Significant improvement in triglyceride levels after switching from ritonavir to cobicistat in suppressed HIV-1-infected subjects with dyslipidaemia.

OBJECTIVES: Cobicistat seems to have a low rate of adverse events compared with ritonavir. METHODS: This restrospective observational study to evaluated changes in lipid parameters and the percentage of subjects with dyslipidemia in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients who were receiving a regimen containing darunavir/ritonavir and were then switched from ritonavir to cobicistat, carried out from December 2015 to May 2016, included 299 HIV-1-infected patients who were on stable antiretroviral treatment including darunavir/ritonavir (monotherapy, bitherapy or triple therapy for at least 6 months) and were then switched from ritonavir to cobicistat. Lipid parameters, as well as plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell counts, were recorded at baseline just before the switch, and 24 weeks after the switch. Patients were stratified according to the presence of hypercholesterolaemia [baseline total cholesterol > 200 mg/dL and/or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > 130 mg/dL] or hypertriglyceridaemia (baseline triglyceride levels > 200 mg/dL). RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Fifty-two per cent of the total study population showed dyslipidaemia at baseline. All patients maintained HIV-1 RNA ≤ 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 24. No statistically significant changes were seen in CD4 T-cell count from baseline to week 24 [654 (298) to 643 (313) cells/µL; P = 0.173]. When patients were stratified according to the presence of hypercholesterolaemia at baseline (n = 124), significant changes were observed in total cholesterol (P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (P = 0.047), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P = 0.002) and triglyceride levels (P = 0.025), and when they were stratified according to the presence of hypertriglyceridaemia at baseline (n = 64), changes from baseline to week 24 in triglyceride level were statistically significant [median (interquartile range) 352 (223, 389) mg/dL at baseline and 229 (131, 279) mg/dL at week 24; P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Cobicistat as a booster of darunavir in HIV-infected subjects had a beneficial effect on the lipid profile in patients with hypercholesterolaemia or hypertrigliceridaemia at baseline.

Variable endothelial cell function restoration after initiation of two antiretroviral regimens in HIV-infected individuals.

Background: The effect of ART on endothelial cell function is incompletely characterized. Methods: We performed a 24 week prospective, case-control and comparative pilot study of ART-naive HIV-infected patients who started a darunavir- or rilpivirine-based regimen, matched with non-HIV-infected volunteers, to compare changes at week 24 from baseline in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and circulating angiogenic cells, as well as changes in immune-activation markers. Results: The study population comprised 24 HIV-infected patients and 24 non-infected volunteers. Both HIV groups completely suppressed viraemia. HIV-infected patients had higher levels of activation markers than the control group in CD8 T cells at baseline; these decreased after 24 weeks of treatment, but without reaching the levels of the control group. No statistical differences in immune activation were seen between the darunavir and rilpivirine groups. Levels of CECs were higher and levels of EPCs and circulating angiogenic cells were lower in HIV-infected patients than in the control group, although these parameters were similar between the darunavir group and the control group, but not the rilpivirine group, at week 24. An unfavourable association was observed between rilpivirine, age and increased number of CECs. Conclusions: Restoration of circulating levels of EPCs and CECs in darunavir-treated patients was greater than in those treated with rilpivirine, suggesting ongoing endothelial repair mechanisms.

Comparison of two different strategies of treatment with zoledronate in HIV-infected patients with low bone mineral density: single dose versus two doses in 2 years.

OBJECTIVES: Given the need for easily managed treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of zoledronate, by comparing three groups of patients: those with annual administration, those with biennial administration (one dose in 2 years) and a control group with no administration of zoledronate. METHODS: We randomized (2:1) 31 patients on antiretroviral therapy with low bone mineral density (BMD) to zoledronate (5 mg administered intravenously; 21 patients) plus diet counselling and to a control group (diet counselling; 10 patients). At week 48, patients treated with zoledronate were randomized again to receive a second dose (two-dose group; n = 12) or to continue with diet counselling only (single-dose group; n = 9). Changes in lumbar spine and hip BMD and bone turnover markers were compared. RESULTS: The median percentage change from baseline to week 96 in L1-L4 BMD was -1.74% [interquartile range (IQR) -2.56, 3.60%], 7.90% (IQR 4.20, 16.57%) and 5.22% (IQR 2.02, 7.28%) in the control, two-dose and single-dose groups, respectively (P < 0.01, control vs. two doses; P = 0.02, control vs. single dose; P = 0.18, two doses vs. single dose). Hip BMD changed by a median of 2.12% (IQR -0.12, 3.08%), 5.16% (IQR 3.06, 6.74%) and 4.47% (IQR 1, 5.58%), respectively (P = 0.04, control vs. two doses; P = 0.34, two doses vs. single dose). No differences between the two-dose and single-dose groups were detected in bone markers at week 96. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits for BMD of a single dose of zoledronate in 2 years may be comparable to those obtained with two doses of the drug after 96 weeks, although this study is insufficiently powered to exclude a real difference. Future studies should explore whether biennial administration of zoledronate is a useful alternative in the treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients.

Targeting only reverse transcriptase with zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir plus tenofovir in HIV-1-infected patients with multidrug-resistant virus: a multicentre pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, immunological outcome and HIV-1 evolution in the reverse transcriptase (RT) in patients with multidrug resistance receiving zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir (TZV) plus tenofovir (TDF). METHODS: Pilot analysis of highly experienced patients (n=28), with > or =1 thymidine-associated mutation (TAM) and the M184V mutation. RESULTS: Median of 8.5 treatment regimens, 58% Centers for Disease Control stage C. Baseline (nadir) CD4 count 363 (112) cells/microL. There was a sustained 24-week drop in viral load (VL) of 0.71 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (P<0.001), with 35.7% (10/28) achieving a VL of <50 copies/mL. The median 24-week decrease in CD4 was -53 cells/microL and only-17 cells/microL when baseline CD4 was <350 cells/microL. There was no evolution in RT mutations, TAMs, accessory mutations or K65R. No clinical progression and one out of 28 suspected abacavir Hypersensitivity Reaction (HSR). Lower probability of achieving VL<400 copies/mL was associated with D67N (P=0.007), D67N/M41L (P=0.01), > or =3 TAMs (P=0.07) and VL>10 000 copies/mL (P=0.01). Mutations conferring zidovudine hypersusceptibility (Y181C, K65R and L74V) did not improve virological or immunological outcomes. Better CD4 outcomes were seen in patients without M41L (P=0.04) or with baseline VL<10,000 copies/mL (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A bridging regimen with TZV+TDF prevents significant immunological decline and may forestall viral evolution in HIV-1 RT despite persistent viral replication.

Transient treatment exclusively containing nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors in highly antiretroviral-experienced patients preserves viral benefit when a fully active therapy was initiated.

BACKGROUND: We determined whether coformulated zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir plus tenofovir could maintain immune status in comparison with a genotype-guided salvage regimen in highly pretreated patients. METHOD: This was a randomized pilot control-arm study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained their CD4+ T-cell count at Week 48. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were randomized to the study arm and 10 to the control arm. At 48 weeks, 8 (64%) patients in the study arm and 10 (100%) in the control arm maintained their immune status (p = .09). No new AIDS-defining events occurred. Three patients (27%) in the study arm and 5 (50%) in the control arm achieved an undetectable viral load (p = .39). When a fully suppressive regimen was initiated, 69% of patients in the study arm (9 patients) and 60% (6 patients) in the control arm reached <50 copies at 96 weeks (p = .98). CONCLUSION: Although no statistically significant differences in immunological course were observed between the arms, the control group achieved better results after 48 weeks. This transient therapy could be reserved for specific patients in whom the risk of incomplete adherence or toxicity compromises efficacy while they are awaiting a fully active drug, without jeopardizing viral efficacy when a fully suppressive regimen is initiated.

Antiretroviral treatment simplification with nevirapine in protease inhibitor-experienced patients with hiv-associated lipodystrophy: 1-year prospective follow-up of a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Simpler and less toxic antiretroviral strategies are needed to maximize treatment compliance without sacrificing potency, at least for drug-experienced HIV-infected patients currently on regimens containing protease inhibitors (PIs). Small nonrandomized studies have suggested a beneficial role of PI-sparing regimens on lipodystrophy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the virologic, immunologic, and clinical benefit of switching the PI to nevirapine in patients with HIV-associated lipodystrophy and sustained viral suppression before entry in the study. DESIGN: Open-labeled, prospective, randomized, multicenter study. SETTING: Seven reference inpatient centers for HIV/AIDS in Spain. PATIENTS: One hundred six HIV-infected adults with clinically evident lipodystrophy who sustained HIV-RNA suppression for at least 6 months with PI-containing antiretroviral combinations. INTERVENTION: Replacement of the PI with nevirapine during 48 weeks (Group A) versus continuing the prior PI (Group B). MEASUREMENTS: Several virologic and immunologic analyses, standard and specific biochemical tests, and anthropometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements. RESULTS: At week 48, an HIV-1 RNA level <400 copies/ml was maintained in 79% and 77% of patients in Groups A and B, respectively, whereas 74% and 72% of patients had viral load levels <50 copies/ml. Absolute CD4+ counts significantly increased in both groups compared with baseline values, and a significant decrease in CD38+CD8+ cells was observed in Group A (p <.01) but not in group B. Overall, no significant changes in anthropometric or body shape measurements were found after 48 weeks. Fasting total cholesterol and triglyceride levels decreased in Group A (but not in Group B) compared with baseline values (p <.05), although no significant differences were seen between groups at the end of the study. Subjects in Group A reported a better quality of life (QOL) index than controls (p <.001), with the main reason reported being the greater simplicity of the new drug regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Protease inhibitor-sparing regimens, including nevirapine, seem to be an effective alternative for PI-experienced patients. Nevirapine-based triple therapies allow maintained control of HIV-1 RNA levels and improve the immunologic response at 48 weeks of follow-up in patients with prior sustained virologic suppression. The switch to nevirapine significantly improved the lipidic profile in Group A, although there were no differences between groups at the end of the study. Additionally, no significant changes were seen in terms of lipodystrophy-related body shape changes 1 year after the PI substitution. Finally, nevirapine-containing regimens have a simpler dosing schedule, and this facilitates high adherence and improves QOL.

Prospective randomized two-Arm controlled study to determine the efficacy of a specific intervention to improve long-term adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Nearly perfect compliance seems to be indispensable to obtain the maximum benefit from highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Interventions to ensure a high level of adherence during a relatively long-term period of therapy are necessary. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, two-arm controlled study including patients starting their first-or second-line HAART who were randomized to receive psychoeducative intervention to implement adherence (experimental group [EG]) or a usual medical follow-up (control group [CG]). We aimed to study the efficacy of a psychoeducative intervention to ensure long-term adherence to HAART, its relation with the virologic efficacy of treatment, and to determine the variables related to long-term adherence. Visits were made at weeks 0, 4, 24, and 48 for data collection. Self-reported adherence was registered at each visit and its veracity was tested by randomized blood analyses performed without previous warning to 40% of patients. Appropriate adherence was defined as the consumption of >/=95% of medication prescribed. Statistical analyses were performed both by the as treated (AT) and the intention to treat missing = failure (ITT) methods. RESULTS: In all, 116 patients were included. At week 48, 94% of patients in the EG versus 69% controls achieved adherence >/=95% (p =.008); 89% of patients in the EG versus 66% controls had HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/ml (p =.026). Overall, 85% of patients with adherence >/=95% but only 45% of those with adherence <95% had viral load (VL) <400 copies/ml (p =. 008). In multivariate analysis, variables significantly related to adherence were having received a psychoeducative intervention (odds ratio [OR], 6.58; p =.04), poor effort to take medication (OR, 5.38; p =.03), and high self-perceived capacity to follow the regimen (OR, 13.76; p =.04). Self-reported adherence and drug plasma levels coincided in 93% of cases. However, differences in adherence did not reach statistical significance in the ITT analysis although a clear tendency toward benefit was observed in EG. CONCLUSIONS: Specific and maintained psychoeducative interventions based on excellence on clinical practice are useful to keep high levels of adherence as well as high levels of viral suppression. There is a clear relation between high adherence levels and virologic success. Assessment of certain specific variables related to adherence may be helpful to monitor patient's compliance in the clinical setting.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance among patients failing a nevirapine plus protease inhibitor-containing regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of nevirapine resistance in patients failing a nevirapine plus protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen, and whether these isolates remain susceptible to other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI). DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cohort study in two tertiary university hospitals. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight HIV-infected, NNRTI-naive patients receiving nevirapine plus PI as a rescue regimen after PI treatment failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Genotypic and phenotypic resistance data at inclusion (73 and 60 plasma samples, respectively) and after 24 weeks (53 and 42 samples). RESULTS: Baseline phenotypic susceptibility to nevirapine was found in 70% of patients, and similar data were observed for efavirenz (91%) and delavirdine (71%). NNRTI resistance-associated mutations were found in 11 patients (12.5%). At 24 weeks, resistant isolates to nevirapine were found in 92% of patients, and correlated with similar resistance to efavirenz (68%) and delavirdine (73%). In the genotypic analysis, the Y181 C mutation was observed in 76% of mutants, and the most common changes were a combination of mutations at positions Y181C/K103N (23%) and the single mutation Y181C (15%). The development of nevirapine resistance was associated with baseline resistance to PI included in the regimen (P= 0.01). For isolates containing the single amino acid substitution Y181C, 29% remained fully susceptible to efavirenz, whereas 14% showed intermediate resistance to efavirenz and delavirdine. CONCLUSION: The failure of a nevirapine plus PI-containing regimen is associated with nevirapine resistance in most patients, with the most common mutation occurring at amino acid residue 181. Although there is a high degree of cross-resistance among NNRTI, nearly one third of resistant isolates carrying the single Y181C mutation remain susceptible to efavirenz.

High-dose saquinavir plus ritonavir: long-term efficacy in HIV-positive protease inhibitor-experienced patients and predictors of virologic response.

The year-long antiviral efficacy of a high-dose salvage regimen consisting of saquinavir (800 mg twice daily) plus ritonavir (400 mg twice daily) was evaluated in 58 HIV-positive patients who had seen no improvement under first-line protease inhibitor-containing regimens, nor in baseline predictors of virologic response. The efficacy of therapy was determined by CD4+/CD8+ and HIV-1 RNA values. The primary endpoint of our study was the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels <200 copies/ml (virologic success) at 6 and 12 months of of follow-up. Secondary endpoints were log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ increases through follow-up. Surrogate markers related with a lower HIV-1 RNA area under the curve were identified at baseline. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to identify baseline predictors of achieving viral suppression at <200 copies/ml. All analyses were intention to treat-last observation carried forward. Patients achieved a median HIV-1 RNA level reduction of >0.5 log through 1 year (-0.59 log10 at 12 months), as well as CD4+ counts increased significantly (89 cells/mm3 at 12 months). Overall, 53% of patients were likely to achieve HIV-1 RNA levels <200 copies/ml at 6 months. Seventy-six percent of patients who started therapy at HIV-1 RNA levels <5000 copies/ml but only 42% with baseline viral load of 5000 to 30,000 copies/ml and 18.7% with baseline viral load >30,000 copies/ml were likely to achieve viral suppression at 6 months (p < .001, log-rank test). Patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA levels between 5000 and 30,000 copies/ml (relative hazard [RH], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.98; p = .0396) and patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA levels >30,000 copies/ml (RH, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.61; p = .0040) were less likely to reach undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels than those with baseline HIV-1 RNA levels <5000 copies/ml. Salvage highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) strategies including saquinavir (SQV) at high doses plus ritonavir (RTV) exert a significant long-term efficacy in more than half of PI-experienced patients without significant additional toxicity. This therapeutic efficacy is strongly implemented by a switch at the lower HIV-1 RNA levels.

Benefit of switching from a protease inhibitor (PI) to nevirapine in PI-experienced patients suffering acquired HIV-related lipodystrophy syndrome (AHL): interim analysis at 3 months of follow-up.

This multicentre, randomized, open-label, prospective trial is evaluating the effects of switching treatment from a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen to one containing the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with durable viral suppression but suffering from lipodystrophy. Objectives of this ongoing study are to evaluate the effects of this switch on changes in body shape and metabolic abnormalities associated with acquired HIV-related lipodystrophy syndrome (AHL), as well as on maintenance of viral suppression and immunological and psychological effects. Preliminary data involving 57 patients with 3 months of follow-up show an initial improvement of AHL in two regions, the face and arms. There is also a tendency toward improved cholesterol and triglyceride levels and improved quality of life among patients receiving the nevirapine-containing regimen. Maintenance of viral suppression was equivalent in both treatment groups. Additional data with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

Efficacy of adding indinavir to previous reverse transcriptase nucleoside analogues in relation to genotypic and phenotypic resistance development in advanced HIV-1-infected patients.

We assessed the efficacy of adding indinavir in patients with advanced HIV-1 infection, who were previously exposed to different reverse transcriptase (RT) nucleoside analogues. Twenty-five patients with an initial median CD4 cell count of 20 cells/mm3 (range, 0-80 cells/mm3) were treated with indinavir (800 mg three times per day) for 24 weeks. The median initial viral load was 5.4 log (range, 3.6-6.7 log). Of these patients, 56% (14 of 25) had an initial decrease in viral load of >1 log and sustained response of >0.5 log of HIV-1 RNA from baseline. Twelve of these 14 responder patients (85%) showed a sustained RNA response undetectable by NASBA assay, and no genotypic changes in protease were detected at week 24. In those with a temporary or absent response to indinavir, either resistant viruses or lack of compliance was observed. In compliant patients (15 of 16), relatively small increases in 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) to indinavir and only two to three amino acid changes were sufficient to produce treatment failure. Phenotypic drug-resistant assays at 24 weeks revealed cross-resistance to ritonavir in all the patient isolates and to saquinavir in one third of the isolates. We observed an initial and persistent response to the addition of indinavir in patients with advanced disease and prolonged antiretroviral treatment. Therapy failure, as defined by increases in viral RNA, was associated with either lack of compliance or the development of low level indinavir-resistant virus. Clinical studies need to be designed to determine to what extent these viruses may respond to other protease inhibitors.

Long-lasting remission of cytomegalovirus retinitis without maintenance therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Seven AIDS patients who were receiving suppressive therapy for previously diagnosed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis were offered treatment with protease inhibitors (PIs). Secondary prophylaxis for CMV was discontinued after 3 months of therapy with PIs if patients had >150 CD4 cells/mm3 and a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) load of <200 copies/mL and if they were negative for CMV as determined by qualitative CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Ophthalmologic exams were done periodically. After a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 9-12), no new episodes of CMV retinitis were observed. CD4 cell counts were >150 cells/mm3 in all cases, HIV loads were <200 copies/mL, and results for qualitative CMV PCRs remained negative. These observations suggest that for selected patients with healed CMV retinitis who have immunologic and virologic evidence of a clinical response to potent combination antiretroviral therapy, temporary discontinuation of a chronic anti-CMV suppressive therapy may not result in further retinal necrosis. However, the long-term immunologic benefit of PIs and hence the safety of prolonged withdrawal of anti-CMV therapy is unknown.