can COPD Exacerbations Be Picked Up Early via a Weekly Medication Question Through a Smartphone Application?

Background: Exacerbations affect the disease trajectory of patients with COPD and result in an acute drop of functional status and physical activity. Timely detection of exacerbations by non-medical healthcare professionals is needed to counteract this decline. The use of digital health applications in patient interaction allows embedded detection of exacerbations. However, it is unknown if this is an effective way to pick up exacerbations. Method: We investigated the detection of exacerbations in patients with COPD enrolled in a physical activity coaching program, by prompting a weekly question on changes in medication via the smartphone application. Data on response rate and occurrence of exacerbations were collected. Results: Response rate to the medication question, evaluated in 42 patients, was 72% (n = 497). A change in medication was reported through the smartphone application in 38 (7.6%) of the answered questions. The response rate was significantly lower at 6 months follow-up compared to the first month (p =0.03). When evaluating the occurrence of adverse events in a subset of patients who completed 6 months of follow-up (n = 27), 18 exacerbations were registered in eight patients, of which 10 of these exacerbations (56%) were picked up by the medication question in the coaching application. Conclusion: Electronic interaction through a weekly medication question, embedded in a smartphone application, is feasible to support the detection of the occurrence of COPD exacerbations and can be used complementary to regular forms of detecting exacerbations. Compliance and smartphone literacy should be optimized when further using this method to report on COPD exacerbations.

Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Consumer-based activity trackers are used to measure and improve physical activity. However, the accuracy of these devices as clinical endpoint or coaching tool is unclear. We investigated the use of two activity trackers as measuring and coaching tool in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and healthy age-matched controls. METHODS: Daily steps were measured by two consumer-based activity trackers (Fitbit Zip, worn at the hip and Fitbit Alta, worn at the wrist) and a validated activity monitor (Dynaport Movemonitor) in 28 patients with COPD and 14 healthy age-matched controls for 14 consecutive days. To investigate the accuracy of the activity trackers as a clinical endpoint, mean step count per patient were compared with the reference activity monitor and agreement was investigated by Bland-Altman plots. To evaluate the accuracy of activity trackers as coaching tool, day-by-day differences within patients were calculated for all three devices. Additionally, consistency of ranking daily steps between the activity trackers and accelerometer was investigated by Kendall correlation coefficient. RESULTS: As a measuring tool, the hip worn activity tracker significantly underestimates daily step count in patients with COPD as compared to DAM (mean±SD Δ-1112±872 steps/day; p<0.0001). This underestimation is less prominent in healthy subjects (p = 0.21). The wrist worn activity tracker showed a non-significant overestimation of step count (p = 0.13) in patients with COPD, and a significant overestimation of daily steps in healthy controls (mean±SD Δ+1907±2147 steps/day; p = 0.006). As a coaching tool, both hip and wrist worn activity tracker were able to pick up the day-by-day variability as measured by Dynaport (consistency of ranking resp. r = 0.80; r = 0.68 in COPD). CONCLUSION: Although the accuracy of hip worn consumer-based activity trackers in patients with COPD and wrist worn activity trackers in healthy subjects as clinical endpoints is unsatisfactory, these devices are valid to use as a coaching tool.

European Respiratory Society International Congress 2020: highlights from best-abstract awardees.

#ERSCongress 2020 best-abstract awardees summarise their virtual European Respiratory Society International Congress experience and views on the evolving field of research for their respective assembly https://bit.ly/3kJ9JrJ.

Strategies to Increase Physical Activity in Chronic Respiratory Diseases.

Physical activity is important to maintain health. Patients who reduce their physical activity are at increased risk of developing comorbidities and faster decline in health. Interventions to enhance physical activity require a behavior change from patients and these interventions have become increasingly popular in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, few interventions have shown long-term effects and all focused on enhancing physical activity rather than the maintenance thereof. In patients with very low exercise tolerance or with significant symptom burden, enhancing physical activity be difficult and interventions should first focus on enhancing exercise tolerance.

The past, present and future of pulmonary rehabilitation.

Abundant evidence supports the use of pulmonary rehabilitation as a treatment for stable and exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Several questions around the science base of rehabilitation in other patient groups as well as the role of rehabilitation as a component in other comprehensive care trajectories remain to be addressed. The impact of a rehabilitation programme could also perhaps be enhanced if clear guidance would be available on how to individualize the components of a rehabilitation programme in individual patients. The rehabilitation community, in an attempt to increase access to programmes, has developed less rigorous interventions. These may serve specific patients (e.g. less severe patients or may be used as a maintenance programme), but in order to have conceptual clarity they should not be called substitutes for rehabilitation if they do not meet the definition of rehabilitation. Reaching clarity on the best format for maintenance programmes in order to achieve long-lasting health benefits for patients is another challenge. Furthermore, as many patients as possible should be referred to adequate rehabilitation programmes within their reach with fair reimbursement. Programmes should take into account the burden of the disease of a patient, the required components to tackle the problems, adequate assessment to document the outcome and the patient's preference. In summary, pulmonary rehabilitation is one of the most potent evidence-based therapies for patients with respiratory diseases. Researchers should continue to fine tune the interventions, get clarity on terminology as well as the ultimate outcomes for rehabilitation to ensure sustainable health effects.

The role of physical activity in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation.

Pulmonary rehabilitation is an important treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although this intervention leads to large and clinically meaningful improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life, the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on physical activity is controversial. Physical activity is lower in patients with COPD as compared to healthy age-matched controls and it is related to important health outcomes (e.g. increased risk of mortality and hospitalization). It is an important goal for rehabilitation programs to enhance physical activity to more normal levels in order to achieve the ultimate goal of rehabilitation 'to improve adherence to health enhancing behaviors'. This review discusses the role of physical activity in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation and possible ways to embed interventions geared to behavior change (i.e. to enhance physical activity) and exercise training (i.e. to enhance physical fitness) into comprehensive rehabilitation programs for patients with COPD.