Managing Cancer Pain in Hospitalized Patients with Comorbid Opioid Use Disorder with Buprenorphine: A Case Series.

Data indicate that one in five patients with cancer might be at risk for nonmedical opioid use and its extreme form, opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine is one of the few medications available for the management of patients with co-occurring OUD and chronic pain. Care for these patients can be challenging and require the expertise of specialist clinicians with a deep understanding of addiction and cancer pain. Regrettably, these specialist clinicians may not always be available and accessible when patients are admitted to the hospital. Reports on how primary non-specialist clinicians without access to specialist addiction services navigate the care of such patients in the inpatient setting are limited. We hereby describe the care of three patients with OUD receiving buprenorphine who were hospitalized for cancer pain.

The impact of a web-based prognostic calculator on prognostic confidence in outpatient palliative care.

PURPOSE: Clinicians are often uncertain about their prognostic estimates, which may impede prognostic communication and clinical decision-making. We assessed the impact of a web-based prognostic calculator on physicians' prognostic confidence. METHODS: In this prospective study, palliative care physicians estimated the prognosis of patients with advanced cancer in an outpatient clinic using the temporal, surprise, and probabilistic approaches for 6 m, 3 m, 2 m, 1 m, 2 w, 1 w, and 3 d. They then reviewed information from www.predictsurvival.com , which calculated survival estimates from seven validated prognostic scores, including the Palliative Prognostic Score, Palliative Prognostic Index, and Palliative Performance Status, and again provided their prognostic estimates after calculator use. The primary outcome was prognostic confidence in temporal CPS (0-10 numeric rating scale, 0 = not confident, 10 = most confident). RESULTS: Twenty palliative care physicians estimated prognoses for 217 patients. The mean (standard deviation) prognostic confidence significantly increased from 5.59 (1.68) before to 6.94 (1.39) after calculator use (p < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of physicians reported feeling confident enough in their prognosis to share it with patients (44% vs. 74%, p < 0.001) and formulate care recommendations (80% vs. 94%, p < 0.001) after calculator use. Prognostic accuracy did not differ significantly before or after calculator use, ranging from 55-100%, 29-98%, and 48-100% for the temporal, surprise, and probabilistic approaches, respectively. CONCLUSION: This web-based prognostic calculator was associated with increased prognostic confidence and willingness to discuss prognosis. Further research is needed to examine how prognostic tools may augment prognostic discussions and clinical decision-making.

Integration of palliative care in the management of multiple chronic conditions: An expert consensus paper with policy implications.

BACKGROUND: This paper was jointly developed from members of the American Academy of Nursing Expert Panels on Palliative and End of Life Care, Primary Care, Aging, Acute and Critical Care, and two expert physicians. PURPOSE: The overarching goal is to promote the integration of palliative care as symptom management into the primary care setting to transform care for patients living with multiple chronic conditions. METHODS: Embracing the recommendations made by the World Health Organization, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine to initiate palliative care or symptom management at the onset of nonreversible or serious chronic conditions. DISCUSSION: Earlier palliative interventions reduce disease exacerbation, prevent hospitalization, maintain physical functioning, and support health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: This is a needed paradigm shift as the nation's aging population escalates, Americans are living longer, and the healthcare costs for the nation are unprecedented.

Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Patients with Advanced Cancer Receiving Home Palliative Care.

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is the standard treatment for anemia in advanced cancer. Nevertheless, guidelines for managing this condition are still not exhaustive. Objective: To investigate frequency, timing, and clinical characteristics associated with RBC transfusions in patients with advanced cancer assisted by at-home oncological care service and to evaluate the association between parameters at the entry and the possibility of receiving RBC transfusions during homecare. Design: Retrospective observational study without medication. Setting/Subjects: Patients with advanced cancer entered in homecare during 2021 living in Bologna (Italy). Measurements: Gender, tumor primary site, oncological therapy, and symptoms at the entry were considered as possible factors in a binary logistic regression for the possibility of receiving at least one RBC transfusion during assistance. Data about transfusions were analyzed, and the transfusion history for each patient from the entry to death was traced. Results: Among the 1108 patients admitted, 179 (16.2%) were given at least one RBC transfusion during homecare. Genitourinary, hematological malignancies, and being still in therapy for advanced cancer are associated with a higher probability of receiving RBC transfusion during assistance (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, and p = 0.032, respectively). Half of the patients (52%) underwent RBC transfusions less than a month before death. Duration of the assistance was correlated with the period from last transfusion to death (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Hematological and genitourinary cancer and being in simultaneous care at the entry were associated with transfusion. Although the appropriateness of this treatment remains to be defined in this population, transfused patients frequently received "late in life" transfusions.

Patient considerations of social media account management after death.

PURPOSE: Social media is widely used but few studies have examined how patients with advanced cancer want their accounts managed after death. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of our patients with advanced cancer who have discussed the post-mortem management of their social media accounts with their family or friends. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey in which patients with advanced cancer at an outpatient Supportive Care Clinic at a tertiary cancer center completed a novel survey on social media use that assessed patients' social media use practices, attitudes and preferences, and reactions to the survey. RESULTS: Of 117 patients, 72 (61.5%) were women, and the mean age was 56.4 years old. We found that 24 (21%) of our patients have discussed their preferences for management of their social media accounts after death. Patients with a lower annual income were significantly more likely to report having such conversations (p = 0.0036). Completing the survey motivated 76 patients (67%) to discuss their social media accounts and 82 patients (71.3%) to explore how social media will be managed after their death. Half of our study participants reported social media as an important source of coping. CONCLUSION: Few patients have had conversations on the management of their accounts after death, although more were interested in exploring their options further. More research is needed to examine the role of social media as a digital legacy and a coping tool for patients with advanced cancer.

Transdermal Fentanyl in Patients with Cachexia-A Scoping Review.

Cachectic patients frequently require transdermal fentanyl (TDF) for pain management, but data on its efficacy and safety are scarce and inconsistent. This scoping review aims to analyze the evidence concerning TDF administration in patients with cachexia irrespective of the underlying pathology. The primary objective is to assess the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of TDF in cachectic patients. The secondary objective is to identify cachexia characteristics that may influence fentanyl pharmacokinetics (PK). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to March 2024. The review included observational and clinical studies on cachectic patients with moderate to severe pain treated with TDF patches at any dosage or frequency. Phase 1 trials, animal studies, case reports, preclinical studies and conference abstracts were excluded. Nine studies were included: four studies reported that cachexia negatively impacted TDF efficacy, increasing required doses and lowering plasma concentrations; three studies found minimal or no impact of cachexia on TDF efficacy and PK; two studies suggested that cachexia might improve TDF outcomes. Study quality ranged from moderate to high, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool. The current evidence is insufficient to provide any definitive recommendations for TDF prescribing in cachectic patients.

Predictive Biomarkers of Dyspnea Response to Dexamethasone and Placebo in Cancer Patients.

CONTEXT: In the Alleviating Breathlessness in Cancer Patients with Dexamethasone (ABCD) trial, dexamethasone did not improve dyspnea more than placebo in unselected cancer patients. However, it is unclear if patients with greater inflammation would be more likely to derive a treatment response. OBJECTIVES: To examine the predictive utility of cytokines for dyspnea response. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the ABCD double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose dexamethasone to placebo (NCT03367156). The primary outcome was dyspnea intensity over 14 days. Blood cytokine levels (TNF, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) were measured at baseline, day seven, and day 14. We used a generalized additive model to examine the association between baseline cytokine level and change in dyspnea from baseline to day seven and baseline to day 14 in dexamethasone and placebo groups. RESULTS: Of the 128 enrolled patients, 45 provided blood samples. TNF, IL-6, and IL-8 decreased over 14 days in the dexamethasone group but not placebo (P<0.05). Lower baseline TNF was associated with a greater reduction in dyspnea intensity by day seven in the placebo group (P=0.0013); conversely, higher baseline TNF was associated with a greater reduction in dyspnea intensity by day 7 in the dexamethasone group (difference between groups P=0.0019). Similar patterns were observed for IL-6 (P=0.000051), IL-8 (P=0.00063), and IL-10 (P=0.01) on day seven, and all cytokines on day 14. CONCLUSION: Cytokines decreased with dexamethasone, but not placebo. Higher baseline cytokine levels may identify patients likely to respond to dexamethasone and less likely to respond to placebo.

Perceptions Toward Naloxone Among Patients With Cancer Receiving Opioids.

CONTEXT: Naloxone nasal spray is recommended for patients with risk factors for opioid overdose. However, cancer patients' perceptions and beliefs regarding naloxone prescriptions and their self-perceived risks for overdose are understudied. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of cancer patients at risk for overdose who perceived naloxone as beneficial. METHODS: Between July 2020 and April 2022, we surveyed 150 adult patients from the supportive care ambulatory clinic at a tertiary cancer center in the United States who received a co-prescription of naloxone nasal spray. We measured patients' knowledge of overdose risk-factors, attitudes, beliefs, and education received on naloxone. Risk-factors between beneficial vs. nonbeneficial groups were analyzed. The survey was administered on paper or via a telephone interview. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients, 55% were male, 70% were white, and 81% had advanced cancer. The majority of patients believed naloxone was beneficial (100/150, 67%). When compared to the nonbeneficial group, more patients from the beneficial group agreed that the concurrent use of alcohol (100% vs. 90%; P = 0.004) or sedating drugs (96% vs. 85%; P = 0.04) with opioids could result in overdoses and felt safe having naloxone at home (95% vs. 60%; P <0.0001). More patients from the nonbeneficial group associated naloxone prescription with being suspected of misusing opioids (12/50 vs. 8/100; P = 0.01), and fewer had confidence in their caregivers' ability to administer naloxone (69% vs. 95%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Most patients understood the benefits of naloxone and felt safe having one at home. More research is needed to identify knowledge gaps and develop educational strategies for those who find it nonbeneficial.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Designing a Clinical Trial in Palliative Care.

The palliative care field is experiencing substantive growth in clinical trial-based research. Randomized controlled trials provide the necessary rigor and conditions for assessing a treatment's efficacy in a controlled population. It is therefore important that a trial is meticulously designed from the outset to ensure the integrity of the ultimate results. In this article, our team discusses ten tips on clinical trial design drawn from collective experiences in the field. These ten tips cover a range of topics that can prove challenging in trial design, from developing initial methodologies to planning sample size and powering the trial, as well as collaboratively navigating the ethical issues of trial initiation and implementation as a cohesive team. We aim to help new researchers design sound trials and continue to grow the evidence base for our specialty. The guidance provided here can be used independently or in addition to the ten tips provided by this team in a separate article focused on what palliative care clinicians should know about interpreting a clinical trial.

Conducting Physician Engagement Research in a Pandemic: Persevering when Burnout Mitigation Is Needed Most.

Background: We planned a pilot study on a physician engagement intervention, termed ECHO-MDA, using the Project ECHO framework. The study was approved and launched just as the COVID pandemic reached Texas. We pivoted to accommodate the realities of research in pandemic times. Objectives: The primary outcome was feasibility assessed by the proportion of participants attending at least 9 out of 13 ECHO-MDA sessions. Design: The study was envisioned as a randomized, wait-list pilot study exploring the impact ECHO-MDA with a planned enrollment of 50 physicians (25 per arm). Results: Due to pandemic-related challenges, 35 physicians were enrolled. Ten attended nine or more sessions. Participants indicated that the program was beneficial. Conclusion: Pandemic-related work and personal conditions likely had adverse impacts on enrollment and attendance. Launching professional wellness programs during a global crisis is challenging but can still yield benefits for participants. We offer suggestions for researchers launching professional engagement studies in unexpectedly challenging times.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Interpreting a Clinical Trial.

Evidence-based practice is foundational to high-quality palliative care delivery. However, the clinical trials that compose the evidence base are often methodologically imperfect. Applying their conclusions without critical application to the clinical practice context can harm patients. The tips provided can help clinicians infer judiciously from clinical trial results and avoid credulously accepting findings without critique. We suggest that statistical and mathematical expertise is unnecessary, but rather a keen curiosity about investigators' rationale for certain design choices and how these choices can affect results is key. For a more comprehensive understanding of clinical trials, this article can be used with the authors' corresponding ten tips article that focuses on designing a clinical trial.

Simulation-based caregiving skills training for family members of high-grade glioma patients.

Background: Because family caregivers of patients with a high-grade glioma experience high levels of distress and feel unprepared to perform the complex caregiving tasks associated with the disease and its treatment, we pilot-tested a caregiving skills intervention that integrates hands-on caregiving with coping skill training. Methods: In this single-arm trial, caregivers participated in a 4-session research nurse-led intervention involving simulation-based caregiving skills training at the hospital and psychoeducation delivered via videoconference. We collected measures of patients' and caregivers' psychological symptoms; caregivers' caregiving self-efficacy and role adjustment; and patients' cancer-related symptoms (MDASI) at baseline and again postintervention. We tracked feasibility data. Results: We approached 29 dyads of which 10 dyads (34%) consented. All patients (mean age: 60 years, 89% male) and caregivers (mean age: 58 years, 80% female, 80% spouses) completed the baseline and 7 dyads completed the follow-up assessments (attrition was related to patient's hospice transfer). Seven caregivers completed all 4 sessions and rated the program as beneficial. Paired t-tests revealed a significant improvement in caregiving self-efficacy at 6 weeks postintervention (t = -3.06, P = .02). Although improvements in caregiver role adjustment and patient and caregiver symptoms were not observed, no decreases in symptom burden or role adjustment were found during the follow-up period. Conclusions: This novel supportive care program appears to be safe, feasible, acceptable, and perceived as useful for caregivers of patients with high-grade glioma. Based on feasibility indicators and a signal of intervention efficacy, a randomized controlled trial is warranted.