Endovascular Ablation of the Greater Splanchnic Nerve in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The REBALANCE-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Greater splanchnic nerve ablation may improve hemodynamics in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Objective: To explore the feasibility and safety of endovascular right-sided splanchnic nerve ablation for volume management (SAVM). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a phase 2, double-blind, 1:1, sham-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 centers in the US and 1 center in the Republic of Georgia. Patients with HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, and invasively measured peak exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of 25 mm Hg or greater were included. Study data were analyzed from May 2023 to June 2024. Intervention: SAVM vs sham control procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was a reduction in legs-up and exercise PCWP at 1 month. The primary safety end point was serious device- or procedure-related adverse events at 1 month. Secondary efficacy end points included HF hospitalizations, changes in exercise function and health status through 12 months, and baseline to 1-month change in resting, legs-up, and 20-W exercise PCWP. Results: A total of 90 patients (median [range] age, 71 [47-90] years; 58 female [64.4%]) were randomized at 15 centers (44 SAVM vs 46 sham). There were no differences in adverse events between groups. The primary efficacy end point did not differ between SAVM or sham (mean between-group difference in PCWP, -0.03 mm Hg; 95% CI, -2.5 to 2.5 mm Hg; P = .95). There were also no differences in the secondary efficacy end points. There was no difference in the primary safety end point between the treatment (6.8% [3 of 44]) and sham (2.2% [1 of 46]) groups (difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, -6.1% to 15.4%; P = .36). There was no difference in the incidence of orthostatic hypotension between the treatment (11.4% [5 of 44]) and sham (6.5% [3 of 46]) groups (difference, 4.9%; 95% CI, -9.2% to 18.8%; P = .48). Conclusions and Relevance: Results show that SAVM was safe and technically feasible, but it did not reduce exercise PCWP at 1 month or improve clinical outcomes at 12 months in a broad population of patients with HFpEF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04592445.

Functional Capacity Assessment in Adults After Fontan Palliation: A Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test-Invasive Exercise Hemodynamics Correlation Study.

Although cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters have known prognostic value in adults after Fontan palliation, there are limited data correlating treadmill CPET with invasive exercise hemodynamics. Furthermore, the invasive hemodynamic underpinnings of exercise limitations have not been thoroughly investigated. This is retrospective analysis of 55 adults (≥18 years) after Fontan palliation who underwent treadmill CPET before invasive exercise hemodynamic testing by way of supine cycle protocol between November 2018 and April 2023. The median age was 32.2 (24.1 to 37.2) years. The peak heart rate (HR) was 139.7 ± 28.1 beats per minute and the peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was 19.1 ± 5.7 ml/kg/min (47.4 ± 13.5% predicted). VO2/HR was directly related to exercise stroke volume index (r = 0.50, p = 0.0002), whereas no association was seen with exercise arterio-mixed venous O2 content difference (r = 0.14, p = 0.32). Peak HR was inversely related to exercise pulmonary artery (PA) pressures (r = -0 61, p <0.0001) and PA wedge pressures (PAWP) (r = -0.61, p <0.0001). Moreover, %predicted VO2 was inversely related to exercise PA pressures (r = -0.50, p <0.0001) and PAWP (r = -0.55, p <0.0001). Peak VO2 ≤19.1 ml/kg/min had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 76% (area under the curve = 0.82) for predicting a ΔPAWP/ΔQs ratio >2 mm Hg/L/min and/or a ΔPA:ΔQp >3 mm Hg/L/min, whereas a predicted peak VO2 ≤48% had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 81% (area under the curve = 0.79) for the same parameters. In summary, lower peak HR and peak VO2 were associated with higher exercise PAWP and PA pressure. Peak VO2 ≤48% predicted provided the optimal cutoff for predicting increased indexed exercise PAWP or PA pressures; therefore, low peak VO2 should alert clinicians of abnormal underlying hemodynamics.

Fontan hemodynamics in adults with obesity compared to overweight and normal body mass index: a retrospective invasive exercise study.

AIMS: The effects of obesity on Fontan hemodynamics are poorly understood. Accordingly, we assessed its impact on exercise invasive hemodynamics and exercise capacity. METHODS: Seventy-seven adults post-Fontan undergoing exercise cardiac catheterization (supine cycle protocol) were retrospectively identified using an institutional database and categorized according to the presence of obesity (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) and overweight/normal BMI (BMI≤30 kg/m2). RESULTS: There were 18 individuals with obesity (BMI 36.4±3 kg/m2) and 59 (BMI 24.1±3.6 kg/m2) with overweight/normal BMI. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) on noninvasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing was lower in patients with obesity (15.6±3.5 vs 19.6±5.8 ml/kg/min, p=0.04). At rest, systemic flow (Qs) (7.0 [4.8; 8.3] vs 4.8 [3.9; 5.8] l/min, p=0.001), pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (16.3±3.5 vs 13.1±3.5 mmHg, p=0.002), and PA wedge pressure (PAWP) (11.7±4.4 vs 8.9±3.1 mmHg, p=0.01) were higher, while arterial O2 saturation was lower (89.5% [86.5; 92.3] vs 93% [90; 95]) in obesity compared to overweight/normal BMI. Similarly, patients with obesity had higher exercise PA pressure (29.7±6.5 vs 24.7±6.8 mmHg, p=0.01) and PAWP (23.0±6.5 vs 19.8±7.3 mmHg, p=0.047), but lower arterial O2 saturation (82.4±7.0% vs 89% [85; 92], p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Adults post-Fontan with obesity have worse aerobic capacity, increased Qs, higher filling pressures, and decreased arterial O2 saturation compared to those with overweight/normal BMI, both at rest and during exercise, mirroring the findings observed in the obesity phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Whether treating obesity and its cardiometabolic sequelae in Fontan patients will improve hemodynamics and outcomes requires further study.

Seventy-seven adults post-Fontan undergoing exercise cardiac catheterization (supine cycle protocol) at Mayo Clinic, MN were categorized according to according to the presence of obesity (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) and overweight/normal BMI (BMI≤30 kg/m2). Adults post-Fontan with obesity have worse aerobic capacity, increased cardiac output, higher filling pressures, decreased arterial O2 saturation, and lower systemic vascular resistance compared to individuals with overweight or normal BMI, both at rest and during exercise.These findings mirror the observations in the obesity phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Whether treating obesity and its cardiometabolic sequelae in Fontan patients will improve hemodynamics and outcomes requires further study.

Inflammation in Obesity-Related HFpEF: The STEP-HFpEF Program.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is thought to be an important mechanism for the development and progression of obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the STEP-HFpEF Program, once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, reduced the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, and reduced body weight in participants with obesity-related HFpEF. However, neither the prevalence nor the clinical characteristics of patients who have various magnitudes of inflammation in the context of obesity-related HFpEF have been well described. Furthermore, whether the beneficial effects of semaglutide on the various HF efficacy endpoints in the STEP-HFpEF Program are modified by the baseline levels of inflammation has not been fully established. Finally, the relationship between weight reduction and changes in CRP across the STEP-HFpEF Program have not been fully defined. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to: 1) evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with obesity-related HFpEF that have various levels of inflammation in the STEP-HFpEF Program; 2) determine if the effects of weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo across all key outcomes are influenced by baseline levels of inflammation assessed by CRP levels; and 3) determine the relationship between change in CRP and weight loss in the STEP-HFpEF Program. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM). The outcomes were change in the dual primary endpoints (health status [measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS)] and body weight) from baseline to 52 weeks according to baseline CRP levels. Additional efficacy endpoints included change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), a hierarchical composite endpoint that included death, heart failure events, and differences in the change in the KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD, and levels of CRP in semaglutide- vs placebo-treated patients. Patients were stratified into 3 categories based on baseline CRP levels (<2, ≥2 to <10, and ≥10 mg/L). RESULTS: In total, 1,145 patients were randomized, of which 71% of patients had evidence of inflammation (CRP ≥2 mg/L). At baseline, those with higher levels of inflammation were younger, were more likely to be female, and had higher body mass index, worse health status (KCCQ-CSS), and shorter 6MWD. Semaglutide vs placebo led to reductions in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations as well as body weight, and to improvements in 6MWD and the hierarchical composite endpoint that were consistent across baseline CRP categories (all P interaction nonsignificant). Semaglutide also reduced CRP to a greater extent than placebo regardless of baseline CRP levels (P interaction = 0.32). Change in CRP from baseline to 52 weeks was similar regardless of the magnitude of weight loss (P interaction = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation is highly prevalent in obesity-related HFpEF. Semaglutide consistently improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, and reduced body weight across the categories of baseline CRP. Semaglutide also reduced inflammation, regardless of either baseline CRP or magnitude of weight loss during the trials. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF; NCT04788511]; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP HFpEF DM; NCT04916470]).

Effect of Semaglutide on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Obesity-Related Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and is a key driver for the development and progression of heart failure (HF). Once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) has been shown to improve HF-related symptoms and physical limitations, body weight, and exercise function in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the effects of semaglutide on cardiac structure and function in this population remain unknown. OBJECTIVES: In this echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program, we evaluated treatment effects of once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) vs placebo on cardiac structure and function. METHODS: Echocardiography at randomization and 52 weeks was performed in 491 of 1,145 participants (43%) in the STEP-HFpEF Program (pooled STEP-HFpEF [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity and HFpEF] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity, HFpEF, and Type 2 Diabetes] trials). The prespecified primary outcome was change in left atrial (LA) volume, with changes in other echocardiography parameters evaluated as secondary outcomes. Treatment effects of semaglutide vs placebo were assessed using analysis of covariance stratified by trial and body mass index, with adjustment for baseline parameter values. RESULTS: Overall, baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were balanced among those receiving semaglutide (n = 253) and placebo (n = 238). Between baseline and 52 weeks, semaglutide attenuated progression of LA remodeling (estimated mean difference [EMD] in LA volume, -6.13 mL; 95% CI: -9.85 to -2.41 mL; P = 0.0013) and right ventricular (RV) enlargement (EMD in RV end-diastolic area: -1.99 cm2; 95% CI: -3.60 to -0.38 cm2; P = 0.016; EMD in RV end-systolic area: -1.41 cm2; 95% CI: -2.42 to -0.40] cm2; P = 0.0064) compared with placebo. Semaglutide additionally improved E-wave velocity (EMD: -5.63 cm/s; 95% CI: -9.42 to -1.84 cm/s; P = 0.0037), E/A (early/late mitral inflow velocity) ratio (EMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.04; P = 0.0075), and E/e' (early mitral inflow velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity) average (EMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.60 to 0.01; P = 0.05). These associations were not modified by diabetes or atrial fibrillation status. Semaglutide did not significantly affect left ventricular dimensions, mass, or systolic function. Greater weight loss with semaglutide was associated with greater reduction in LA volume (Pinteraction = 0.033) but not with changes in E-wave velocity, E/e' average, or RV end-diastolic area. CONCLUSIONS: In the STEP-HFpEF Program echocardiography substudy, semaglutide appeared to improve adverse cardiac remodeling compared with placebo, further suggesting that treatment with semaglutide may be disease modifying among patients with obesity-related HFpEF. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF]; NCT04788511; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM]; NCT04916470).

Semaglutide versus placebo in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (hereafter referred to as HFpEF) is the most common type of heart failure and is associated with a high risk of hospitalisation and death, especially in patients with overweight, obesity, or type 2 diabetes. In the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations in participants with HFpEF. Whether semaglutide also reduces clinical heart failure events in this group remains to be established. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc pooled, participant-level analysis of four randomised, placebo-controlled trials (SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM) to examine the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2·4 mg in SELECT, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM; 1·0 mg in FLOW) on heart failure events. The STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpF DM trials enrolled participants with obesity-related HFpEF, the SELECT trial enrolled participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, and the FLOW trial enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Hence, for this analysis, we include all participants from the STEP-HFpEF trials and those with an investigator-reported history of HFpEF from SELECT and FLOW. The main outcomes for this analysis were the composite endpoint of time to cardiovascular death or first worsening heart failure event (defined as hospitalisation or urgent visit due to heart failure), time to first worsening heart failure event, and time to cardiovascular death. Efficacy and safety endpoints were analysed with the full analysis set (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment, according to the intention-to-treat principle). The SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597, NCT03819153, NCT04788511, and NCT04916470, respectively, and all are complete. FINDINGS: Across the four trials, 3743 (16·8%) of 22 282 participants had a history of HFpEF (1914 assigned to semaglutide and 1829 assigned to placebo). In this group of participants with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure events (103 [5·4%] of 1914 in the semaglutide group had events vs 138 [7·5%] of 1829 in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·53-0·89]; p=0·0045). Semaglutide also reduced the risk of worsening heart failure events (54 [2·8%] vs 86 [4·7%]; HR 0·59 [0·41-0·82]; p=0·0019). No significant effect on cardiovascular death alone was seen (59 [3·1%] vs 67 [3·7%]; HR 0·82 [0·57-1·16]; p=0·25). A lower proportion of patients treated with semaglutide had serious adverse events than did those who were treated with placebo (572 [29·9%] vs 708 [38·7%]). INTERPRETATION: In patients with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events, and worsening heart failure events alone, whereas its effect on cardiovascular death alone was not significant. These data support the use of semaglutide as an efficacious therapy to reduce the risk of clinical heart failure events in patients with HFpEF, for whom few treatment options are currently available. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

Atrial Fibrillation and Semaglutide Effects in Obesity-Related Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: STEP-HFpEF Program.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a key factor in the development and progression of both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In the STEP-HFpEF Program (comprising the STEP-HFpEF [Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes] trials), once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function and reduced body weight in patients with obesity-related HFpEF. Whether the effects of semaglutide in this patient group differ in participants with and without AF (and across various AF types) has not been fully examined. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were: 1) to evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with obesity-related HFpEF with and without a history of AF; and 2) to determine if the efficacy of semaglutide across all key trial outcomes are influenced by baseline history of AF (and AF types) in the STEP-HFpEF Program. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials. Patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) <90 points were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or matching placebo for 52 weeks. Dual primary endpoints (change in KCCQ-CSS and percent change in body weight), confirmatory secondary endpoints (change in 6-minute walk distance; hierarchical composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, HF events, thresholds of change in KCCQ-CSS, and 6-minute walk distance; and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and exploratory endpoint (change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) were examined according to investigator-reported history of AF (yes/no). Responder analyses examined the proportions of patients who experienced a ≥5-, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS per history of AF. RESULTS: Of the 1,145 participants, 518 (45%) had a history of AF (40% paroxysmal, 24% persistent AF, and 35% permanent AF) and 627 (55%) did not. Participants with (vs without) AF were older, more often male, had higher NT-proBNP levels, included a higher proportion of those with NYHA functional class III symptoms, and used more antithrombotic therapies, beta-blockers, and diuretics. Semaglutide led to larger improvements in KCCQ-CSS (11.5 points [95% CI: 8.3-14.8] vs 4.3 points [95% CI: 1.3-7.2]; P interaction = 0.001) and the hierarchal composite endpoint (win ratio of 2.25 [95% CI: 1.79-2.83] vs 1.30 [95% CI: 1.06-1.59]; P interaction < 0.001) in participants with AF vs without AF, respectively. The proportions of patients receiving semaglutide vs those receiving placebo experiencing ≥5-, ≥10-, ≥15-, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS were also higher in those with (vs without) AF (all P interaction values <0.05). Semaglutide consistently reduced CRP, NT-proBNP, and body weight regardless of AF status (all P interaction values not significant). There were fewer serious adverse events and serious cardiac disorders in participants treated with semaglutide vs placebo irrespective of AF history. CONCLUSIONS: In the STEP-HFpEF Program, AF was observed in nearly one-half of patients with obesity-related HFpEF and was associated with several features of more advanced HF. Treatment with semaglutide led to significant improvements in HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, as well as reductions in weight, CRP, and NT-proBNP in people with and without AF and across AF types. The magnitude of semaglutide-mediated improvements in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations was more pronounced in those with AF vs without AF at baseline.(Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF; NCT04788511; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM; NCT04916470]).

Long term safety and outcomes after atrial shunting for heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: 5-year and 3-year follow-up in the REDUCE LAP-HF I and II trials.

BACKGROUND: There is a little evidence regarding long-term safety and efficacy for atrial shunt devices in heart failure (HF). METHODS: The REDUCE LAP-HF I (n = 44) and II (n = 621) trials (RCT-I and -II) were multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trials of patients with HF and ejection fraction >40%. Outcome data were analyzed from RCT-I, a mechanistic trial with 5-year follow-up, and RCT-II, a pivotal trial identifying a responder group (n = 313) defined by exercise PVR <1.74 WU and no cardiac rhythm management device with 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: At 5 years in RCT I, there were no differences in cardiovascular (CV) mortality, HF events, embolic stroke, or new-onset atrial fibrillation between groups. After 3 years in RCT II, there was no difference in the primary outcome (hierarchical composite of CV mortality, stroke, HF events, and KCCQ) between shunt and sham in the overall trial. Compared to sham, those with responder characteristics in RCT-II had a better outcome with shunt (win ratio 1.6 [95% CI 1.2-2.2], P = .006; 44% reduction in HF events [shunt 9 vs. control 16 per 100 patient-years], P = .005; and greater improvement in KCCQ overall summary score [+17.9 ± 20.0 vs. +7.6 ± 20.4], P < .001), while nonresponders had significantly more HF events. Shunt treatment at 3 years was associated with a higher rate of ischemic stroke (3.2% vs. 0%, 95% CI 2%-6.1%, P = .032) and lower incidence of worsening kidney dysfunction (10.7% vs. 19.3%, P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: With up to 5 years of follow up, adverse events were low in patients receiving atrial shunts. In the responder group, atrial shunt treatment was associated with a significantly lower HF event rate and improved KCCQ compared to sham through 3 years of follow-up. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02600234, NCT03088033.

Dapagliflozin Enhances Arterial and Venous Compliance During Exercise in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the CAMEO-DAPA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Systemic arterial compliance and venous capacitance are typically impaired in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), contributing to hemodynamic congestion with stress. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors reduce hemodynamic congestion and improve clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF, but the mechanisms remain unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that Dapagliflozin would improve systemic arterial compliance and venous capacitance during exercise in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: In this secondary analysis from the CAMEO-DAPA trial (Cardiac and Metabolic Effects of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Trial), 37 patients with HFpEF (mean age 68 ± 9 years, women 65%) underwent invasive hemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography at baseline and following treatment for 24 weeks with Dapagliflozin or placebo. Radial artery pressure (BP) was measured continuously using a fluid-filled catheter with transformation to aortic pressure, central hemodynamics were measured using high-fidelity micromanometers, and stressed blood volume was estimated from hemodynamic indices fit to a comprehensive cardiovascular model. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant effect of Dapagliflozin on resting BP, but Dapagliflozin reduced systolic BP during peak exercise (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -18.8 mm Hg [95% CI, -33.9 to -3.7] P=0.016). Reduction in BP was related to improved exertional total arterial compliance (ETD, 0.06 mL/mm Hg/m2 [95% CI, 0.003-0.11] P=0.039) and aortic root characteristic impedance (ETD, -2.6 mm Hg/mL*sec [95% CI: -5.1 to -0.03] P=0.048), with no significant effect on systemic vascular resistance. Dapagliflozin reduced estimated stressed blood volume at rest and during peak exercise (ETD, -292 mm Hg [95% CI, -530 to -53] P=0.018), and improved venous capacitance evidenced by a decline in ratio of estimated stressed blood volume to total blood volume (ETD, -7.3% [95% CI, -13.3 to -1.3] P=0.020). Each of these effects of Dapagliflozin at peak exercise were also observed during matched 20W exercise intensity. Improvements in total arterial compliance and estimated stressed blood volume were correlated with decreases in body weight, and reduction in systolic BP with treatment was correlated with the change in estimated stressed blood volume during exercise (r=0.40, P=0.019). Decreases in BP were correlated with reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise (r=0.56, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFpEF, treatment with Dapagliflozin improved systemic arterial compliance and venous capacitance during exercise, while reducing aortic characteristic impedance, suggesting a reduction in arterial wall stiffness. These vascular effects may partially explain the clinical benefits with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in HFpEF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04730947.

Racial Differences of Cardiac Structure and Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Potential race differences in cardiac structure and function among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are not well-understood, but may have pathophysiological and treatment implications. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, patients with HFpEF who self-identified as Asian (n = 360), White (n = 787), and Black (n = 171) from 3 institutions underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate for potential differences. The Asian HFpEF group was oldest and the Black HFpEF group was youngest (75 ± 12 years vs 73 ± 13 years vs 62 ± 12 years; P < .0001). Women constituted the lowest proportion of patients with HFpEF among Asian individuals, but were the largest among Black patients (49% vs 56% vs 73%; P < .0001). Body mass index and obesity prevalence were highest in Black patients with HFpEF and were lowest in Asian patients. Black individuals with HFpEF had greater left ventricular (LV) wall thickening and concentricity, smaller LV chamber size, leftward-shifted LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship, indicating greater LV stiffening, smallest left atrial volumes, and the most right ventricular dilatation. Asian individuals with HFpEF had greater LV and left atrial dilation, more rightward shifted LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship, and the highest arterial stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we show that patients with HFpEF of Asian, Black, and White race display key differences in clinical, anthropometric, and cardiac structure-function indices, indicating that consideration of race-related differences might important to individualize treatment strategies in HFpEF.

Pathophysiological insights into HFpEF from studies of human cardiac tissue.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major, worldwide health-care problem. Few therapies for HFpEF exist because the pathophysiology of this condition is poorly defined and, increasingly, postulated to be diverse. Although perturbations in other organs contribute to the clinical profile in HFpEF, altered cardiac structure, function or both are the primary causes of this heart failure syndrome. Therefore, studying myocardial tissue is fundamental to improve pathophysiological insights and therapeutic discovery in HFpEF. Most studies of myocardial changes in HFpEF have relied on cardiac tissue from animal models without (or with limited) confirmatory studies in human cardiac tissue. Animal models of HFpEF have evolved based on theoretical HFpEF aetiologies, but these models might not reflect the complex pathophysiology of human HFpEF. The focus of this Review is the pathophysiological insights gained from studies of human HFpEF myocardium. We outline the rationale for these studies, the challenges and opportunities in obtaining myocardial tissue from patients with HFpEF and relevant comparator groups, the analytical approaches, the pathophysiological insights gained to date and the remaining knowledge gaps. Our objective is to provide a roadmap for future studies of cardiac tissue from diverse cohorts of patients with HFpEF, coupling discovery biology with measures to account for pathophysiological diversity.

Dapagliflozin and Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Vascular Interaction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during exercise reduce pulmonary artery (PA) compliance, increase pulsatile right ventricular (RV) afterload, and impair RV-PA coupling in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The effects of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on pulmonary vascular properties and RV-PA coupling are unknown. Objective: To test the effect of dapagliflozin on right ventricular performance and pulmonary vascular load during exertion in HFpEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Evaluation of the Cardiac and Metabolic Effects of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (CAMEO-DAPA) randomized clinical trial demonstrated improvement in PCWP at rest and exercise over 24 weeks with dapagliflozin compared with placebo with participants recruited between February 2021 and May 2022. This secondary analysis evaluates the effects of dapagliflozin on pulsatile pulmonary vascular load and RV-PA coupling using simultaneous echocardiography and high-fidelity invasive hemodynamic testing with exercise. This was a single-center study including patients with hemodynamically confirmed HFpEF with exercise PCWP of 25 mm Hg or greater. Interventions: Dapagliflozin or placebo for 24 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pulsatile pulmonary vascular load (PA compliance and elastance) and right ventricular performance (PA pulsatility index, RV systolic velocity [s']/PA mean) during rest and exercise. Results: Among 37 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [8.5] years; 25 female [65%]; mean [SD] body mass index, 34.9 [6.7]; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), there was no effect of dapagliflozin on PA loading or RV-PA interaction at rest. However, with exercise, dapagliflozin improved PA compliance (placebo-corrected mean difference, 0.57 mL/mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.11-1.03 mL/mm Hg; P = .02) and decreased PA elastance (stiffness; -0.17 mm Hg/mL; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.07 mm Hg/mL; P = .001). RV function during exercise improved, with increase in PA pulsatility index (0.33; 95% CI, 0.08-0.59; P = .01) and increase in exercise RV s' indexed to PA pressure (0.09 cm·s-1/mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16 cm·s-1/mm Hg; P = .01). Improvements in pulsatile RV load and RV-PA coupling were correlated with reduction in right atrial (RA) pressure (PA elastance Pearson r = 0.55; P =.008; RV s'/PA elastance Pearson r = -0.60; P =.002) and PCWP (PA elastance Pearson r = 0.58; P <.001; RV s'/PA elastance Pearson r = -0.47; P = .02). Dapagliflozin increased resistance-compliance time (dapagliflozin, median [IQR] change, 0.06 [0.03-0.15] seconds; placebo, median [IQR] change, 0.01 [-0.02 to 0.05] seconds; P =.046), resulting in higher PA compliance for any exercise pulmonary vascular resistance. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial reveal that treatment with dapagliflozin for 24 weeks reduced pulsatile pulmonary vascular load and enhanced dynamic RV-PA interaction during exercise in patients with HFpEF, findings that are related to the magnitude of PCWP reduction. Benefits on dynamic right ventricular-pulmonary vascular coupling may partially explain the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04730947.

Non-invasive prediction of pulmonary vascular disease-related exercise intolerance and survival in non-group 1 pulmonary hypertension.

AIMS: The clinical utility of pulmonary hypertension (PH) risk scores in non-group 1 PH with pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) remains unresolved. METHODS AND RESULTS: We utilized the prospective multicenter PVDOMICS cohort with group 2, 3, 4 or 5 PH-related PVD and calculated group 1 PH risk scores (REVEAL 2.0, REVEAL Lite 2, French registry score and COMPERA 2). The c-statistic to predict death was compared separately in (i) pre-capillary PH groups 3/4/5, and (ii) combined post- and pre-capillary PH group 2. Exercise right heart catheterization reserve, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling were compared across risk categories. Among 449 individuals with group 3/4/5 PH, the REVEAL 2.0 risk score had the highest c-statistic for predicting death (0.699, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660-0.737, p < 0.0001) with comparable performance using the simpler REVEAL Lite 2 score (0.695, 95% CI 0.656-0.734, p < 0.0001). The French and COMPERA 2 risk scores were also predictive of mortality, but performance of both was statistically inferior to REVEAL 2.0 (c-statistic difference -0.072, 95% CI -0.123 to -0.020, p = 0.006, and -0.043, 95% CI -0.067 to -0.018, p = 0.0007, respectively). RV function and RV-PA coupling measures were prognostic in isolation, but did not add incremental value to REVEAL (p > 0.50 for all). Findings were similar in patients with group 2 PH (n = 239). Stratification by the REVEAL Lite 2 score non-invasively identified non-group 1 PH with more advanced PVD with worse exercise capacity, RV-PA uncoupling, ventricular interdependence and impaired cardiac output reserve (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive REVEAL risk predicts mortality in non-group 1 PH without incremental prognostic value from detailed RV function or RV-PA coupling assessment. Baseline REVEAL Lite 2 risk stratification non-invasively identifies greater pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart-related exercise limitation, which may help guide patient selection for targeted pulmonary vascular therapies in non-group 1 PH.

Interleukin-6 and Cardiovascular Events in Healthy Adults: MESA.

Background: Elevated interleukin (IL)-6 levels have been linked to adverse outcomes in patients with and without baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between circulating IL-6 levels and CVD events without baseline CVD across racial and ethnic groups. Methods: We conducted an observational analysis utilizing the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), a multicenter, prospective community-based study of CVD at baseline from four racial and ethnic groups. IL-6 levels were measured at the time of enrollment (visit 1) and were divided into 3 terciles. Patient baseline characteristics and outcomes, including all-cause mortality, CV mortality, heart failure, and non-CV mortality, were included. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess associations between IL-6 levels and study outcomes with IL-6 tercile 1 as reference. Results: Of 6,622 individuals, over half were women (53%) with a median age of 62 (IQR: 53-70) years. Racial and ethnic composition was non-Hispanic White (39%) followed by African American (27%), Hispanic (22%), and Chinese American (12%). Compared to tercile 1, participants with IL-6 tercile 3 had a higher adjusted risk of and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.67-2.36]), CV mortality (HR: 1.55 [95% CI: 1.05-2.30]), non-CV mortality (HR: 2.05 [95% CI: 1.65-2.56]), and heart failure (HR: 1.48 [95% CI: 0.99-2.19]). When tested as a continuous variable, higher levels of IL-6 were associated with an increased risk of all individual outcomes. Compared to non-Hispanic White participants, the unadjusted and adjusted risk of all outcomes across all races and ethnicities was similar across all IL-6 terciles. Conclusions: High levels of circulating IL-6 are associated with worse CV outcomes and increased all-cause mortality consistently across all racial and ethnic groups.

An evidence-based screening tool for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFpEF-ABA score.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is under-recognized in clinical practice. Although a previously developed risk score, termed H2FPEF, can be used to estimate HFpEF probability, this score requires imaging data, which is often unavailable. Here we sought to develop an HFpEF screening model that is based exclusively on clinical variables and that can guide the need for echocardiography and further testing. In a derivation cohort (n = 414, 249 women), a clinical model using age, body mass index and history of atrial fibrillation (termed the HFpEF-ABA score) showed good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.839 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.800-0.877), P < 0.0001). The performance of the model was validated in an international, multicenter cohort (n = 736, 443 women; AUC = 0.813 (95% CI = 0.779-0.847), P < 0.0001) and further validated in two additional cohorts: a cohort including patients with unexplained dyspnea (n = 228, 136 women; AUC = 0.840 (95% CI = 0.782-0.900), P < 0.0001) and a cohort for which HF hospitalization was used instead of hemodynamics to establish an HFpEF diagnosis (n = 456, 272 women; AUC = 0.929 (95% CI = 0.909-0.948), P < 0.0001). Model-based probabilities were also associated with increased risk of HF hospitalization or death among patients from the Mayo Clinic (n = 790) and a US national cohort across the Veteran Affairs health system (n = 3076, 110 women). Using the HFpEF-ABA score, rapid and efficient screening for risk of undiagnosed HFpEF can be performed in patients with dyspnea using only age, body mass index and history of atrial fibrillation.

Clinical features, haemodynamics, and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in coarctation of aorta.

AIMS: There are similarities in the pathogenesis of cardiac remodelling and dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and coarctation of aorta (COA). We hypothesized that clinical HFpEF would be highly prevalent in adults with COA, and that the presence of HFpEF would increase the risk of mortality in this population. The aim of this study was to define the clinical features, haemodynamics, and prognostic implications of HFpEF in COA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive adults with repaired COA that underwent right heart catheterization were identified retrospectively. HFpEF was defined as heart failure symptoms (exertional dyspnoea or fatigue), preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, and pulmonary artery wedge pressure at rest >15 mmHg. Of 99 COA patients, 32 (32%) had HFpEF. The correlates of HFpEF were obesity (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-13.2), atrial fibrillation (adjusted OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.00-10.7), total arterial compliance index (adjusted OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06-0.41 per 1 ml/mmHg*m2), and pulmonary artery compliance index (adjusted OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.56 per 1 ml/mmHg*m2). Of 99 patients, 24 (24%) died and 5 (5%) underwent heart transplant. The 10-year cumulative incidence of death/transplant was higher in COA patients with HFpEF compared with patients without HFpEF (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.001). The presence of HFpEF was associated with increased risk of death/transplant (adjusted hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.16-3.11). CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is common in adults with COA and is associated with greater risk of death/transplant, emphasizing a pressing need for interventions to prevent and treat HFpEF in COA.