Effect of the povidone iodine, hypertonic alkaline solution and saline nasal lavage on nasopharyngeal viral load in COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the in vivo activity of nasal irrigation (NI) with saline, NI with povidone-iodine (PVP-I) 1%, NI with a mix of hypertonic alkaline and PVP-I 1% against Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). DESIGN: This study was a prospective randomised clinical trial. SETTING: A multicenter study involving tertiary care centres. PARTICIPANTS: The study included adult outpatients whose qualitative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests in nasopharyngeal swabs were positive. One hundred twenty patients were divided into four equal groups. Standard COVID-19 treatment was given to Group 1, NI containing saline was added to patients' treatment in Group 2, NI containing 1% PVP-I solution was added to patients' treatment in Group 3, and NI containing 1% PVP-I solution and the hypertonic alkaline solution was added to patients' treatment in Group 4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On the first day of diagnosis (Day 0), nasopharyngeal swab samples were taken, on the third and fifth days the nasopharyngeal viral load (NVL) reduction in quantitative RT-PCR test was calculated. RESULTS: Between the zeroth to third days and zeroth to fifth days, the NVL reduction was significant in all groups (p < .05). In paired comparisons of groups, the NVL decrease in Group 4 in the first 3 days was significantly lower than all groups (p < .05). The NVL decrease in Groups 3 and 4 in the first 5 days were significantly lower than Group 1 (p < .05). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the use of NI of 1% PVP-I and the hypertonic alkaline solution mixture was more effective in reducing NVL.

Validation and Clinical Application of the Turkish Version of the RhinoQOL Questionnaire in the Setting of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyp Patients.

Objectives: Validation of the translations of questionnaires from foreign languages is important. Failure to validate surveys can lead to misapplication. Methods: A total of 64 patients who presented with nasal obstruction due to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and 64 control subjects were included in this prospective instrument validation study. Translation and back-translation method was used to adapt the Rhinosinusitis quality of life (RhinoQOL) into Turkish. The test and retest reliability, internal consistency, reproducibility, construct validity, and sensitivity to change were assessed. Results: The mean±SD test and retest scores were similar in the control group. Cronbach correlation coefficients were 0.872, 0.873, and 0.959 for the test and were 0.799, 0.725, and 0.885 for the retest scores for the frequency, bothersomeness, and impact domains. Post-operative scores were significantly higher than pre-operative scores obtained for each domain of the RhinoQOL questionnaire in the patient group (p<0.001). Pre-operative scores for frequency, bothersomeness, and impact domains were significantly lower than the corresponding average test and retest scores for each domain in the control group (p<0.001), whereas other than significantly higher bothersomeness scores in patient versus controls (p=0.018), no significant difference was noted between post-operative scores and average test and retest scores. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that the Turkish translation is equivalent to the English version of RhinoQOL in terms of internal consistency, test and retest reliability, and construct validity, with good responsiveness to change and thus potential utility in the assessment of post-operative outcome.